Who's willing to make a bet? (about the future of this game)

Mess Room
1

Seems like a lot of people are against having combined matchmaking. Several factions in a single battle. Because it may damage “historical accuracy”.

So most of you honestly support the idea of new campaigns and each one having its own matchmaking / progression system?

Then I want to make a bet, that these changes will happen in the near future (Let’s it give it a span of 1-2 years)

  1. They’re going to implement a feature that’s going to combine matchmaking for several factions. Rather than have different matchmaking for each campaign.

  2. That they will revamp the progression system to faction-based rather than campaign-based progress. (Because if they do the part 1, it won’t make sense for them to have 2 different Russian factions from 2 different time periods / campaigns)

Or if not, the consequence being lacking players, long que times for older campaigns. Perhaps players replaced with bots due to low population playerbase. People getting tired of grinding same faction over with each campaign and quitting.

I honestly don’t see a way this game to will exist without a revamped matchmaking + progression structure.

So let’s make it a fun bet, and in the future we can check up on who was the Houdini :wink:

1 Like
2

This game are the definition of"I love it,but I hate it"because the grind system makes it so hard

3

There is literly 0 procent cahnce that will ever occur

1 Like
4

:blush: Ok, let’s see.

5

If this were to occurre it will be further down the road with more player base decline. As of now we are still in beta so its hard to predict

6

i find this one hard to believe, nor see.

especially when grinding is a thing, and the equipment differences within each faction.

pretty much.

i hope for this one.

makes more sense, and above all, we will avoid to see stuff that should come earlier, much, much later than it what should. ( for examples, squad bikes, mechanized infantry, AA and stuff like that which it’s present )

agreed.

2 Likes
7

ah yes latest rant.

8

excuse me, I’ll have you know I predicted last year that it’s an inevitable solution to playerbase balance.

and made a thread on how to best implement it

9

A rts war map of the world with multiple units from generals moving and fighting real time like hng but with way more content would make me a happy gamer in enlisted.

5 Likes
10

Mmmh :thinking:

What was your nickname from H&G?
We had some legendary Generals in Axis faction before the implementation of ressources stockpiles. Mainly they were very wealthy individuals with countless of squads that could single handedly hold a whole front by themselves. Ah, the “snakes” of troops it made on the map when they moved their armies…

1 Like
12

here;

Summary

i was one, of the 10 players that had the golden shovle :stuck_out_tongue:

Steam Community :: Shiivex :: Screenshots

2 Likes
13

I do like H&G and do think it would be a fun game if this game headed in that direction.

It’s a stretch though, lots of changes and additions have to be made for that to happen (and to be honest I just don’t see them doing it)

In the near term, I think if they divide the matchmaking by timeline rather than campaigns it would be a major step in the right direction.

1 Like
14

ah yes, hope you’re enjoying the new event btw.

All those people making tank jokes, RIP.

15

i hope you enjoy anything at all.

16

I enjoy the majority of the game, that’s why I even bother to make suggestions to try and improve it.

This event is a step in the right direction.

17

This event is a step in the “right direction” for YOU.

18

Totally agree. which can make real human players of different battles play together.

We hate playing with AI teamate players, and AI teammate enemies