Whole bunch of suggestions

[Ad9999]

@114488837

Yeah except they can’t make an “anti-camp” system because then things like snipers would get ruined. But yes, that is the most effective way.

Snipers would not be touched by that. It would just require from radiomen to see exact place that they want to call artiller on. So they would be in the line of sight and they could be shot without problems.

@114488837

It’s a videogames company. The financial incentive is not for the players, but for them. You know how it is, they are all greedy “bad-words” I won’t say as I don’t want to get banned. But yeah - you know that they won’t add anything the fans want unless it actually gives them more money or more money-making opportunities. Welcome to 2021.

They already do that, but it is not in our (players) interest to give them even more possibilites to do that.

@114488837

Oh yeah the end. Which 90% of players will never reach because there is too many levels in the battle pass, you get too little xp for such little time. Most casual players will never reach the free 100, and they knew it. But even if free, doesn’t make the point any less valid. Because with Elite BP you can get it easily much quicker than anyone else, and over the period of several BP’s probably more than anyone else.

They can get it without paying money. This is how it works - you invest money or invest time. There is enough time for BP to complete it without premium one. But you have to grind for it.
P2W is when paying player has some advantage that is impossible to get without paying money for it. Last 100 Gold from BP is free, but requires you to invest your time if you want to get it. So it’s not P2W.

[NomadBard]

@114488837

D-Day map. That map alone just needs fixing. Everything about it. First of all, why is there mountains on either side of the map, with turret emplacements? Yes, in Normandy there are cliffs, but the “cliffs” in-game are just full on mountains let’s be honest.

Agreed. They start of so good with the beach and then they ruin it with a fantasy a child would have if you explained the concept of Atlantic wall. I had a post about this, about the dumb terrain, excessive concrete usage etc.

@114488837

This then leads to more problems - the high terrain the Germans get basically just allow them to laser beam MG-42’s across the map on every single American soldier, who gets no cover what so ever inside the valley.

Yeah slow down there my man, you started of great, what the hell is this. Every second MG is blocked by a tree and every 3rd is facing the Germans. There is about 5000 different ways to flank or hide as the US and people have been complaining that the rest of the map is really easy for the US to take. Can’t move 2 feet without getting shot? Snipe the MGs or hide behind stuff. There is cover.

@114488837

The aforementioned head shake effect. It’s too over-the-top. In this game, a bullet just needs to go in your general direction and your head shakes like a bobblehead being dropped from space. It’s just too much shaking.

I feel like it would be fine if we could either prevent it or weaken it. Like if you hear artillery/bomb drop/grenade, lie down. Lying down should weaken the effects and if you got hit while standing you should be able to lie down to shorten the effect time. This would prevent people from running through arty spam like idiots.

@114488837

• Better anticheat system. Every other game I enter some guy is sitting at the back of the map shooting his Kar98k at 1000 rounds per second randomly, killing everyone across the map without seeing them. That’s an exaggeration obviously, but that just sums up how it feels, and how often I come across someone cheating in one way or another. Please no one reply “BuT i NeVeR cOmE aCrOsS hAcKeRs” - just because YOU got lucky and didn’t see any, doesn’t mean they aren’t there.

I’m gonna be the “BuT i NeVeR cOmE aCrOsS hAcKeRs” guy. It’s not about being lucky. I can’t begin to count the hours I spend on this game, and I’ve never encountered one. Am I lucky or are you just unlucky. I very much doubt you encountered a hacker extensively. I’m not denying they exist. I’m denying they are a problem to be prioritized.

@114488837

I never thought I’d say this about bronze orders, but they are too rare in my opinion.

I get like 2-4 per a single match? Without a premium account which would double it. No idea how that is “too rare”

@114488837

then gold which is obviously paid for

You can’t pay for golden order tho? Everyone is limited to one golden gun order and two golden soldier orders. You can’t buy more, you can only speed up the process.

@114488837

Linking back to point 3, to help counter the arty spam I suggest making the “Frequent Artillery” upgrade you get for the Radio Operator battalions available as a perk for each individual radio operator. This way, instead of getting the Frequent Artillery perk once and it applying to every soldier in that battalion, you’d have to apply it to every radio solider; meaning if you have 3 in a squad, only 1 might have frequent artillery, not all 3.

You can retrain perks, meaning you would just get a 30 second cooldown on every radio operator, this would make things worse. There is a lot of better suggestions on this forum already.

[Rixas188]

Yeah slow down there my man, you started of great, what the hell is this. Every second MG is blocked by a tree and every 3rd is facing the Germans. There is about 5000 different ways to flank or hide as the US and people have been complaining that the rest of the map is really easy for the US to take. Can’t move 2 feet without getting shot? Snipe the MGs or hide behind stuff. There is cover.

You can’t if the enemy team has more than 2 iq. The machine guns can just snipe people across the map due to their lack of bullet drop. The cover is almost all penetrable by bullets unless you are in a bunker, in which case a grenade ruins your day as you can’t get out in time and explosions have this ability to damage you through cover and far away.

people have been complaining that the rest of the map is really easy for the US to take

Then I’m sorry, but they have 0 iq or no strategy. A decent German team could easily hold off the American advancement especially on the last 2 or so objectives, less so the first couple.

Can’t move 2 feet without getting shot?

Relating to the problem of the hills. The snipers and machine guns on the top of the hills have a view of the entire valley so even moving cover-to-cover is an extreme risk.

Am I lucky or are you just unlucky

Tbh I’m just unlucky. I always get into the games with bad players, or the hackers. That’s my life. I think out of the 100s of games I’ve played, I’ve only ever had a good time / no hackers like once. But they are definitely a problem and I think cheating should always be a top priority. Hackers will never stop trying to find ways around anticheats, and developers should be trying to stop them.

I get like 2-4 per a single match? Without a premium account which would double it. No idea how that is “too rare”

Luck you. Never gotten more than 1. Could go absolutely ham, 1000s of XP - only get one. Maybe I’m just unlucky again, who knows.

[Rixas188]

You can’t pay for golden order tho?
Yeah my mistake, misunderstanding there. Sorry.
You can retrain perks, meaning you would just get a 30 second cooldown on every radio operator, this would make things worse. There is a lot of better suggestions on this forum already.

This would be in partnership with some of those other suggestions, not in place of them. It’s not always a “one fix solves everything” situation. Sometimes, more than one thing has to be done to counter an issue. By perking it, it means you have to earn it for every radio soldier, not just for the squad.

[Rixas188]

Snipers would not be touched by that. It would just require from radiomen to see exact place that they want to call artiller on. So they would be in the line of sight and they could be shot without problems.

Not what I thought you meant, my bad. Thought you meant like it auto-kills people for standing too long at the rear the map or something.

They already do that, but it is not in our (players) interest to give them even more possibilites to do that.

No, you’re right I don’t want to be giving them more p2w opportunities, but it’s the only language they speak so…

They can get it without paying money. This is how it works - you invest money or invest time. There is enough time for BP to complete it without premium one. But you have to grind for it.
P2W is when paying player has some advantage that is impossible to get without paying money for it. Last 100 Gold from BP is free, but requires you to invest your time if you want to get it. So it’s not P2W.

The problem isn’t putting in time. It’s TOO much time. I’ve completed all 3 challenges every day, and I’m on only 185xp. In 40 days, 185 xp / level 19. That’s completing all 3 challenges every day on my somewhat lenient schedule where I have decent time to play - if someone has a stricter work or school schedule, or end up missing a day for whatever reason, they’re F’ed. Nothing they can do. They’ll never get close. The Battlepass levels 40+ are basically just for Elite BP owners only, or those with no l1f3 who can play 24/7 all day every day.

[Rixas188]

That’s every day since I got the game by the way, not since game launch in closed beta or when Battle Pass was released necessarily. I’m not sure exactly when it was released but it’d be a weird coincidence if it happened to be the same day I started playing.

[Rixas188]

I must also add: please disregard anything I said about the bronze orders. The 3000xp system seem to be working fine now, and getting more of them than anything else.

[NomadBard]

@114488837

You can’t if the enemy team has more than 2 iq. The machine guns can just snipe people across the map due to their lack of bullet drop. The cover is almost all penetrable by bullets unless you are in a bunker, in which case a grenade ruins your day as you can’t get out in time and explosions have this ability to damage you through cover and far away.

Yeah they can snipe, too bad they don’t have scopes so they don’t see shit. Too bad that there is about 5000 ways to flank the MGs. Too bad you can snipe the MGs if you have “more then 2 IQ”. Yeah there is one mg on almost every hill. There is also about 10 players who can actually mount the MGs (not counting defending the objectibe, tanks, planes, engineers, snipers)

@114488837

Then I’m sorry, but they have 0 iq or no strategy. A decent German team could easily hold off the American advancement especially on the last 2 or so objectives, less so the first couple.

Yeah sorry, I will rather listen to 20 people with constructive feedback and myself then one person whos only argument is low IQ. Last two objectives are easy to defend? You mean the buildings that are right above US spawn, with no way for Germans to see the advance?

@114488837

Relating to the problem of the hills. The snipers and machine guns on the top of the hills have a view of the entire valley so even moving cover-to-cover is an extreme risk.

No they don’t. They simply don’t. Sure there is an MG on almost every hill. But there is by a long shot not enough people to use said MGs. Not to mention you can snipe. the. MGs. so. they. cant. be. used.

@114488837

Luck you. Never gotten more than 1. Could go absolutely ham, 1000s of XP - only get one. Maybe I’m just unlucky again, who knows.

That’s 3000 xp. And below. Have you never gotten above 3k xp? I’m sorry but at that point you should spend more time practicing and not on forums. That is the score bots have. I can loose a game horribly and still get at least 5k.

[Rixas188]

Yeah they can snipe, too bad they don’t have scopes so they don’t see shit. Too bad that there is about 5000 ways to flank the MGs. Too bad you can snipe the MGs if you have “more then 2 IQ”. Yeah there is one mg on almost every hill. There is also about 10 players who can actually mount the MGs (not counting defending the objectibe, tanks, planes, engineers, snipers)

Yeah except because either side of the valley is pure mountains [going back to the first issue] you can see people trying to outflank the machine guns from 100 miles away. Throw in the fact at the time of my actual suggestion the enemy AI were broken af they used to just 360 noscope through buildings on you, and constantly give away your location to the enemy real player squad leader, it was next to impossible.

Also MG’s don’t need scopes to snipe. With those things you can literally spray and pray and still kill 3 enemy squads. Also, If you can’t see anything with an MG I think you need to go to Specsavers’s my dude.

`Yeah sorry, I will rather listen to 20 people with constructive feedback and myself then one person whos only argument is low IQ.`

Okay. If you don’t think Low IQ is a problem then… well… I’ll refrain from saying it. Low IQ is what leads to teams winning or losing. There is no “constructive feedback” aside from what I’m suggesting - editing maps to make them more actually winnable for both sides. That is constructive criticism - the maps need fixing + I’ve said what maps and why. I literally couldn’t be anymore specific.

Last two objectives are easy to defend? You mean the buildings that are right above US spawn, with no way for Germans to see the advance?

Honestly that one isn’t difficult, but mostly the bunker[s] just before that. If your team actually play the objective often enough and only somewhat decently, the US won’t have enough reinforcements to capture that last objective where the German’s can’t see them advancing.

No they don’t. They simply don’t. Sure there is an MG on almost every hill. But there is by a long shot not enough people to use said MGs. Not to mention you can snipe. the. MGs. so. they. cant. be. used.

You can snipe them, if you live long enough to get a shot on them, yes. And there is plenty of people able to use MG’s. There is 12 people per team. 3 people can man the machineguns in the bunker [one in each direction], 2 people manning machineguns somewhere on either side of the objective and already with just 5 people on machine guns your attack is almost doomed. Throw in maybe one or two more on machine guns plus everyone else shooting at you - you’re done for.

And yeah, they do have views of the entire valley. One of them is on a hill and can see literally everything minus behind the buildings about half-way up.

That’s 3000 xp. And below. Have you never gotten above 3k xp? I’m sorry but at that point you should spend more time practicing and not on forums. That is the score bots have. I can loose a game horribly and still get at least 5k.

Ironic you claim I need more time practicing, but it’s you who is unable to read. Because I CLEARLY put “Could go absolutely ham, 1000s of XP. - only get one”. This clearly means I could get literally thousands of XP [hence, more than 6k?] and still only get one. I’m fully aware of how easy it is to get 3k, I get it like almost every match that I don’t just insta-quit - I often get more than that. But if you read, you’d see my problem is not the “high xp required”, it’s the fact I wasn’t getting ONE order PER 3k xp I got. As the system apparently was. This has now been fixed though (which you’d know if you actually read that too), so further discussion on the order situation is irrelevant.

[NomadBard]

@114488837

Yeah except because either side of the valley is pure mountains [going back to the first issue] you can see people trying to outflank the machine guns from 100 miles away.

The mountains are closer to the US spawn then to the German spawn, usually US are the ones who occupy the hills, not to mention if you go there as a German, you be on the objective. There are also ways to go there without running out in the open like the avarage player does because he is lazy to walk few more meters.

@114488837

Also MG’s don’t need scopes to snipe.

You definitely need scope to see where you are shooting.

@114488837

That is constructive criticism - the maps need fixing

Being absolutely unable to use any of the presented options to win an easy to win map is not constructive feedback.

@114488837

You can snipe them, if you live long enough to get a shot on them, yes.

“scopes”, I know you have this idea of MG gunners having the eyesight of a hawk, but the only reason MGs get so many kills, is once again because every US player walks out in the open. This is the “Low IQ” you love so much, and the US suffers from it (arguably) more then the Germans. Just lie down on the first rock you see when you spawn, and snipe. It’s impossible to see a little black silhouette on rock 500 meters away in an MG. If you miss you alert them yes, don’t be bad and don’t miss the stationary MG then.

@114488837

with just 5 people on machine guns your attack is almost doomed

From the bottom of my heart, I’ve seen 3 MGs in the bunker front survive once more then 5 minutes in my hundrets . These are the first MGs that get either sniped, or just straight up blown up by tanks, since they face frontaly. 5 people on MGs? Sniper squad has 3 snipers (if you are lazy to walk around the MGs or can’t shoot without scope) That’s 3 MGs down from a single spawn.

@114488837

And yeah, they do have views of the entire valley. One of them is on a hill and can see literally everything minus behind the buildings about half-way up.

No they don’t, you are just lazy to walk few steps around. From US perspective, the left hill can’t see behind a forest on the right. The right hill can’t see behind the small hill on the left. There are also 3 different trenches that lead up to the second and third objective.

@114488837

Ironic you claim I need more time practicing, but it’s you who is unable to read.

“iRoNiC yoU CRiTiCiZE mE bEiNG bAd aT a vIDEOgaMe but cAn’T rEaD hAhA”

Not sure how you being bad at the game is relevant to me being unable to read. Also a “I had another post right below where I explain it’s a bug” would be sufficient instead of acting like a child.

[Rixas188]

The mountains are closer to the US spawn then to the German spawn, usually US are the ones who occupy the hills, not to mention if you go there as a German, you be on the objective. There are also ways to go there without running out in the open like the avarage player does because he is lazy to walk few more meters.

The mountains literally cover the entire valley’s flanks. What do you mean “closer to the US” are you smoking crack?

You definitely need scope to see where you are shooting.
Not with the MG42’s. No Bullet drop +/ insane accuracy and lack of skill doesn’t require one. I’ve seen people using the MG42’s like halfway up the valley and killling people on the beach.

Being absolutely unable to use any of the presented options to win an easy to win map is not constructive feedback.

That’s the point I was making to the other guy - just because YOU are super tryhard at the game and always get a really competent US team and a braindead German team, does NOT make the map fine. For the 99% of the community who aren’t as lucky as you, some things are broken. If all you have to say is “it’s fine I never encounter the issue” there is no reason for you to be here. Furtheremore, you saying you never encounter issues is not constructive feedback either - which is very hypocritical.

“scopes”, I know you have this idea of MG gunners having the eyesight of a hawk, but the only reason MGs get so many kills, is once again because every US player walks out in the open. This is the “Low IQ” you love so much, and the US suffers from it (arguably) more then the Germans. Just lie down on the first rock you see when you spawn, and snipe. It’s impossible to see a little black silhouette on rock 500 meters away in an MG. If you miss you alert them yes, don’t be bad and don’t miss the stationary MG then.

I find it very ironic you call me bad at the game, yet you are the one unable to see people 5 feet in front of you. From First Bunker objective to very rear objective is basically a clear line of sight. You don’t need to see an entire person to know they are there, hell at long distances with an MG42 you can just shoot at a pixel and thanks to it’s high accuracy you’ll still hit them.

From the bottom of my heart, I’ve seen 3 MGs in the bunker front survive once more then 5 minutes in my hundrets . These are the first MGs that get either sniped, or just straight up blown up by tanks, since they face frontaly. 5 people on MGs? Sniper squad has 3 snipers (if you are lazy to walk around the MGs or can’t shoot without scope) That’s 3 MGs down from a single spawn.

Yeah… okay. I’ve never seen those MG’s get destroyed from a shot outside the bunker, as both German’s and US. I’ve only ever seen them get destroyed from grenades. This is where the intelligence argument comes in again - if the German’s on the machine guns actually shoot at the enemies on the beach, it’s highly unlikely they’ll get destroyed. A friend of mine actually stayed on one of those first bunker machine guns the ENTIRE game - never got killed, never got destroyed.

No they don’t, you are just lazy to walk few steps around. From US perspective, the left hill can’t see behind a forest on the right. The right hill can’t see behind the small hill on the left. There are also 3 different trenches that lead up to the second and third objective.

Trenches in which the enemy can see your head because they aren’t tall enough. Trenches which slope uphill, allowing them to just snipe you as you come up. Yeah, those very effective trenches. As for the forest, it’s not that difficult to see people moving on the other side of those trees. Again, for someone who claims to be better at the game, you seem really bad at spotting people. And it’s not laziness not being able to do the impossible. You also have to remember, if German’s have a 1IQ+ player, they’ll have someone on that very hill you are talking about, who you either kill and then give away your position and flanking, or who kills you in which case RIP.

“iRoNiC yoU CRiTiCiZE mE bEiNG bAd aT a vIDEOgaMe but cAn’T rEaD hAhA”
Imagine not being able to take criticism lol. And you call me a child. Sigh. Gotta love those hyprocites. Once again out in full force destroying video game communities. Imagine posting a shitty image because you have literally zero relevant information to add to this conversation and are only here to troll and be toxic…

Not sure how you being bad at the game is relevant to me being unable to read. Also a “I had another post right below where I explain it’s a bug” would be sufficient instead of acting like a child.

You’re not sure how being bad at the game is relevant to you being unable to read? Ah. Sigh. That just proves you aren’t reading what I am saying then - because I did explain this. I did clearly explain how it’s not being bad at the game to point out flaws in that game. And I also explained how if you actually read my many previous comments, you’d know half of your points are either already concluded on or irrelevant. But nah, keep posting random images and being butthurt about your inability to read and contribute to a valid argument, I’m doing fine over here. You aren’t getting under my skin by calling me bad at the game, because I know I top the team by miles almost every time. But hey - how dare I suggest gameplay improvements to help lower-ability and mid-ability players… it’s treasonous talk!

[NomadBard]

@114488837

The mountains literally cover the entire valley’s flanks. What do you mean “closer to the US” are you smoking crack?

Yeah, the crack is called “playing for both teams and seeing stuff for myself instead of crying on the forum.”

@114488837

No Bullet drop +/ insane accuracy

My point was you don’t see enemy snipers. How does good accuracy help you against 10 snipers 500 meters away if you can’t see them. You sound like the person who constantly runs frontally against the MG and cries it kills him.

@114488837

I’ve seen people using the MG42’s like halfway up the valley and killling people on the beach.

Yeah, I forgot running on the plain beach is a good cover. Almost as if the US players are punished for walking straight to the objective instead of flanking.

@114488837

That’s the point I was making to the other guy - just because YOU are super tryhard at the game and always get a really competent US team and a braindead German team, does NOT make the map fine. For the 99% of the community who aren’t as lucky as you, some things are broken. If all you have to say is “it’s fine I never encounter the issue” there is no reason for you to be here. Furtheremore, you saying you never encounter issues is not constructive feedback either - which is very hypocritical.

I don’t tryhard I play casually, this is like the 3rd shooter game I’ve ever played. I have about 300 hours as the Axis and 100 as the US. I win almost every game as the US on d-day with much worse equipment. I lost half the games as Germany with a maxed out gear. 99% community? How fat are you to amount for 99%. I’ve already stated that people complained about the US being too strong on this map every week. Not me, the community. If everyone was crying about US being too weak I’d be silent, but this is the other way around. You are alone on this. Majority people think the map is fine, and the minority that thinks that it’s unbalanced are mostly people who think US has the upper hand. I’m not here to cry about the map, that’s why I don’t need to give constructive criticism about the map, I’m however giving constructive criticism about your arguments, because they are based on personal experience of a person who refuses to adapt to a map.

@114488837

I find it very ironic you call me bad at the game, yet you are the one unable to see people 5 feet in front of you. From First Bunker objective to very rear objective is basically a clear line of sight. You don’t need to see an entire person to know they are there, hell at long distances with an MG42 you can just shoot at a pixel and thanks to it’s high accuracy you’ll still hit them.

Just 5 sentences back, you were complaining that MGs shoot people from across the map, now you are being a smart ass about how it’s 5 feet. Which is it my dude. Which is it. If it’s clear line of sight THEN WALK AROUND.

@114488837

Yeah… okay. I’ve never seen those MG’s get destroyed from a shot outside the bunker, as both German’s and US. I’ve only ever seen them get destroyed from grenades. This is where the intelligence argument comes in again - if the German’s on the machine guns actually shoot at the enemies on the beach, it’s highly unlikely they’ll get destroyed. A friend of mine actually stayed on one of those first bunker machine guns the ENTIRE game - never got killed, never got destroyed.

??? Once again you are either trolling, or lying. Or maybe you only saw the map in a youtube video? The MGs don’t get destroyed from the outside? Huh? Every thread regarding MGs, every video about D day map, every person I’ve ever talked to about it, every single match I play on the map, everyone always talks about shooting the MGs. And here you are. “well I never saw that” Then open your eyes I guess. I can’t really argue with you if you just make stuff up.

@114488837

Trenches in which the enemy can see your head because they aren’t tall enough.

press CTRL. It makes you crouch. I learnt that in tutorial.

@114488837

Trenches which slope uphill, allowing them to just snipe you as you come up.

Yeah, you don’t get a completely safe path all the way to the objective. Unbalanced very much. No Pershing to hold my hand and escort me to the objective, unbalanced.

@114488837

As for the forest, it’s not that difficult to see people moving on the other side of those trees. Again, for someone who claims to be better at the game, you seem really bad at spotting people.

For someone who got so salty for being called bad at the game, you don’t seem to know the map so well. Spot me that guy in that sandbag bunker, spot me that guy behind the slope in the blind spot, spot me that guy in a dense bush area while 10 snipers are trying to take you out from your own bunkers.

@114488837

ou also have to remember, if German’s have a 1IQ+ player, they’ll have someone on that very hill you are talking about

No they won’t. It further away for the Germans, it’s halfway into the grey zone, and it’s in a blind spot right above US spawn.

@114488837

Imagine not being able to take criticism lol.

Wait. Are… Am I actually getting trolled? I called you out for saying dumb stuff and your response childish passive aggressive lash out. And when I use literally the same sentence and turn it against you, you criticize me for not being able to take criticism? How little self aware can you be Jesus.

@114488837

Once again out in full force destroying video game communities. Imagine posting a shitty image because you have literally zero relevant information to add to this conversation and are only here to troll and be toxic…

I’m being trolled. It’s a bait, I fell right into the bait. My dumb ass thought he was serious and it was but a troll all along. You are describing yourself in that sentence you know that right? You are the one who started being aggressive, who acted like he’s better then everyone first. You do know that right?

@114488837

You’re not sure how being bad at the game is relevant to you being unable to read? Ah. Sigh. That just proves you aren’t reading what I am saying then - because I did explain this. I did clearly explain how it’s not being bad at the game to point out flaws in that game. And I also explained how if you actually read my many previous comments, you’d know half of your points are either already concluded on or irrelevant. But nah, keep posting random images and being butthurt about your inability to read and contribute to a valid argument, I’m doing fine over here. You aren’t getting under my skin by calling me bad at the game, because I know I top the team by miles almost every time. But hey - how dare I suggest gameplay improvements to help lower-ability and mid-ability players… it’s treasonous talk!

I’m just gonna kill myself over this. I’ve either met the world’s most hypocritical 10 year old or got baited by one of the greatest baits I’ve ever witnessed. For the sake of my hope in humanity, I will take the second option.

You are the minority in thinking US needs buff on this map. MGs are not a problem at all. The map gives the US players more flanking opportunities then to the Germans. You are more and more aggressive and butthurt throughout the thread and less and less self aware. I’m gonna call this thread a huge troll and mute it, because otherwise my mental health will rapidly deteriorate.

[ViiK]

Imho, Normandy is already largely rigged to make it easier for Allies. Yet there are people who find it hard to play. We do need some sort of players statistics like in WT because I can’t believe that all people in this thread ever tried playing on German side…

[Rixas188]

My Germans for Normandy are 3x higher than for Allies, what’s your point there exactly?

[Rixas188]

Yeah, the crack is called “playing for both teams and seeing stuff for myself instead of crying on the forum.”

Imagine thinking people suggesting improvements to the game and then dealing with butthurt disagreers in the comments is “crying on the forums” lmao what a childish notion. And Yes I have played both teams regularly on D-Day map. Your crude drawings on a snippet of the map don’t prove anything considering none of the arrows are of equal length, equal angle or of equal proportion.

My point was you don’t see enemy snipers. How does good accuracy help you against 10 snipers 500 meters away if you can’t see them. You sound like the person who constantly runs frontally against the MG and cries it kills him.

How can you not see them lol. You sound like someone who gets killed by every person on their team then cries “omg hacker omg lag omg omg hacks!!!”.

Yeah, I forgot running on the plain beach is a good cover. Almost as if the US players are punished for walking straight to the objective instead of flanking.

Lmao you do realise the bunker on the left [from German perspective] can literally see all three entrances to the beginning bunker objective? Doesn’t matter which direction you come from lmao.

I don’t tryhard I play casually, this is like the 3rd shooter game I’ve ever played. I have about 300 hours as the Axis and 100 as the US. I win almost every game as the US on d-day with much worse equipment. I lost half the games as Germany with a maxed out gear. 99% community? How fat are you to amount for 99%. I’ve already stated that people complained about the US being too strong on this map every week. Not me, the community. If everyone was crying about US being too weak I’d be silent, but this is the other way around. You are alone on this. Majority people think the map is fine, and the minority that thinks that it’s unbalanced are mostly people who think US has the upper hand. I’m not here to cry about the map, that’s why I don’t need to give constructive criticism about the map, I’m however giving constructive criticism about your arguments, because they are based on personal experience of a person who refuses to adapt to a map.

Haha fat jokes because you have nothing intelligent to say. How funny. And this is literally where you become a hypocrite. Because when I mention things from my perspective and experience, it’s me “crying on the forums” but you mentioning your experiences it’s totally okay there. So what… your opinion is more valuable than others or…

If everyone was crying about US being too weak I’d be silent, but this is the other way around.

Yeah they’re not. It’s just most people don’t bother making a thread on the forums because people like you randomly get butthurt by it and go out of your way to be a dickhead to them just because you disagree. If you truly played 400+ hours of Normandy, you’d have noticed that in almost every game like two people quit from the US side before the game even gets proper underway, because they know it’s just biased towards the Germans. " Majority people think the map is fine" WoW yOuR sO fAt YoU cOuNt As ThE mAjOrItY oF pEoPlE. So when I say “majority” or “99%” ‘without evidence’ its a no-no but when you do it it’s totally fine. Got it. Hypocrisy at it’s finest. “I’m not here to cry about the map,” seems like exactly what you are doing, crying about how it’s too biased for the Americans, not the Germans.

Just 5 sentences back, you were complaining that MGs shoot people from across the map, now you are being a smart ass about how it’s 5 feet. Which is it my dude. Which is it. If it’s clear line of sight THEN WALK AROUND.

Lmao it’s called an insult, I get your brain is too dopey to even recognize that.

? ??? Once again you are either trolling, or lying. Or maybe you only saw the map in a youtube video? The MGs don’t get destroyed from the outside? Huh? Every thread regarding MGs, every video about D day map, every person I’ve ever talked to about it, every single match I play on the map, everyone always talks about shooting the MGs. And here you are. “well I never saw that” Then open your eyes I guess. I can’t really argue with you if you just make stuff up.

Ah so there’s that personal experience hypocisy again. So you accounting your experiences is totally okay, then when I say what I’ve seen it’s a no-no, I must be “lying” "make[ing] stuff up] right. No, I’ve played the game for many hours now and rarely do machine guns get destroyed by shooting at them. It is a game mechanic yes, and it does happen, but it’s not the “saving grace of the game” because if you get a clear enough shot to shoot the machine gun, the person on the machine gun often has a clear enough shoot to shoot you - and his gun shoots a lot faster than yours does. Also “I can’t really argue with you” oh so you’re the troll? Just here to argue? Because that shouldn’t be “argue” it should be “talk to and disagree with politely”.

press CTRL. It makes you crouch. I learnt that in tutorial.

Okay you actually must be a troll. You can see people’s head in the trenches lmao, whilst they are crouching, especially if you are at a downward angle because say half the map is higher than the other half.

Yeah, you don’t get a completely safe path all the way to the objective. Unbalanced very much. No Pershing to hold my hand and escort me to the objective, unbalanced.

I never said there should be, once again making up whatever you wanna make up to fuel your own agenda. I am saying that both paths are completely unpassable unless you travel all the way around the side of the map, at which point why are the allies even attacking the Germans full frontal if they can just go around them and encircle them first. I never asked for a hand-holding, once again making shit up to fuel your own BS. There is a difference between a biased frontal assault fix and giving a safe path. Learn it.

For someone who got so salty for being called bad at the game, you don’t seem to know the map so well. Spot me that guy in that sandbag bunker, spot me that guy behind the slope in the blind spot, spot me that guy in a dense bush area while 10 snipers are trying to take you out from your own bunkers.

Lmao okay. Sure I’ll spot them on the grainy 140p picture you uploaded a 10th of the monitor resolution. Imagine calling me salty yet you are literally so butthurt you got disagreed with. And I know the map very well thank you, I don’t know if you noticed but a tree isn’t a single solid object, there is actually gaps in the branches you can see people through - and bullets will go through the leaves. If you are too dumb to take advantage of that, don’t blame me or the bad map design.

No they won’t. It further away for the Germans, it’s halfway into the grey zone, and it’s in a blind spot right above US spawn.

Sure, okay.

Wait. Are… Am I actually getting trolled? I called you out for saying dumb stuff and your response childish passive aggressive lash out. And when I use literally the same sentence and turn it against you, you criticize me for not being able to take criticism? How little self aware can you be Jesus.

From the guy literally saying fat jokes, I find this paragraph to be more than hypocritical, but rather purely idiotic. You didn’t call me out for saying “dumb stuff”, you got butthurt and started to argue because someone was of a different opinion to you. I don’t think replying to someone because of it is childish passive agressive lash out as much as calling someone bad at the game or calling them fat. And you clearly are unable to take criticism, hence the fat jokes and the random insults you started throwing first.

I’m just gonna kill myself over this. I’ve either met the world’s most hypocritical 10 year old or got baited by one of the greatest baits I’ve ever witnessed. For the sake of my hope in humanity, I will take the second option.

Again, childish age insult because you have nothing intelligent to say. And again, ironic use of the word “hyprocritical” there considering that’s literally the one thing you have been consistently throughout. As for the “greatest baits in history” - you were the one who unnecessarily began sprouting random BS because you were butthurt someone was of a different opinion to you. You were the one who aggressively disagreed with map design chances, not me.

You are the minority in thinking US needs buff on this map. MGs are not a problem at all. The map gives the US players more flanking opportunities then to the Germans. You are more and more aggressive and butthurt throughout the thread and less and less self aware. I’m gonna call this thread a huge troll and mute it, because otherwise my mental health will rapidly deteriorate.

If anyone non-ironically says the US are over-powered on this map then they must be really terrible German players. Maybe if those braindead soybeans stopped standing next to the objective instead of on it when enemies are capturing it, maybe they’d fair a bit better against the US.
The map gives the US ONE flanking route, which can easily be intercepted by any German who knows the map. Again, “You are more and more aggressive and butthurt throughout the thread and less and less self aware.” congratulations on describing yourself in one sentence there.
“I’m gonna call this thread a huge troll and mute it, because otherwise my mental health will rapidly deteriorate.” Oh so you admit you are a troll? Nice. Imagine being so toxic that you are giving yourself mental health issues though.

[NomadBard]

[Rixas188]

Okay, cry me a river kid. It’s an open thread still, with suggestions in it. There is no statue of limitations on a thread. If you don’t want people replying to you, don’t reply in it yourself, simple as.

And I care about it, so it’s not “no-one”.
hOw FaT ArE yOu ThAt YoU cOuNt As EvErYoNe.

And again, this meme just proves me right in saying you’re just childish, not the other way around.

You [about “getting mail” from a 2month old topic] also said you muted the topic…

And if you lied about that… what else did you lie about? Just about everything I’d guess.

[Rixas188]

Also notice how you didn’t respond to any accusation either - because you know it to be true, you just don’t want to keep up your BS any longer in case you accidentally let that slip. It can’t be anything else - seeing how previously you were so vigorously defending the “truth”, now you just give up and walk away? Because you know it’s not the truth.

Also I don’t get your calling it a rant on my end if you’ll just call it a rant from your end too. What, was that meant to be a failed insult that backfired and insulted your self too? Also if people “replying” to you “prov[es] [your] point further” than you have a deluded sense of how discussions work pal, and just shows your child mind has not developed beyond the age of 10.

[NomadBard]

[Rixas188]