1-France-England and Italy should have their own campaigns (in my opinion, this would make the game playable by different players)
2-In the more distant future, the best way to expand is will be the Korean War
(Battle of Shanghai is also a good opportunity)
(will be perfect for asians)
(This campaign should be added in Turkey_it attracts a lot of Turkish players to the game
MY CAMPAQİNG İDEAS
1-WW2 Battle Of Paris
2-Battle Of Britain
3-Dunkirk
4-Monte Cassino
5-Allied İnvasion of İtaly
6-El Alemen
7-İwo Jima
8-Okinawa
9-Battle Of Shangai
10-Batlle of wake İsland
11-Battle Of Leningrad
12-Ardennes
13-Korean war
5 Likes
No Korean War. This game should and needs to stay WW2 exclusively.
4 Likes
Other than the Korean War, I agree everything else should be added!
1 Like
the most important point ppl here miss is that future campaigns mainly depend on how the playerbase is distributed. depending on how many player play certain factions, you can match them up against a new faction. this excludes many matchups that sound good in theory, but would end up with imbalanced due to too few players on one side, also secondary effects on other matchups, since creating japs vs sov requires a large enough soviet playerbase on low and mid BR, otherwise the queuing lobbies will be empty.
1 Like
SKS-45 (7.62x41 compared to the sks-31 which fires 7.62x54R) it was apparently field tested in the war but it would be a good br 2 weapon since it’s less than 10 damage and has a stripper clip reload but gets 10 rounds
1 Like
I think after ww2 has been exhausted then other wars should be implemented, but under no circumstance should 1 wars que mix with another’s que. For example no cold war soviets Vs ww2 Germans.
1 Like
This game already has Ardennes, maybe more maps within it but they don’t need to add a campaign they’ve already added.
As for going beyond world war II into Korean war, for some it may be tempting but it’ll destroy the delicate balance that’s already completely unbalanced within this game This would only make it worse.
If anything I think campaigns leading up to December 31st 1945 should be as far out as they go. Not much in terms of equipment would have changed in the four or so months that the war ended. I’m saying this because in early August 1945 is when they drop the atomic bombs and Japan surrendered, As for Germany they gave up in May 1945.
When it comes to everything else on this list I’m all for it! Go ahead and add the maps but we don’t need any more new factions The player bases already spread thin enough.
2 Likes
Yes and I would NOT be opposed to that. The issue is that this game is BR based now, so if Korean/Cold War was to be implemented, they would be “BR 6-7-8”. If they did a COLD WAR option which was an ENTIRELY different matchmaking. I would support it 110%.
World of Tanks console has done this. They have “WW2” and “Cold War”. (WoT has Cold War stuff in ww2 which kinda sucks).
1 Like
makes sense since ww2 equipment went into the 60s and beyond with my favorite modification being a sherman armed with a 60mm gun firing apdsfs
1 Like
There were no real battles in Paris, at least not on the scale as Enlisted would require.
What?
Already in the game.
Turkey never actively participated in WW2.