I don’t know why everyone is saying they will be useless, they will be pretty nice in the eventual low BR.
I feel like low BR will mostly just be seal clubbers and sandbaggers.
AA truck has same gun.
I think a decent amount of people might opt for low to mid BR if high BR is too cancerous. I love the FG-42 II but I don’t want it to be the only thing I ever use.
Wouldn’t surprise me at all actually, due to we know, high tier, consider 10 v 10 real players not fun.
Yes, i want all wt SPAA
OTOMATIC/OTOMAGIC for Tunisia 
1 Like
“If you throw enough soldiers at the bullets, eventually they will run out of bullets.” - Soviet strategist
2 Likes
I don’t agree with him but I’m biased
2 Likes
Ok, I don’t have more (of this particular kind) 
2 Likes
Whenever I build an HMG to defend a cap.
3 Likes
Oh I can see this being a permanent slot in my deck. Love spaa’s…i wonder what ammunition will be in the belt…
Hopefully it doesnt have to compete with my flame tank (also permenant slot)
As for liabilities. Gear/equipment arent liabilities…players in how they use are. Generally i hate snipers, but if you get a super aggressive sniper its a sight to behold.
1 Like
T-60 drivers are already a liability in Moscow. This SPAA is even more of a liability where instead of letting someone with a T-34 use the slot, its shitty vehicles like that truck or the T-60. It reminds me of why I prefer a Panzer IV over a bike.
Atleast paratroopers are more useful than those.
Are their gun will be useable against infantry and other vehicles?
If not they are useless
Even if they are usefull against land targets, they will end up as m13
The difference is that you cant build truck out of your ass without any restrictions, nor will it have super stats and you can kill it far better than those old spongy flaks with their magic force fields (at least by looking at the truck).
'And they also wont waste a tanker slot (in case it will get a tanker slot).
1 Like
very realistic indeed!
1 Like
That’s War Thunder 1.0BR in a shellnut.
2 Likes