yeah its GOOD
it’s still a massively noticeable improvement. but i guess if they fixed moving dispersion all the ‘muh reelism’ nerds would start crying about ‘run and gun’ (in an arcade shooter) again
Man, that brings back memories. CoD World at War. My first online FPS experience. Running around on Seelow heights, tearing them up with the PPSh.
Our recon plane vill find zem!
I miss that dark and gritty atmosphere of Berlin from that game and my itch of this experience happened to be partly scratched in Enlisted minus some missing features like storming the Reichstag building or fighting in the Ubahn and at times the weather is too sunny without the fog or smog there as a result it doesn’t have the completely dark feel of the battle.
I also miss Reznov yelling at me to do things for him all the time, too. lol
Sure, they just need to actually fix bipods so they can raise the recoil a lot.
@116086931
As with above, dispersion is stupid, fix bipods add recoil.
I use the RD-44 in Berlin and previously it dispersed so badly that it could only be used against enemy soldiers within 3 meters.
Now it is quite easy to use.
lmao look at these big brains still playing the ape as if the requested era immersion = 100% real-life weapon mechanics
ooga “no 1 life per war already not historical so now king tiger in moscow is ok” booga
2 Likes
Ydah just look at those hyper realistic games such as BFV or HnG with their MMG meta… or working bipods.
2 Likes
Even bloody Payday2 has better LMGs than what we have.
I find the RD-44 dispersion silly considering its using 7.62x39mm instead of the usual 7.62x54mmR like the DPs use. I havent tested it with the new dispersion yet.
1 Like
two dead crappy games aren’t the best comparison
i’m not talking about historical accuracy with my post, but way to prove a point i wasn’t even making rofl
BFV is less dead than Enlisted. Is more alive than current BF.
2 Likes
don’t care, it’s normie trash
Not like Enlisted…
1 Like
no, enlisted is pretty esoteric. you just implied enlisted was dead yourself
Admittedly, I rarely see game run by devs who are too incompetent for MG bipods.
Yeah, I guess one-sided campaigns (in case you actually find enough plebs for the better side as well) and changing the entire game concepts for the sake of merging the remaining players together is a sign of a healthy game.
like what? pacific has calmed down now fewer people are ginding for the squad which can use chi-ha-kai. i haven’t noticed this. in fact i’ve noticed the playerbase size increase.
it’s future proofing. it’s simple maths, adding new campaigns and continually splitting players across 6+ campaigns (each with two sides) AND three server regions will naturally destroy your playerbase if it isn’t galactically large. it’s not a sign of dead game.
Luckily we only have Pacific.
Hmm When I remember people stating that the devs said everything was fine. Sames when people begged them not to make more campaigns. I remember when we had two campaigns and Normandy was one-sided where the devs didn’t bother to change the entire concept.
And now we are here.