What a beuty!

4 Likes

eh… a bit weird to see bt7s on stalingrad…

but cool nevertheless.

( even though i was hoping for the SU 76 )

2 Likes

At least is not another t34

which speaking off,

it’s kinda ““funny”” how there are 3 t34s, and those are all for full owner access only :upside_down_face:

1 Like

Actually is strange because the kv1 remain better than all of them :thinking:

i mean, placement of weapons and vehicle is casual af.

cuz… if you ( df ) was going to put kv and stugs, why put the kv first, and stug later.

their equivalent aren’t… that equivalent at all.

3 Likes

it is .

not a single reason to use it over t34 tho x)

well. there is, for f2p players is a must have.

I can agree a lot, like the ww1 carcano in tunisia leater in the grind instead of the ww2 carcano

2 Likes

those people should be fired…

especially the guy that decided to put a pz III against a t34 :upside_down_face: (5th in the campaign btw )

6 Likes

Like the t34 is the best soviet tank and f2p dont have something better :rofl:

You can use it for a single motive is at level of end game german tank

1 Like

I’ll definitely use it even having full access and maxed kv and t34s… this bt7 is an oddity. I love bizzare, decent but not too powerful weaponry. I hope it retains some of it’s trademark speed even with a much heavier turret and canon :thinking:

1 Like

I already used it, it OHK a stug frontally

Not surprisingly, as it has the same gun as the kv and t34 :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

It’s why I don’t mind using a glass canon such as this. As long as it’s still a bit fast.

1 Like

Speedy Punchy Boi

I would be fine with it, if they had chosen the PzKpfw. III J1 (introduced 12/41) with the 5cm L/60 AND the electric turret drive. Even balancewise that would have been a good decision.

1 Like

I think the Devs can throw in a PzII J into Stalingrad to combat it !

that would be the war thunder team since the panzer3 J1, current end line tank, is expected to fight the t-34(1940,41 and 42), the m4(with m61 and stabilizer), m4a1(with m61 and stabilizer), m4a3 with the 105, and m4a4 (with m61 and stabilizer) without armor penetration indictor to help spot a target that can be 500m out or in a thick bush line with only it’s stock shells. this is just the medium tanks that it has to fight with it also seeing a stabilized chaffees, the KV series (yes that includes the infamous KV-2) and a churchill.

yes please!

yesterday i played my first match with a pz2, after all this time i wanted to know.lol

i srsly destroyed a t50 with it and i dont remmebr the last time i had such a laugh playing this game.

pure madness that pz2.

10/10 will pz2 again.

rn i will be a stug chad in stalingrad, coz im tired of pz3’s and 4’s.

on other hand, i srsly want to see a pz2 “luchs”… one of my fav vehicles in heroes and generals. maybe one day will come here.

3 Likes

yes, but actually no.

i don’t think we should take another game “balance” and force it here.

above all, it’s not like the german army only had PZ IIIs and PZ IVs during 1941?

we could use the marder III ( the gray one with machinegun ), the panzer jeager I, the 88 truck, the 50mm halftrack,

you know, having something different beside the same thing.

i don’t recall the russians using 5/4 variants of the same tank, that’s plain boring. hence, why they got more viariety, which it’s what imo germany axis tanks lacks.

i’d rather have no armor but good gun. so far… beside the PZ J1, all the others don’t have much regarding those aspects.

End line panzer III is panzer 3M or N much better than panzer 3j1