yep, but sadly, I believe they will do some kind of premium thing like with War Thunder.
tho ill admit I did jump on that Ka-50 purchase bandwagon.
you look through binoculars and steer it.
Not a particular Wishlist but a suggestion re. the Weapons Delivery mechanic I think that system should be swapped out for a similar mechanic in regards to weapons and ammunition as is available in War Thunder for instance when a particular squad unlocks the use of grenades explosives etc. rather than relying upon a hit or miss system where your never sure if you get what you want simply place a in game currency cost on each deployment of said weapon for instance a M82 APHE shell in War thunder may cost X amount of Silver Lions in this a similar mechanic could be introduced for the introduction of equipment. such as each squad is by default capable of carrying Med packs but as they become more experienced they unlock the ability to carry grenades, explosives Molotov etc. and weapons could also be purchased on demand for instance a squad may begin outfitted entirely with stock weapons but provided they have been unlocked the player is capable of purchasing better equipment with a Silver Lion equivalent. sorry if this is the wrong feed if so please direct me there.
I agree with adding battle rifles but giving germany their PPSh is just too much
Edit: some sources say Suomi was even better than PPSh because it was not made in the rush like PPSh which will make Germany even more broken than it is now. You need to think about the other side even if you only play germans
So you dont only want everyone to suffer through 3+ months of progression, but also go broke while doing so unless you supplement the ingame currency with real money?
IRL you never paid for equipment refills. Heck if you could prove the grenades you ran out of killed a bunch of people, you would get a medal.
Good idea, let’s add this bad boy to our lineup when possible! I’m fine with it being either a premium squad exclusive gun or a standard German gun, as long as we get it. I wouldn’t mind some 1939 campaigns either, Poland vs. both the Germans AND Soviets on the same side would be particularly interesting to see.
It wouldn’t really make sense, both from a gameplay standpoint and a historical one. Germany and Russia weren’t exactly on the same side, they just took advantage of eachothers’ actions to gobble up land.
It would be like having 3 teams with 2 sets of objectives where the 2 attacking teams can’t attack eachother but do contest points separately.
Granted “who can capture more points first” would be kindof fun from Germany and Russia’s perspective, Poland wouldn’t have a playerbase.
Poland did have some neat tankettes and AT rifles though. Gib premiums. I will whale on meme squads.
1 Like
Yes the Suomi KP was superior to the PPSh, it was built as a quality weapon, it was somewhat heavy tho but it could shoot very fast with very little recoil.
Personally I think it should come to Axis Faction as premium unit, possibly as Detachment Törni unit. That way it would stay as more of a rare weapon.
Althrough Germany historically was a official user of it, even before WW2.
And as I said, Suomi is just too good for Enlisted.
This game already lacks difference between teams and giving Germans a better PPD is going to destroy the only advantage Soviets have
Judging from your profile picture, I totally understand you and I know how painful it is to not get your nation’s weapon in Enlisted.
There is a chance I could agree with you if we receive one of these systems I suggested:
If we get something like in these suggestions, Suomi could be a super rare weapon only obtainable by ONE soldier in ONE squad
Suomi and Lahti Saloranta 26 are already in the games files. Also M28 (finnish mosin).
There was a conversation about the possible balance of the Suomi on the Finnish channel on the Discord server. The conclusion of it was that the 9x19mm Parabellum that the Suomi used was, in fact, weaker than the 7,62 Tokarev, so it would have a bit less recoil, as much ammo, and similar maybe slower firerate with slightly less damage
The Suomi was more reliable than the PPSh and PPD because of the far better quality control on the magazines, but that’s as far as it gets.
wtf bro you want kv t34 but cant give german a good smg?
1 Like
MP-41 is the BEST smg
Plus as I already said
I support asymmetrical balance and I would love to see it more
If both teams share similar weapons, there won’t be any reason to play the other team
That’s why I was against adding captured Panzerschreck in Berlin playtest
Thats why I want Suomi to be very rare
That’s true but the problem is in Enlisted, 9x19mm Parabellum deals more damage than the 7,62 Tokarev.
I don’t want Suomi out of Enlisted, in fact I actually would love to see it in Enlisted but I’m just concerned with the current weapon reward system which will make it either p2w or everyone will be armed with them.
Again, I would like to see Suomi used if we had systems like the ones I suggested so the weapon will have quantity limits
i am ok with quantity limits if every single weapon is quantity limited and we can see a lot of different weapons in a single squad which will be immersion breaking i still love your idea about better squads
I think quantity limits are a good idea that the game can’t support yet without reworking the entire reserve and progression system.
For example I have a relatively small number of explosives and medkits, but all of the soldiers I actually bring into battle have an excess of both because when I send one to the reserve, I strip their equipment out.
1 Like
i carry 4-5 grenades on some of my soldiers
That’s what I’m getting at.
Having a limit of 21 STGs would mean nothing if all 21 are in the 3 active infantry squads.
Just for the sake of the argument.
i will be happy if only 2 guys in my squad carry a stg…this will reduce meat grinder
At the very low end of the scale it would work, sure, but it doesn’t scale well. Weapon limits would functionally be all-or-nothing.
Maybe only very specific weapons should be limited.