Your were thoroughly fooled, then.
Removing something readily available for everyone, is not a reward, even if it’s painted as such.
Seems devs gambit worked to a degree when they removed the access pack…
Well I did gain something, until the kp31 was added I had access to a high capacity smg for Germany, and now the kp31 has been added I have a exclusive weapon with slightly different stats that shows I stuck by the game.
You didn’t get something by the removal of it for others.
It’s why devs succeed in fooling you when they claimed it was “a reward”.
Look. I bought between 30 to 40 captured ppsh. 40 m93 mannlichers. 6 Breda for Soviets. 20 Thompsons for Soviets.
I already had all those. That the devs removed access to those for other players, DID NOT give ME anything.
They just removed something. That’s it. They removed the massive discount we had access to. And the possibility to buy more of those.
I’ll make a note to follow up on this along with cross-referencing from some of my other materials.
I want to pre order the SPAA package but I’m worried that if you release a TT line that the premium squad will be outclassed.
I’ve never bought a package like this in game so I don’t want to feel like I’m paying money to get ripped on later down the line.
Is there going to be any form of a Tech Tree SPAA vehicles added into the game? I don’t want to miss out but I also am not sure what they will be down the road etc. it’s hard to want to plan around buying something without fear of missing out and also being unaware of future developments in game.
I mean if it like before then there should be an event version but idk if it would be all faction or not. As for TT this one is hard to guess tbh. (paratrooper didnt get TT version so yeah)
STZ having Jagdpanzer IV L48 like frontal armor is without a doubt an upgrade over TT T34, luckily KV1 is OP, so it doesn’t matter.
No, you can feel superior because others dont have it, like some rich asshole. Or feel good because playing this godforsaken game since at least 2023 wasnt a total waste of time.
You sure those numbers are not from a post-WW2 version of this shell? Soviet wartime HEAT (called ‘armor-burning’) shells usually only achieved penetration of the length about the same as their caliber.
https://pamyat-naroda.ru/documents/view/?id=451216306&backurl
Page 5 of this document from 1944 instructs that BP-460A ‘armor-burning’ shell must be used against targets of armor thickness of under 100mm, when used from similar 122mm M30 field howitzer
Why order such a restriction on a shell supposedly capable of penetrating 160mm?
https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/ivagkin/26880913/673207/673207_original.jpg
Another report (at 5th point) shows that firing at Tiger II 150mm front armor at 200m failed to penetrate, only leaving scratches.
Eheh true that, I didn’t think of that because I don’t suffer from that complex I suppose 
In a way, it’s the same thing. You’re the only ones who have access to the percentages of “what people are using.” When you see that it’s being used less than the Na-To, you’ll lower the Nashorn’s BR to BR3, regardless of how good or bad it is. The same thing happened with the Stug and the Marders. It was never about utility, but rather how much people actually use the things you introduce to the game. (This isn’t a complaint, it’s just one way of looking at it.)
I basically don’t tank at all, so I don’t get into these discussions about shell types and reload times etc, but it seems to me that there are tanks that are just better on paper = better in practice, which means there’s only 1 good tank per BR.
I do fly some, and i feel it’s not as cut and dry with planes. Loadout is obviously important, but things like climb speed, turn speed, and the intagible just…“feel” of the plane means someone might play better with a “less good” plane if it works for them. I’m too green with tanks to know, but does that type of thing even translate to tanks, or is there just a best one?
The equivalent is probably tank destroyers vs tanks. It’s all about preference. Better performance against other tanks, infantry or an all rounder. If you want turret rotation or a fixed larger caliber gun. Smaller caliber but with coaxial machine guns, mobility vs armour ect. Normally to take one vehicle you sacrifice in a department but excel in another.
As long as you invest money in Enlisted, you won’t regret it. Even if there are duplicate weapons and items in the future weapon tech tree, you’ll still have a historical collection squad. That’s the only difference.
I’d like to ask if the Beretta M1918 Assault Squad and the Italian M13 Light Tank Squad, which have been unavailable for a long time, will be re-released in the store with a discount and available for a limited time after this update?
When they removed the ability to get the pass you still had to grind through the weapons you could no longer obtain which is frankly stupid I didn’t even bother doing due to how poor Stalingrad like yeah that smg was free but the Russian Thompson wasn’t and so several tanks like the STZ and ect
I just grind to lv 9 and fucked off
Which for Germany got me
M93 Mannlincher (I bought 47 of), G41, Grb, MG-13, and MP-28
And Soviets
Svt, Winchester, breda mod 30(I bought 14 of) , PTRS, PPD-34
Will the ferdinant also get the same reload time as in WT? or was the nerfed ROF deliberate?
I literally got to the maximum level within 20 matches. The exp net was insane. You still had the option to get the gold order STZ and can get it in the crates now. I remember there was also a way around the Soviet Thompsons if you transferred them from Tunisia but they were quite high level in Tunisia.
Well maybe we get event for all factions:
M42 Contraereo | War Thunder Wiki
All this vehicles have close performance so there is options for such event hope they come with squads.
Yea ur right, u got me there
