And that sucks, because I’d like to have that weapon, but in cases like this, or the early backer weapons, it’s better for the devs to keep their word with it not coming back instead of releasing it again. It’s better to have their word be at least semi reliable than to break it for a weapon
Take out the Smoke and put more HE or HEAT the smoke shells are useless for that long reload
This. I am not asking for anything controversial. I am asking for parity, equality and fairness in a video game we both play
No that is not accurate. Imagine a coffee shop that, for a limited time, sold a special chocolate chip muffin. Customers who happened to visit during that period could buy it and continue enjoying it forever. Later, the shop stopped selling it and only offered blueberry muffins. When new customers ask if they can buy the chocolate chip muffin too, the shop says, “No, but you can have a blueberry muffin instead.”
The point is that some customers were given the opportunity to buy the chocolate chip muffin while others were excluded solely because they arrived later.
A limited time offer is exactly that - an offer! The underlying product is still able for consumption / purchasing but at a higher price.
If you buy a jumper on offer, the jumper is still on sale at the shop for a price, albeit, higher.
This is all i am asking for - I want the oppurtunity to purchase the exact same things as u
British friends, I think the weapons development team for Enlisted must be playing a dice game, randomly determining the loot distribution coefficients. The open-top tank destroyer should be classified as Tier 3, not Tier 4, because they forgot that besides ground infantry, there are also aircraft in the air, and their attack range should be included. Because a single low-altitude strafing shot is enough to turn an open-top tank destroyer into scrap metal.
2 Likes
No, we all need chocolate chip cookies, because as long as Enlisted exists, there’s no reason it won’t continue selling them; it’s just a matter of time.
Japanese friend, you should ask this question on the anniversary of the Pacific War, not on the anniversary of the Normandy landings.
Dude just accept the fact that it isn’t going to come back . I’ve already accepted that the kickstarter weapons aren’t returning and they are way more unique and rare.
1 Like
Currently, none of those can penetrate a KV or T34 from the sides; the AT is nerfed or the tank is heavily buffed. Even firing at the tank from rooftops isn’t effective with those ATs.
The fact that the developers decided to release those weapons much earlier and now they haven’t, could it be that they didn’t have much hope that the game would continue? Because the MP41(r), for example, is relatively rare among other weapons.
I know its difficult for our fast eastern friends - but you really need to learn English eventually, your translator will always be confusing to people.
You just translated Nashorn with Rhinoceros, however only German speakers will understand what you are saying, since Nashorn is the German word for Rhinoceros.
Oh, I see. That’s too bad about my translation tool.
My apologies.
Wrong.
It wasn’t offered “as a reward”. It was available for everyone back then but devs decided to just… remove them. At the time ppl thought it was because it was too similar to soviet TT one.
They also just removed
Mannlichers rifles (just why?)
Breda lmg for Soviets
Thompson for Soviets
The captured ppsh mentioned.
Funny thing, they also just removed pz4G BUT ADDED IT AGAIN AFTERWARDS.
It was never “a reward”. Just removed. For no good reason.
3 Likes
I see them like LEGO tbh. Like how old set were plenty during their release and now no one sell it at all.
2 Likes
That’s in truth the best comparison I’ve seen about it 
1 Like
It was removed because trophy weapons shouldn’t be in tech trees. I know the Devs have done it before and after but they promised the mp717r wouldn’t become another example of it.
Also in the announcement although it was called a reward and was heavily advertised as being an exclusive item.
1 Like
M93 mannlichers?
Pz4G?
T24 STZ?
The reasons devs invented for the removals were arbitrary at best. The best reason I’ve seen to date is that devs love artificial scarcity.
And this:
But the act of removing something, could never truly be disguised as a “reward”.
The only reason these are not available is because the Devs promised that players who had played Stalingrad should be compensated for their troubles and that reason is good enough. Encouraging the Devs to break their promise and betray long time players is just petty considering NONE of these weapons are particularly game breaking.
By making something scarce it rewards those who were committed and stuck by the WORST campaign in Enlisted’s history.
Your were thoroughly fooled, then.
Removing something readily available for everyone, is not a reward, even if it’s painted as such.
- I didn’t get anything with the removal of availability to others. I already had bough the stuff. The only reward was the discounts the pack offered.
Seems devs gambit worked to a degree when they removed the access pack…
Well I did gain something, until the kp31 was added I had access to a high capacity smg for Germany, and now the kp31 has been added I have a exclusive weapon with slightly different stats that shows I stuck by the game.