Currently, the mounting configuration of the F7F is exactly the same as that of the AP1 level 2… This mounting capability is simply not up to par for a level 5.
In the game “War Thunder”, he has 1000 pounds of firepower.
Little Tim Rocket A high-speed HVAR rocket
He himself possesses multiple weapons.
However, in this game, only 2 500-pound weapons are equipped. Isn’t that a bit inappropriate? Since it is a level 5 bomber
That thing doesn’t deserve to be br 4. it has to be br 3.
Since its gonna 1 shoot everything it sees just like ISU, also it has trash armor just like ISU, and being open top, it doesn’t deserve to be br 4 which its actually nonstop br 5. This thing being br 4 is pure joke to german players, nothing else
So in order to balance it so that the weapons of level 5 and level 2 are exactly the same???
In fact, he has many options. He can choose to have 1,000 pounds of explosives along with a few HVAR rockets, or 1,000 pounds of explosives along with 2 small Tim rockets.
Rather than being exactly the same as the level 2 aircraft
This is a sign of being lazy.
At the same time, I’m quite certain that the F7F is much worse than a meteor.
Because even the flies in br 5 have weapons to deal with any tanks, let alone open tops. anyone who spawns in this vehicle will have “40 second fight” life span. IF they spawns in urban map then that time will be reduced to 20 second because they will get caught by any infantry while they waste their time to move to objective by trying to bypass obstacles.
It is fundamentally unfair that because you played the game before me, you get a piece of kit.
Do I get amything because I played the game later than you? No - it is almost as if locking content behind a wall decided on when you started playing is unfair
You mean like a reward for early adopters or like a loyalty reward? Just because you say it’s unfair doesn’t make it so.
The Devs promised those who slogged through the shit show that was Stalingrad would receive compensation in exclusive equipment, it sounds unfair to me that they should just betray players like me because new players are whining.
The KP31 is nearly identical to the mp717r so there is literally no reason to betray long time players.
So does “gun that you are already farmiliar with” mean that it will also have the 8.5 seconds reload or will it actually have a faster reload speed compared to the tiger 2 just like in WT? (even then tiger 2 has 7.5 seconds not 8.5 seconds reload so that is outdated aswell, the KV got the shadow buff from WT so why not?)
We are both players of enlisted. We are both equally entitled to all content - not some, not substantially, not marginally - all content. If we are treated differently based on when we started playing the game, that is unfair. If it was something cosmetic, or something which was not content, I could agree that it is not a substantial difference in gameplay. Even with the new weapon being added, you have access to something I do not
I’m sorry you had a bad experience with Stalingrad. However, your poor experience should have not affected my ability to gain access to certain weaponry
Why do you view it as a betrayal to have new players have access to weapons you have? What does exclusive equipment do for you as a player? Does it give you an advantage? If it does, then it is unfair? If it does not, what is your objection to letting all players have access to it
Not a new player - I was unable to obtain my pre-merge account because I migrated platform
There is a difference between whining e.g the body armour issue and a legitimate grievance