Weapons and vehicles of the "Operation Neptune" update

News
185

because of supply and demand. The limited supply of weapons on the market, and the high demand would result in high prices being set. No market controls. It’s the exact reason why free markets have regulations in place. Simply put - I do not trust the good will of other enlisted players to price weapons fairly. It is exploitative, for something you unlocked via a tech tree / research line, I have to be subject to market conditions for.

EDIT: then let’s assume that Gaijin sets the market rate. Then literally what is the difference between you selling the gun and getting the silver back, and me being able to purchase it from Gaijin from a TT.

EDIT 2: So adding a store to trade with would either would be exploitative or so restrictive that there is little to no point to adding this feature, where other things which would 100% be of benefit could be added

186

Has this become a vehicle game?
One f-ing gun per major update, but 3-4 vehicles? “Amazing”…
I mean, when the bots move the way they move in this game, can’t blame anybody for not wanting to shoot guns.
If you play this game as primarily a shooter, then there’s nothing to look for every single update…

3 Likes
187

It’s indeed interesting.

But what would be the result of a comparison between the Nash… and the ISU152?

Isu152 got lowered to 4. I’m curious about why it would be considered equal to the Nash, since the only reason the isu got lowered from br5, to br4, was the armour it have.

Whereas the Nash got… none… and is open top.

It’s just curiosity, I’m not asking for either to be changed, just wondering if they should.

3 Likes
188

most guns gets added via event or BP XD so yea thats why sometimes devs dont know what the actual hell add

189

it is what it is.

20 Likes
190

image
image1148×642 191 KB

at least the got decent AT for br 3 XD

14 Likes
191

lol 100mm frontal armor and a 122mm cannon at br3

1 Like
192

Cant believe still no planes for the plane faction xD

2 Likes
193

Well at least we can expect an event AA tank for Japan right? wink wink

1 Like
194

The 100m. Armor is just the lower Edge of the armor

195

Look

2 Likes
196

the 100mm is a very small part of its armor
front is 45mm overall

1 Like
197

Also on a completely random but semi related note. I came across mention of the Ho-Ri tank project and a mention on the cannons tested explicitly as and intended to be tank guns of 105mm.
The Ho-Ri isn’t just made up haha.

198

Suomi refunds!

4 Likes
199

Yes It didn’t got builded but is for balance the game or you want a Chi Ri against a pershing

200

The guns were built but the chassis wasn’t finalised.

201

I’m satisfied with it as it’s presented.

SU-122 (USSR, BR III) … BR III is Okey. I don’t really wants to meet it on BR I if you would move it on BR II

Nashorn (Germany, BR IV) BR IV its Okey. There its only one thing that mostly the BR IV is matched with BR V but it´s not your fall that no many players play BR IV. On BR III vs BRII its again nonsence…

Suomi KP/-31 (SJR) (Germany, BR V) Okey, why not.

Type 4 90mm AT (Japan, BR III) OK,

F7F-1 (USA, BR V) nice, more options but i still prefere thunderbolt

Result: Good work.

2 Likes
202

See it this way:

The Soviets have the ppsh41 parkerized. It’s the same situation really, and at least the engineer can also use the suomi in the premium.

1 Like
203

Alright,

once again a sparce update, but what we get is cool.

Nashorn and SU-122 will be intresting to see, hope there balanced and playable.
The plane planes idk

But FINALY an AT for Japs on BRIII, one that is not as dumb as the ofenrohr.
Soumi KP is cool, know many people will like that.

Overal good, just wish we got more infantry stuf

1 Like
204

Yeah but now people will feel less incline (i think that the word) to buy the current Suomi.

1 Like