The devs just need to copy and paste as they always do.
Enlisted devs in their infinite wisdom:
Adding Italian APC? ![]()
Storming Berlin with Chinese bolt actions and T-26? ![]()
Hmm—but the main point is that in this game, there are at most only two enemy tanks. Although the reload time is slow, it’s generally manageable. And compared to War Thunder, the rewards for reloading here are much higher. At BR2, there are at least anti-tank weapons like the Bazooka. It’s just too demanding to expect BR1 players to land headshots from 800 meters away with those small-caliber anti-tank rifles. Of course, this time I went back to BR2, and its rating was increased simply because some highly skilled players performed too well with it. Those on the receiving end were like Christians—beaten once and then again without fighting back. Over time, they took to the forums to vent their frustrations, and thus the holy Anton stepped in and nerfed it.
Right now, I have a serious question. Have you ever played as the Soviets? Have you ever used the IS-2 all the way to the 1944 version? Have you ever tried taking on a Tiger II with it? Do you have any idea what it feels like to aim with that pitiful Soviet sight magnification at 200 meters, watching the reticle bounce around like that?
That’s because the current international situation influences modern minds in a way that prevents them from fully immersing in the atmosphere of the World War II era. Nowadays, with the global landscape leaning toward Cold War dynamics, people project that mindset onto everything around them. Germany has reformed itself, while Japan’s modern media still often portrays its past wartime actions as unavoidable. As for Europe and the United States, they have no qualms about bullying the Soviet Union as if it were a silent, dead entity. Some even go so far as to suggest that the turning point of WWII was Pearl Harbor. If the current discourse on forums is also dominated by self-serving attitudes, then the Soviet Union inevitably becomes an easy target. The game may not have reached the Cold War era yet, but Cold War thinking is already alive and well in reality.

So we are talking about a machine gun that could only be used in proned or mounted is easily controllable.
What machingun in Enlisted is not easily controllable when proned or mounted? Especially when we just have:
ye, i just don’t understand why not save this for a chinese BR 1-3 or 1-4 faction. Also the chinese and soviets didn’t have any connections except for the soviet aid for china during the sino-japanese war. Also this doesnt make much sense, because the main user of this was REPUBLIC OF CHINA not the Chinese communists and therefore this shouldn’t be for the soviets
@MajorMcDonalds @Euthymia07-live
Is that a 30round magazin? And will that one have more damage then Type 2A and Type 2 SMG?
If it get 30 rounds but same ROF, then it doesn’t make sense to put in on BR V!
IMO it’s also not needed to give it more ROF then both other SMG’s above. Give it same ROF but maybe higher damage
??? (letting out a loud sound of confusion) What is this thing that looks like the American Stinger machine gun? Is it Italian? It looks so similar! Well, after all, they’re both aircraft machine guns — besides, there’s already the example of the German MG 15 aircraft machine gun on the tech tree. If this gun is released as event content or added to the tech tree, Italian machine guns will be really interesting.
But why can’t I leave a comment on your post when I go there?
It’s an Italian machine gun.
This restriction is absolutely ridiculous for a machine gun. Unlike anti-tank rifles, it doesn’t have such powerful recoil that it could literally knock a person dead. The photo has already given the answer — it could totally be fired from the hip with both hands, just like traditional machine guns such as the Gatling. Hope this gets implemented when the update goes live.
Yes its Italian, and yes it looks similar because it was based on the M1919 MG and similarly to the Stinger, was converted for infantry use in assaults.
9.4 or 9.6 damage. Something like that. They posted stats already
The ‘Japanese assault rifle,’ does it really exist or is it fictional?
nice nice
i have alredy 500 games with ussr
would be funny to say but since im a very slow player i dont have the IS-2 (1944) yet but i dont see problem when it comes to tanks against the germans since is like facing the KV-1 on br 2 (a lil bit harder to kill but you can get it if you are not dumb enough to enter to its vision line)
I also understand that the IS-2 is trash but as i mentioned it doesnt determinate the victory at all since infantery is what wins after all, i can guarantee that even if soviets get T-54 they would still losse dispite having better tank since their players are the real problem overall
The game don’t call everything by their native tongue but the Hangyang type 88 looks exactly like that rifle they called it the type 88 to shortened the full name (and technically doesn’t have a official one)
Wiki page talking more about this rifle
@Euthymia07-live
Can we have at least 1 new Japanese plane for BR II for the Fighter Sqad I that have only the prop plane:

Ki-61-I Otsu | War Thunder Wiki
It wont be so hard to implement so we save a bit BR II Japan. Lately all the equipment is focused on BR V and a lot of people don’t like playing BR V or maybe reduce the BR on the Otsu Kai to BR III so we can have 2 fighters there.
And also the new US Ground Attacker Squad can it have access to more vehicle’s since now its only the new one.
Breda-SAFAT machine guns mainly used on aircraft but also widely used on the ground by both the REI and the RSI in the 7.7 and 12.7 versions
7.7




12.7




some CVs also received SAFAT 12.7


there are many Italian LMG that would be nice to see such as
TERNI LMG

scotti isotta fraschini

FIAT 14 EXPERIMENTAL LIGHTENED

SISTAR


and as a BONUS there’s also a machine gun silencer
Interesting…





