if you do 200+ why you are complaining you want to do 400+?
at this point irts not the problem of the gun, you are the problem that kill too much/waste too much ammo
if you do 200+ why you are complaining you want to do 400+?
at this point irts not the problem of the gun, you are the problem that kill too much/waste too much ammo
For some reason people with fg on my team can’t even make 100. So the problem is with the weapon, not with me.
yeah. problem is not those players:D it must be weapon… oh germamy really suufers
the problem is the people not the weapon you can have the pre nerf mg34 waste all the ammo and get 5 kills.
(true story)
And no, the dreaded extra store won’t double the number of kills. Plus you get 16 more rounds for your Garand, you can do 10 more kills per life, don’t you mind? Everybody gets the same.
Your words. I played a match where a man made 20 kills with fg, when I made 200. Seems to me it shouldn’t be that much of a difference if the weapon is so OP and literally plays for me.
yes but this is your problem not the problem of the community find a solution for yourself, not everyone get the same number of kills as you and dont deplet their ammo that fast.
The man created the topic with the same opinion, so I am not the only one. What is the problem if everyone gets exactly the same amount of ammunition. It is nonsense that you are against it. Nothing will change in terms of balance. Only normal players will be able to get away from the crates and finally storm the points while the whole team is shooting near the crates.
Well, or it will finally make sense to take a backpack or more grenades instead of extra magazines, because I have no choice, otherwise there is too little ammo.
I’m not asking for more ammo just for fg, when I played with gewehr I was short on ammo too, I don’t think 32 on Garand is enough.
About AVS and SVT I will not even mention, there it is just as obvious.
people like you would absolutely conquest the field bc you have the best rifle and a ton of ammunition, and in terms of rifle the allied dosent have something that can compare to the fg.
and the small ammount of ammunition is made purposely but the developers if you waste too much ammo/kill too much go refill, if not i can see this game become full of rambo withh 100+ round even on the m2carabine storming everything.
AKA rush meta
Will you offer a solution to the competitiveness of the backpack and grenade pouches? I don’t like that I have to take ammo pouches for every soldier.
And yes, in a game where victory is achieved by capturing points, players have to attack. I want to take a squad of flamethrowers so I can push the amateurs to sit in the bush for the entire game with fire.
there is not a solution, you need to sacrifice something you’re as i say are not rambo, you cant have 80 round 2/3 exploisves mines and in the mean time destroy every one.
pick one of the play stile.
Don’t equip every soldier with Fg42 then.
I run with Kar98k (and MG34 to be complitelly honest) and I manage to be top 3, 5 in worse matches.
Okay, but don’t you use ammo pouches on all fighters with rifles?
I think so, as do absolutely most. You have to make the backpack and grenades look better to have a choice. How to do this without increasing the number of rounds of all rifles - I do not know.
The 25 rounds at kar are even worse. Bolt action rifles should have at least 40 rounds too. Getting in the top 5 is not a reason to be proud, usually the efficiency of players in 3-5 places is 4-6 times lower than mine.
Why are you purposely playing worse than you could?
It’s supposed to be a trade off. On some I carry extra ammo … on others I carry extra grenades … and on some extra health …
I don’t like it, but I think it’s fair considering the FG42 is a specialized rifle for para and is available to a wider group of soldiers than it’s counterparts.
They could, of course, bring in some parity in the other factions and also match ammo, like the BAR. But I am not sure that would match historically.
To be honest I think the FG availability doesn’t really match historically either. I think it was quite a bit more rare than it is portrayed in this game.
AVS also a rare rifle (about 50,000 pieces), and the jumbo was not in Normandy. Stop spamming this.
I don’t use back pack at the moment bc Im levelling the squads that I left behind.
But In general I don’t use backpacks bc i don’t feel I need them, and I prefer use the bronze order for leveling and unlocking my main weapons.
In my opinion, almost everyone takes more ammo and that’s it. The exception is soldiers with SMG.
I agree.
Because:
a) I play for fun. So I stick meta into my ass and do whatever I like to have fun. That sounds worse than I intended
b) I’m a noob so better weapon will result in maybe 5 kills more. Not enough to sacrifice fun.
So you are great player and want to get good gun buffed? Sry but no, I want to live for more than 10s.