Just come a few ideas on the locations of mew map.
Battle of Warsaw, at 1944, BR 3-5; OR at 1939, BR 1-3
Battle of Tannenberg, BR 1-3 and BR 3-5
Battle of Crimean, BR 1-3
What do you think?
Just come a few ideas on the locations of mew map.
Battle of Warsaw, at 1944, BR 3-5; OR at 1939, BR 1-3
Battle of Tannenberg, BR 1-3 and BR 3-5
Battle of Crimean, BR 1-3
What do you think?
bruh battle of Poland 1939 would never be possible because Poland wouldn’t have anything to fight with. The poles were so under equipped they collapsed pretty quickly
They should really add some Italian theaters of wars like monte cassino I was hoping they would of done some Netherland theaters of wars too like operation market garden such a miss opportunity. But your suggestions are good except 1939 Warsaw
it’s pathetic how after all this time there are so few maps for Stalingrad
Now, that’s not true, while most of our equipment was shit, units were properly stocked with matériel. And a poor country surviving a month being team-tagged by two then great powers is quite an achievement (compared to the French, who had an extra 6 months to get ready and still got caught with pants down against almost a peer opponent).
The actual reason for not adding Poland 1939 is that, unless we go completely off the rails with any attempt at HA and allow them to be part of the Allies, we would need a new faction (we can’t support 4 big ones we now have with player numbers), that has comparatively few equipment options (look Japan without fantasy guns) that cap-out at BR III. Also, Poland is not very popular in FPS types of games, so player numbers would be low (even if we had numbers for it) and most games would be stomps (my giant patriotism wouldn’t suffice to allow me to carry it by myself /jk).
Sure, some Netherland maps and Italian maps are definitely welcomed
Agree
Oh, they did; it’s just that it was straight garbage compared to the enemy they were facing.
Since I saw a lot of Eastern Front maps, I thought I would list the Eastern Front maps I would like to see.
I think DF can make none of these because they are lack of tech, skill, personal and most importantly attention to players. Or else it is impossible to explain why they can’t make the unreasonable part of the game with just changing some number
More campaigns = more headaches
Having to equip customization on German squads for 6 different campaigns is a real pain in the rear. I would prefer new maps for already existing campaigns, especially Stalingrad.
Western front and Pacific both need urban maps while eastern front needs more open terrain (non urban) maps.
Once customization is fixed I would like to see new campaigns that offer more interesting scenarios that are not just Germany vs USSR or US.
like
Italian campaign (Germany and Italy vs US, British Empire, Polish AIW, Free France and others like Brazilian volunteers)
Siege of Budapest (Germany, Italy, Hungary vs USSR, Romania)
Winter War and continuation war (Finland, Germany, volunteers from Scandinavia, Italy, Hungary and others vs USSR)
Invasion of Manchuria (Japan and puppets vs USSR and Mongolia)

Where are the campaigns?
In soldier customization.
Also we still don’t have camo changing on vehicles so Africa camo A13 can show up in snowy Bulge.
I wonder, have they not fixed that because of incompetence, or is it because of greed?
Probably a bit of both.
DF has a limited number of employees and has to divert them at making new content and tweaking already existing content as well as bug fixes. In a way they are too gready to stop spamming out premiums, but too incompetent to fix problems in reasonable time.
Not that I dont want more maps…
But I really hope they spend the a patch cycle or 2, finishing stuff instead of creating more.
How many exactly? Like 20-15 or something?
Also, if they are looking to have more people on the team, they have a boatload of potential employees entering the market.
Take-Two Interactive is cutting 5% of its staff and canceling some games | Windows Central