Why is there such a big difference between the recoil of a semi-automatic rifle and that of an automatic rifle? This caused soooo many problems. These issues include:
1 ; Although a considerable number of players do not think so, assault rifles like stg44 are far from reaching their historical strength. Almost all top players will choose to use 9-man infantry teams in BR5.
2 ; It is ridiculous and untrue that a semi-automatic rifle has more recoil than an automatic rifle when fired, rather than the same or less.
3 ; If fully automatic, full-power rifles are so powerful, how did the development team plan to balance the assault rifles that were fielded by troops in the late WWII era and even after the Cold War? Would it make sense for people to carry .422s and AVTs into the jungles of Vietnam?
So why not simply give fully automatic rifles the same recoil characteristics as semi-automatics?
4 ; Military education documentaries before or during the early Cold War generally required soldiers to switch their rifles to full-automatic mode at a distance of about 20 meters, using them as submachine guns. Any distance beyond this was considered a waste of bullets, as the recoil of a full-power rifle was actually very difficult to control. Improving this will help make the game more realistic.
5; If the production team only wants to make World War II content and does not want to make too many improvements, simply making the recoil of the BR4 semi-automatic rifle the same level as the fully automatic rifle can also improve a lot, at least solving some of the above problems.
Hope enlisted gets better.