So one guy making fun of you is one whole group? Lol get a load of this retard.
Keep proving my point that it’s bias
Keep coping bitch.
Keep crying
This has already wasted enough of my time.
Hope you have a good evening
The counters to your bullshit strawman about how the history people are ‘‘spoiled’’ or toxic in general which you’ve conveniently ignored. And the nuance about the Federov and the Tiger.
Magnificent deformed midgets?
That was some other asshole lmao. Pay attention.
Tell me how it’s biased, I really haven’t sided with anyone on this, also you keep showing one person who insulted you, the anti history people are more than one and have attacked as such.
1 Like
Do you like the campaign changes or not
Not really, the history fans just get upset when someone says the game was never historically accurate
wait need to make popcorn, before you 2 go at it 
I don’t believe in the new matchmaker, which is way more of a serious issue than historical accuracy. I’m on my own side.
Also the games page had a banner that said “historical accuracy” if you weren’t green you would know of it
6 Likes
If you’ve played this game from the start since CBT, you know that is false, fucker.
The realism banner, but it obviously implies historical accuracy. Of course, there’s going to be some nuances like gold order weaponry and plausibility. We just don’t want things that are completely anachronistic or things that didn’t even exist yet.
1 Like
There actually was a banner that said “historical accuracy” but they removed it recently
3 Likes
What do you think is the problem?
“Historical accuracy” as in accurate weapons, vehicles, uniforms, battlefields.
Been playing the game since early 2022
Ah, if there was I wouldn’t remember. Do you have an image I can see? Not that you’ll convince Blegh cuz he’s a fucking idiot, but perhaps others might be swayed.
You do realize, saying fuck every other sentence doesn’t make you cool or any more valid than the rest of us, just shows your lack of vocabulary
2 Likes
Yes
cringe