- Soviet engineers, building german AA
- German MG42 in soviet bunker in 41
even just one dude carrying hundreds of kg to build AAA in like 10 seconds
realism baby
Really, going that low now?
Im sorry that Keofox promised us national AA by christmas and still dont have them and that the devs are dumb and lazy.
Id like to point out that this historical accuracy thing is problematic due to fact that everyone seems to have different view on it.
One wants full historical accuracy with squads set up with BA’s 1smg and perhaps 1mg.
Next wants what we currently have - time travellers
Next wants what we currently have - time travellers BUT “arguably could have been there equipments”
Next is more intrested of uniforms that appear to have wrong sport-lace shoelaces.
Etc, while the “Historically accurated” subject should be simple as was it there or not. It seems in this forums theres as many variations of historical accuracy as there are supporters of the idea.
Which is why I find it rather impossible to satisfy them all, which most likely is the reason they are given the custom games as theyr playground where every each “historically accurated” view can be made.
As someone who’s mainly bean watching the comments from the side, there’s two type of people.
“People asking for some kind of historical accuracy” - they ask for different things whether simple or not involving historical accuracy and are giving suggestions etc.
“Anti-historical accuracy people” - they are simply anti-the people who want historical accuracy. Instead of just giving proper counter arguments they usually insult and name call the people who want historical accuracy. Calling them complainers yet I can go back and find plenty of times these people complained about something.
The first group has refrained from insults and demeaning comments. The anti group is just simply anti, I don’t think they really care, they’re just simply against the other group for no apparent reason I can see so far.
This is so accurate, some of them, not all of them, seems so angry and bitter just because you don’t want to relinquish all accuracy, like they want to.
The first group showed lack of reading skill or simply understand what people are saying because most of them dont even read the news they simply moved the finger on the keybord, most of them whas ghost user who posted only for rant or new “fresh” user who dont even say hello before start typing nonsense
I read all the conversation this morning a nice reading in meantime im gonna drink my milk, and the mostly argoument of the first group are always the same
“IS2 in Moscow”
“Now is only meta”
“I dont understand wy you are putting japanese in normandy”
“Were is my costumization”
“Nooooo i dont want it”
Now some of them give suggestion mostly was a letter for santa, but they tried
Second group instead after giving some decent answer based on what james,keo or simply what is written on news site, start shitpost when the already mentioned lack of reading people come
And this is because as @Conscript_Joe posted whe need a pool because a civic conversation here is impossibile because it end with a wall talking at another wall
Funny…
The German mg was captured
Oh I know right? Like how before they fixed the MGs where the Soviets built MG42s? It’s almost like these are things that can be corrected.
It’s so fucking annoying trying to discuss this topic rationally with them. It all just boils down to “Well there’s still Custom Games” or “You’re in the minority, people don’t want this” which would completely bypass them reading my actual point and suggestion. They just dissent because they want to. There is nothing wrong with our posts and for people who say they don’t care, they really DO care, like a lot to be continuing this long with this.
I’ve only been able to communicate with a few of them and present some ideas if this went through, but no one wants to hear about how to preserve it with the system in the main game.
That has been confirmed.
That is still reasonable to expect from players at the end game.
They aren’t doing that this update, no guarantee they won’t do it in the future, should they follow through with abandoning accuracy.
Considering they are merging campaigns, which have different squads, of which might also be merged, those squads could have outfits on them that cost money. This is a legitimate claim, just like the campaign slots that cost extra money. A lot of people don’t make enough money a year to enjoy seeing it get burned away by a change like this.
Pretty much the same response from people who don’t want historical accuracy. I’ve seen more of this than actual suggestions though. Everything has been parroted from Keo’s posts instead of actually thinking about it.
And you are fantastic selective reader wo intentionally avoid the rest of the post, maybe is to hard admit all people wo want give their opinion have shit argoument backed only by retarded user wo dont even read the news? Or understood what people was talking before post?
and there are no side is not “me vs you” “im in the majority” or other shit, there are only people wo are confused by the half-hassed devblog wo dont explain a shit
Yes because is easy talk with someone at third time you explain him that is better wait the Q&A instead of start clogg the forum with fake news, him simply call you dev dog because you are not ready for a stupid “historical accurate crusade”
Ffs you are no different if you think your immaginary side is better
This is so pathetic, it doesn’t even deserve a witty comment.
Enjoy your 2 likes in 7 hours. Good boy.
Pfft, are you really writing on forum for likes?
It’s really hard to read through all the spelling mistakes. That’s probably why you get misinterpreted a lot, if you do actually mean well.
People have read the news, they’re asking for clarification and are against some of the things they announced. Have you actually read the news? If you had, you’d know literally only one of the examples you provided of “historically accurate” players complaining about was something clarified as not happening within this update (Japanese in Normandy). Everything else is confirmed or could be speculated to be true based off how they described the system.
People keep calling the historical accurate crowd in the minority, using that as an argument against any of our points. So yes, people are making it a Majority vs. Minority issue rather than focusing on the topic at hand, being the changes they presented and the suggestions elsewise.
How long are we supposed to wait? Are you telling me that you’ll actually debate the points presented instead of saying “You’re in the minority” or “There are still more devblogs” after the Q&A? Nothing is “fake news” either. We aren’t media outlets, just merely people disliking proposed changes alongside speculating the good and the bad outcomes of said change as we have the ability to think past one update.
At least im not going out of my head for a videogame i think i can accept trade a good english for a functional brain
7 days dev already give us the date 3rd march something im saying a lot in this day
And again
Withaut information on the update is stupid as fuck divide ourself on blue and red what is the point, someone know what dev want say?
As far i seyed neither helper know it because they keep saying the same thing like a pre-registred message
I don’t think those two are mutually exclusive, lmao. I’m assuming you didn’t start learning because of Enlisted, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t improve if that’s what you want to speak.
Alright, so we are actually going to have productive conversations after the Q&A. That doesn’t mean we can’t make aware that there are issues with what they did release to be the case, which many people already have. It’s only become a point of contention because people who are against historical accuracy have made it a crusade to try to shut down anyone who wants it.
That’s what you want to see
I’ve seen more “historical accuracy” players insulting everyone
While we (anti-hist how ever you want to call us) done nothing but post long explanations why historical accuracy just won’t work anymore
You can find us here, on Reddit or on YouTube and there are numerous explanations from players and YouTubers deeply diving into why it just can’t be achieved with enlisted
Next thing, nobody is here “anti”. We just post what we think is best for the game, we have right to express our opinions, you and us
I honestly don’t care if we have or don’t have historical accuracy as long as I don’t see t-72 tank and M16 assault rifle in Moscow.
What we will get is historically accurate maps with historically accurate nations fighting with hist acc uniforms. There are no red dots and tactical scopes which means we are using historically accurate equipment from 1941-1945
One member of your group completely destroyed my last post with very disgusting comments so you are far from right. There will always be toxic players, our view on the game doesn’t make a difference, there will be toxicity on both sides. I had to ask the moderator to shut down my own topic because this guy just couldn’t shut up
Obliviusly not, but i prefere keep write a bad english if it mean, become the avarage forum user wo start a war on speculation
You know im a lot proud of how my brain work maybe people dont like i can be insopportabile for them but at least in 25y of life it always helped me a lot so im fine with myself even if a write like a horse
Yes because you cant have productive conversation before know an argoument currently no one know nothing your conversation are based on speculation wo are incorrect if developers dont confirm them
Both immaginary side are in full honeymoon with the crusade idea, and Both side are wrong because both side have people wo actually are attacking even personally wo dont think it like them
And there is nothing more to add im not interest in figth with you this immaginary war, but only make people understand that there is nothing to fight because we are on the same boat almost all of us invested in the game and no one want see their money burn