This is so pathetic, it doesn’t even deserve a witty comment.
Enjoy your 2 likes in 7 hours. Good boy.
2 Likes
Pfft, are you really writing on forum for likes?
It’s really hard to read through all the spelling mistakes. That’s probably why you get misinterpreted a lot, if you do actually mean well.
People have read the news, they’re asking for clarification and are against some of the things they announced. Have you actually read the news? If you had, you’d know literally only one of the examples you provided of “historically accurate” players complaining about was something clarified as not happening within this update (Japanese in Normandy). Everything else is confirmed or could be speculated to be true based off how they described the system.
People keep calling the historical accurate crowd in the minority, using that as an argument against any of our points. So yes, people are making it a Majority vs. Minority issue rather than focusing on the topic at hand, being the changes they presented and the suggestions elsewise.
How long are we supposed to wait? Are you telling me that you’ll actually debate the points presented instead of saying “You’re in the minority” or “There are still more devblogs” after the Q&A? Nothing is “fake news” either. We aren’t media outlets, just merely people disliking proposed changes alongside speculating the good and the bad outcomes of said change as we have the ability to think past one update.
1 Like
At least im not going out of my head for a videogame i think i can accept trade a good english for a functional brain
7 days dev already give us the date 3rd march something im saying a lot in this day
And again
Withaut information on the update is stupid as fuck divide ourself on blue and red what is the point, someone know what dev want say?
As far i seyed neither helper know it because they keep saying the same thing like a pre-registred message
I don’t think those two are mutually exclusive, lmao. I’m assuming you didn’t start learning because of Enlisted, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t improve if that’s what you want to speak.
Alright, so we are actually going to have productive conversations after the Q&A. That doesn’t mean we can’t make aware that there are issues with what they did release to be the case, which many people already have. It’s only become a point of contention because people who are against historical accuracy have made it a crusade to try to shut down anyone who wants it.
That’s what you want to see
I’ve seen more “historical accuracy” players insulting everyone
While we (anti-hist how ever you want to call us) done nothing but post long explanations why historical accuracy just won’t work anymore
You can find us here, on Reddit or on YouTube and there are numerous explanations from players and YouTubers deeply diving into why it just can’t be achieved with enlisted
Next thing, nobody is here “anti”. We just post what we think is best for the game, we have right to express our opinions, you and us
I honestly don’t care if we have or don’t have historical accuracy as long as I don’t see t-72 tank and M16 assault rifle in Moscow.
What we will get is historically accurate maps with historically accurate nations fighting with hist acc uniforms. There are no red dots and tactical scopes which means we are using historically accurate equipment from 1941-1945
One member of your group completely destroyed my last post with very disgusting comments so you are far from right. There will always be toxic players, our view on the game doesn’t make a difference, there will be toxicity on both sides. I had to ask the moderator to shut down my own topic because this guy just couldn’t shut up
2 Likes
Obliviusly not, but i prefere keep write a bad english if it mean, become the avarage forum user wo start a war on speculation
You know im a lot proud of how my brain work maybe people dont like i can be insopportabile for them but at least in 25y of life it always helped me a lot so im fine with myself even if a write like a horse
Yes because you cant have productive conversation before know an argoument currently no one know nothing your conversation are based on speculation wo are incorrect if developers dont confirm them
Both immaginary side are in full honeymoon with the crusade idea, and Both side are wrong because both side have people wo actually are attacking even personally wo dont think it like them
And there is nothing more to add im not interest in figth with you this immaginary war, but only make people understand that there is nothing to fight because we are on the same boat almost all of us invested in the game and no one want see their money burn
You didnt really open the topic in a diplomatic manner so I don’t know what exactly you were expecting.
3 Likes
Russian Puts seems to be an outlier, while I have seen more of the “anti” people go on the offensive in the comments. The “anti” people started it with the attacks while the historical accuracy people just simply stated what they desired. If they lash out I don’t blame em especially since they didn’t start this shit.
3 Likes
You used the word “crusade” first, I was merely repeating it. However, there clearly are two sides if there are identifiable users that take up certain positions and instead of wavering on a certain matter, they try to discredit either their opinion or the user/position as a whole, the approach depending on the person.
But sure, I won’t argue with you on this matter until the Q&A is released, but I will still get my opinions out on the matter based on what is represented and what I can assume to occur, unless it is then clarified.
We all have money invested rn, yes. But a certain group they advertised to, using key wordings on their website, in ads, etc. is currently being spat upon and kicked out because they decide to backtrack after receiving possibly thousands of dollars, if not tens to hundreds of thousands, from these people.
1 Like
I really don’t care who started the insults, I myself didn’t insult anyone after we got the news.
I did say say community is spoiled in my post and that’s the only thing that can be seen as “offensive”
But all that was said becouse of a simple reason, after we finally see developers are communicating with us and are trying to find a way to please everyone, some people just started calling Devs brain-dead again
It’s not important who insulted who, we all want to see this game succeed and that’s what unites us. 
Abusive and toxic players will always be here and hell we can’t do anything about it
But there’s no need to start a war between 2 parts of the community because a couple of morons decided to insult people on forum and Reddit
Doesnt make sense to call community spoiled, that they should cry somewhere else, attackibg strawmen and saying “where have you been on topic” etc. and now just saying its about a bunch of bad people.
Choice of words and attacking strawmem makes no sense in this context.
I would like to remember that we are talking about the same guys who cant deliver working MG bipods for two years now (and can somehow make working SMG and ATR bipods).
Dunno why people question their competence.
Keofox is lying all the time to the point where no one should trust him. He refuses to share data with us, he always refers to data to justify their decisions to the point where it became meme, he keeps making promises they dont fullfill and when he said lets talk about the new system with the Q&A, he basically pissed off after three hours and so far didnt reply to any further question.
Thats not how actual communication works.
4 Likes
Well there will be no moscow once campaigns are merged.
And from all the campaigns id say moscow maps are least resembling any of the actual battlefields of that era.
As example when new player joins the game and gets “old moscow” map most likely he cant tell anything from the map itself where its supposed to be located or at what timeline.
Well tbh, I dont even care if it goes that far. As long as the matchmake eventually becomes functional and I get decent games with similar skill / hour / equipment / level, how ever the final matchmaker groups people im more than willing to sacrifice historical accuracy for it.
Ofc such “sacrifice” is easy for me as I never considered this game to have any historical accuracy excluding weapons names.
And I think its by far better for the game as well.
Id say the endgame gear & massive grind is by far bigger drawback to newplayers than certain “unhistorical” scenarios.
Well, lets be honest here, theres just as many opinions how “historical accuracy” should be implemented or preserved as theres people talking about it.
Not to mention that this guy called me an idiot and somehow expected me to be civil lmao.
I really don’t care who started the insults, I myself didn’t insult anyone after we got the news.
That’s a straight up lie lmao. Not to mention the passive aggressive jabs you made about people who want to keep this game historically accurate at least to some extent.
Cause this comment totally isn’t biased at all
1 Like
You went too far there
They will fix them before final launch. They promised it and are already showing their efforts. This is the first time ever that we see them communicating and cooperating with the community. They even started hiring experienced players to work with them
Many playerbase complains about grind, unbalanced weapons and splitting the playerbase are going to be fixed as well.
Keofox is a well respected CC by the community. Majority of players respect him. Knowing game forums he’s one of few CCs who actually care about their job
This is his job, he can’t just spoil information he’s not allowed to just to prove a point to an angry player.
As for being pissed off, no you got it wrong. Keofox normally answers comments during 1 hour after posting. It’s always been like that since alpha, that’s why I don’t ask him questions if 1 hour has passed
Moscow maps are my favourite. It’s always been the most or one of the most played campaigns in the game. You get a mix of close range mid range and long range combat. It’s very noob friendly as well (not in the recent times but that’s being fixed with the new update)
On other things you stated I do agree on
Bro
You think I can take you seriously after what you wrote yesterday
One can insult you back and make valid arguments. The fact you haven’t addressed my argument just proves you have no valid counter.
Are going to rage mode again?
Hulk joined the internet