Two Histories

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

We have all beat the british when trying to invade on the beaches. This is not historically accurate and im ok with that…but, what would happen next? Germany would invade the UK and eventually the USA. Make this happen Gaijin. If you are prepared to beat the allies on the beaches then dont complain about historical accuracy when the ‘Invasion of the UK’ update happens. Just play.

Also, this could obviously be done with Japan, Italy, and any other wwii campaigns.

So you’re saying Axis should auto loose all games?

No, i said…‘we have all beat the british (USA) when trying to invade the beaches’. So what about an invasion of the UK?

The following idea is probably not viable because the player-base it too small and other player-preference related problems so i left it out, but since you are confused: If you defend the beaches as Germany successfully then it would be a progression type game where in the next battle you will automatically be Germany invading the UK. (so how is that auto *lose? It is the exact OPPOSITE. Not good englishes no?)

The solution to the problem of winning games as the Axis is auto loosing. Thus you avoid ahistorical scenarios. It‘s quite simple

away get a tardis then pal. What you on about ahistorical. The whole post is saying NON-historical. I, and I assumed YOU both win as Axis against allies. So if ‘we’ are ok with that then we are ok with an invasion of UK update. Obviously not, you desert when axis or dont fire shots. Very strange pal.

You’re jumping to conclusions far enough away to be on mars. Just because a game allows both sides to win, otherwise Axis would need to auto loose every single game as I already stated twice, does not mean we mist be okay with the game’s development resources getting wasted on nonsensical US invasions when Italy, China and most of the Pacific Theatre aren’t in the game.

1 Like

You’re so sociable)

Those arenas do not allow development (oh the irony) of the game as they keep it stuck in 1945. Well done, groot.

Gaijin allow both sides to win. Well done them. If both sides couldnt win, does it mean its not a game?

Auto lose wouldnt be part of the game pal. It would skip to the next battle where both sides won. Well done, again pal. Maybe you should be a developer yourself. Its idiots like you that say no to every idea that will advance the game both for gaijin and the community and talk about THEIR (if the game can be developed into something more popular then they WILL use their OWN resources, not just ours) resources while not investing any themselves. Ive spent 1k pounds in the 8 months ive been playing and i want others to play as the player base is relatively (to other fps games) small. Adding more effing wwii maps will keep the current player base happy but will NOT encourage players to put down that garbage battlefield (your favourite game pal) and play enlisted. A two histories update WILL attract NEW players and allow the game to move forward in time in the futre development of the game. If you are prepared, as you are, to beat the allies on the beaches, then you are prepared to invade the UK. Its new, not just for the players, but for the game. It is not the same old stuff. Everything they can scrape from the WWII archives. Let the game develop, paaaaal.

I say: ’ what does Mars have to do with anything?’

You say: ‘It’s JUST a figure of speech’

I say: ‘But it is intended to appear intelligent to other people (not you and me) in an attempt to win an argument.’

You deny this, even though it is the truth.

P.S. you don’t win arguments by saying someone is on Mars because they are ‘jumping’ to conclusions. 1. it isnt clever even though you believe it is
2. it isn’t funny as you intend (even though you claim you arent trying to be funny).

Also, why do people like you flag every post? That is NOT how you conduct an argument. Exploiting the forums slack rules to flag and remove posts that you dont want others to see. Stop wasting my time (groot?). Dont read my posts.

Another one came, followed by another and another
And the words are empty
The developers have their own way :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

small scale paranoia. Go away.

If there was no plan, there would be no game)

1 Like

it’s *losing, not ‘loosing’. Can you stop typing ‘loosing’ please, thanks.

Noone said that the Axis winning is a problem. AGAIN, it is the EXACT OPPOSITE. Axis winning opens up alternative history. Gaijin should utilise this, but things like you keep saying ‘nooooooo’

They win the local battle
But not the war
Although I would look at the server statistics.

1 Like

please don’t bore me with ‘english no being me first lanuages is it though’ or anything like that.

Here’s a thing for you; if a film is good then the majority or all enjoy it. It is entertaing, thus not boring. So, if you are boring one, you are boring all. Stop boring me ‘groot’

I have, that’s how i know the player base is comparatively smaller.

More top input, pal.

Dig in the ground in enlisted? I do that. Because it is helpful to the team when it is helpful to the team (e.g. second point at the japanese airfield. I also burn trees because the cover is good for the attacker, and lay all the bags, wire, and hogs). If I had ADHD like you then i wouldnt do this for the team, i would kill and die on a continuous boring loop like you do.

to hell with the grass

*psychic