if we can transfer weapon between campaigns, what do you think about transferring soldiers?
would be nice, now that troops are harder to obtain
and you could reuse soldiers that you dont need anymore
Definitely a great idea for us and I fully agree however…I feel like they want you to buy premium and the battle pass too so leaving soldiers locked to the campaign forces more people to pay.
er…
i’m not a huge fan of timetraveling ( or the other way around like it somewhat already happens with enlisted currently.
so it’s a no from me.
Why would the Devs do this? Explain how this doesn’t decrease revenue.
that then for new players nothing changes they always have to buy them back from the beginning at each campaign
i’m not really here to argue or change my opinion about it.
( as bobby partially explained it better )
nah none of this I just reiterated that for the new people nothing changes, that’s all
i know, but that rises up more discussion
ok as you say I don’t even want to start a discussion from scratch
I think that for example , russians who fought in moscow could fight in Berlin, I agree I am not proposing some time travelling
And how weapon transfer increases revenue?
I said (how it doesn’t decrease revenue”……quite different than “increasing revenue”.
Soldiers now require silver orders, which are very difficult for F2P players to stack up.
Weapons can still be purchased randomly with bronze orders, which are not nearly as
difficult to acquire. Not the same
To make it so it’s not a revenue problem you could make it decently expensive, like 30-40 bronze orders or even silver orders