Normandy allies
Pacific allies
Moscow axis
Iam really sick and tired of their bs complaints and obvious lack of skills of their playerbase.
I swear, even if df give them nuclear heads or die glocke, they will still complain nonstop
I finish axis moscow whit % higher than soviet
I am not talking about specific players.
You are completely right. There’s nothing more to say.
I admit I’m currently flabbergasted by Pacific Allies’ ability to let themselves be rolled, stomped, spat, and nonetheless occasionally bamboozled by Japanese despite the latter having arguably the worse arsenal in game.
Still, I find the lack of Germany Suffers™ in the OP disturbing.
He said top 3, don’t worry I’m sure they’re here as well
Nobody likes mains complaining vs the factions they refuse to play.
There’s no real top dog/underdog faction, even if some got more or less better or worse equipment…
…
There’s only egregious trends about which faction to play, and which to avoid.
Hopefully it will be solved by something they hinted with the roadmap, that should pit ppl more equally vs other ppl…
We’ll see
Why don’t you let me blow up the second stronghold
Normandy Axis complains more than their allied counterpart, Typically Allies have one champion troll at any given time, while the constant complaining about M8 rockets from almost every Axis players has not ceased since they buffed the M8s, and don’t even get started on the P-47.
All in all pacific allies honestly have it better than the axis there and Moscow is pretty balanced overall and probably the most balanced out of the campaigns from what I can tell. Normandy I can’t really speak much on since I’ve avoided it for awhile now in both faction sides due to a spam of a certain something.
Normandy allies = I lost 2 matches = unbalanced campaign, ju188 OP because I went in the strongest spot where multiple gunners can see me
Pacific allies = Just flat out skill issued
Moscow Axis = Understandable actually, since Federov, T-34, and AVS
Playerbase sure, but gear? Definite no
Disregarding the WP grenades and flamethrowers as both factions have the same. The Pacific Axis have better assaulter weapons. Since the meta is constant rushing of the capture points it’s not surprising the Japanese win more.
The A6M2 Raisen have the best turn rate in the entire game, Japan dominate the air. Allied dominate the ground before. The addition of the Chi-Ha kai having 47 mm APHE and HE will give Japan better chance of winning ground vehicle combat.
The USA have better snipers, AT launcher, MG, but those does not belong to rushing class. They either perform best at distance or make the player very slow when equipped.
I dunno. I’m currently lvl 22 with Japanese and so far all SMGs (including CBT ones), although generally comfortable to use, feel like they lack the sheer DPS power, especially when compared to Allied .45s.
I’m not considering the air power since I feel that in Pacific the CAS plays a much smaller role in the general outcome of battles than in other campaigns.
Compare type hei/otsu vs garand. That’s what actually matters, not smgs. Just another weak excuse, nothing else.
The M1A1 Thompson is unlocked at level 25, comparing the the equivalent unlock at the same level the Type 2A
The M1A1 Thompsom have deal 1.2 extra damage at 10 m and 1.4 extra damage at 100 m it perform worst than the Type 2A in many other categories.
Comparing the best campaign SMG for each factions that being the M1A1 and the SIG Model 1920:
The M1A1 is only better at damage and reload while it perform worst in 8 other categories.
Visually the sight of the M1A1 is more obstructive than the the sight of the SIG 1920. Furthermore the SIG 1920 have a bayonet giving players the ability to charge and kill enemy with 1 melee without the melee perk.
Weak excuse for what?
I have average mechanical skill, but I have 6d play time on Pacific Axis with 77.07% win rate. I think I have an idea of what the meta is for that campaign.
I have provided screenshots to the Pacific weapon spreadsheet shared by a helper on the forum, feel free to look at them.
Axis Moscow has been pretty lit recently imo. Of course, that’s timezone dependent. If you’re stubborn about using a particular faction, like me, just go to a different campaign if you’re repeatedly getting rinsed
I won’t reject numbers. Admittedly though, you’re bringing as examples the top Japanese SMGs, which not so many players have.
A huge portion of Japanese assaulters is more likely to still wield low-mid level guns. Those have large magazines but relatively low ROF.
Once I get to unlock at least the Type 2a, I may change my mind.
My pacific axis wr is more than 80%. But WR doesn’t mean anything lol. Pretty weird flex ngl.