Tired of not knowing Vehicle performance as non-WT player

Mess Room
1

Adding WT WIKI’s data to my wiki.

image
image1070×889 158 KB

IL-2 is a flying tank…

image
Also 4E is not that bad. Even better than 4F1 in some aspect

image
image1054×740 162 KB

T-28’s horrible AT ability

Also even WT Wiki have no info of Pe3/SB2M-105’s armor
image

Why WT WIKI has so many detailed information of Vehicle’s speed/armor/shell penetration, but Enlisted’s description just vaguely says:
image

As a player that rarely play WT, I missed lots of vehicle information.

Though tons of vehicles now (just of Moscow)
image

Next plan: adding penetration data for game’s for those wrong info weapons to my wiki.
image
Grb has at least 60mm penetration.
While Panzerfaust 60 has 200+ penetration.
Just because they work different ways than AT rifle. Game’s description is wrong.

6 Likes
2

Yeah, I hope they add some more detailed information to items.

1 Like
3

It’s 90mm from datamining

4

would really appreciate more detailed ingame information, right now using external data sheets to get some more info about that. :frowning:

2 Likes
5

Cast humongous armor

6

impossible then i would be slapping tanks left and right in normandy with tbe sturmpistole because they use basically the same warhead

7

They are not identical according to data mining

8

guess they have different cal then

9

Now you know how it felt to be a tanker in WWII, you shot wherever you could and tried to get to the sides or rear, not snipe a tiny spot.

10

This is identical to the ingame statcard in War Thunder.