That’s not an excuse that’s a fact that Tiger 2 is too much OP. Only this tank alone plays the major role to win a match and I demand a new BR 5 USSR researchable tank with a 100mm gun. I think T-44-100 will be perfect and also, two IS-2 with the same slow reloading 122mm gun in BR 5 makes no sense. By the way, German, Japan they have powerful BR 5 firearms too! USSR firearms are not game breaking not even slightly overpowered.
No, you’d better not suggest adding Cold War tanks, or I’ll send you back to War Thunder. This is Enlisted, not War Thunder. You need to distinguish between World War II and the Cold War. 
2 Likes
Furthermore, in “Enlisted” mode, armored vehicles have no impact on the course of the battle. Their role is solely to provide fire support. Moreover, claims that in Tier 5 matchups, with comparable Soviet and German weaponry, a single Tiger II tank could defeat an Allied unit are utter nonsense. You’re simply trying to port the Tier 3 system to Tier 5; you’re not trying to add new tanks, but rather to completely destroy the game’s balance.
“armored vehicles have no impact on the course of the battle“ Oh really? when I have said that Tiger 2 (H) alone playing the major role in BR 5 I literally mean it. It got decent armor, decent fire power and it survives longer than it’s rival tank. Many times I have seen Tiger 2 camping behind and getting 80 to 120+ kills before getting destroyed! Tiger 2 lacks nothing.
I was a War Thunder player and now I’m playing Enlisted. No, I don’t wanna go back to WT. Enlisted is more enjoyable than WT. In WT the distance between spawn point and the objective area is too long and getting one shot is not fun. In Enlisted I can spawn with different squad and can play the whole battle time.
If you like it Enlisted, please don’t judge it by War Thunder standards. Enlisted tanks are merely fire support weapons; if the infantry neither attacks nor attacks, the game is lost. So, you feel the Tiger II tank is too strong? That’s because you’re using equipment below Tier 5 in Tier 5 matchmaking. A problem that infantry anti-tank weapons and bombers can solve, yet you’re saying you need new Cold War tanks, and you even plan to port the Tier defend 3 matchmaking system to Tier 5. Isn’t that breaking the game balance?
Not anymore
After meteor F nerf and the Do335 join the game, US have lost their dominant on air vehicle, there’s no any US high speed aircarft that can carry 500 kg bomb
Infantry can destroy any tank if they are able to flank. Even for the infantry it is harder to flank a well positioned tiger 2. Cause it has faster reload speed and better gun depression. IS 2 has long reload time and it carries like 12 HE shell. You can’t spam HE with this tank. You can’t push with IS 2. You can’t make a single mistake with it. Tank vs tank face to face battle the situation is totally different. With tank you can’t move freely. With the tank you usually have to fight head to head. Tiger 2 can outmatch any USSR tank with it’s faster reload, its frontal armor and its 88mm gun that can easily go through IS 2 armor.
I’m not just asking about balancing the BR 5 USSR vs German tank but I also want a new USSR tank with faster reloading gun which can at least punch through the frontal turret armor of Tiger 2 and also can spam HE round. USSR has two IS 2 tank with the same 122mm gun. It is just extra grinding. You have said that I’m not adding anything new but I’m literally asking for a new tank with different gun. I absolutely want something new for the refreshment.
I also want to add that you have said “armored vehicles have no impact on the course of the battle“ if it’s true then why are you being afraid or unhappy about this post? I’m just asking for a new USSR researchable tank 
Complete nonsense.
The game is simply unbalanced.
1 Like
reason?
KV1 is too good at BR3, what advantage does germany have at BR3? Better SMGs? Better rifles? Better planes?
BR3 is completely in favour to Soviets, while BR5 is quite balanced with the entire exception of IS2 vs Tiger II, and body armor, but body armor is simpy a terrible mechanic that needs to be removed anyways.
This isnt asymmetrical balance at all.
Also Soviet rocket spam is ridiculously unfair, the devs nerfed Germanies first real rocket plane by moving it from BR3 to BR4, while Soviets have IL2 at BR2. The argument for this apparently was that German rockets have more pen - which makes no difference, rockets are OP against infantry and Soviet tanks have more roof and rear armor than German tanks.
2 Likes
Overpowered against what exactly?
Any infantry squad can easily destroy it via AT gunner. And the tank doesn’t even have fast reload speed to be annoying.
It’s only overpowered against clueless people who have no idea how to deal with its armor (those people simply shouldn’t be playing high-BR tanks)
High fire rate howitzer tanks on BR2 are way more potent on their BR than King Tiger is on its BR. Armor is definitely not everything, it will protect you only from newbies and clueless players.
2 Likes
Then they should balance BR 3 too 
I’m okay if they nerf the KV 1 or, they add something new to the axis to match the KV 1. It’s a game so I will welcome any fair doctrine.
You are talking about skill? Okay, then you shouldn’t be worried about adding a new BR 5 tank in the USSR researchable faction. With your skill you can deal with the new USSR tank too. You can ignore.
I am not. I wanted T-44-100 or IS-100 (/object 248) for quite some time.
King Tiger is pretty mediocre, with exception of being very good in tank vs tank fights. But overall is extremely overrated thanks to its armor.
Nowadays all factions have decent AT launchers. And you can easily use them to even snipe out grey zone campers.
Writing here “easy“ is easy but doing it in the battle is not so easy. Reality is different. Yes, I have destroyed many tiger 2 tanks but that was extra struggle. Panzerfaust has low velocity. I have to get closer to the tank and get behind of the tank. Even for panzerfaust Tiger 2 has very thick frontal armor so either I have to get its side or behind. If it’s sees me it will just splash HE round to the nearest wall and the splash can kill my my squad too. Also, it usually stays behind so first I have to sneak though the enemy infantry first. Each of my squads have one AT gunner so I have one chance to do the job. Before reaching towards Tiger 2 the tank already gets 60-80 kills. Comparing with other tanks Tiger 2 is really OP.
By the way, I was talking about tank vs tank.
I have never had a situation in which this would matter at all in any meaningful way.
King tigers are usually just sitting somewhere, rarely changing positions.
On the contrary, I’d say the Pfaust is absolutely great for sniping out campers in the grey zone. Thanks to its big trajectory drop, you can actually shoot at them from behind cover without the tank being able to see you at all. And since the tank is marked, you know exactly which direction to aim.
All you really need is to get some experience in judging the range and how to aim. But you’ll get the hang of it pretty quickly.
1 Like
Yes every tank including the Tiger 2’s the main enemy is the infantry. But, I was talking about tank vs tank. There are two IS-2 in the BR 5 USSR tree. Both of the tanks carry the same 122 mm slow reloading gun. It is just another grind nothing new. All I want is a new researchable USSR tank in BR 5 with much faster reloading gun and can hold more rounds so I can spam HE without worrying too much about running out of shell.
1 Like
Then I would support your suggestion. I just don’t agree that king tiger is overpowered, that’s simply overexaggeration from my perspective.
1 Like
To my experience, the Tiger 2 (H) is still overpowered. As a USSR player, I struggle to kill it, even though I can destroy tanks from other nations without any trouble.
If the USSR BR 5 lineup received a new tank with different gun options example: 100 mm, 122 mm, etc, it would keep newer players from getting bored. It would give us all a new reason to grind the game.