Thoughts about Monetization system of Stalingrad

Mess Room
21

I’d still rather have seen Stalingrad entirely locked behind a paywall. Would eliminate any accusation of pay-to-win in that campaign, and wouldn’t feel like a drug dealer giving you the first taste for free.

You are making yourself sad drug addict by your logic.

I can hardly understand why your kind of people feel so offended by the very existence of a price tag. F2P is often harshier than normal games, and one more F2P campaign can cause serious trouble. 3 different F2P campaign for Eastern Front? That’s absurd. They made the right choice.

Just confess that you want a freeware made by volunteers.

1 Like
22

“My kind of people.” Bud. Just, wow.

In the same statement you quoted, I stated my opinion that I think it would be better if Stalingrad was entirely pay to play, pay to access content. Don’t pay, don’t play in stalingrad. Less drama overall, no accusations of p2w.

Also, this kind of “you get the better shit by paying” monetization is designed to get people with poor impulse control to pay for a thing. Don’t take a metaphor a run away with it.

2 Likes