This suggestion will go unnoticed by devs but would greatly expand the lifespan of the game

Archive Suggestions - Archive
1

Limiting the game to just 4 factions stifles this games potential. To build a player base with a stronger sense of identity greatly ensures that each persons experience is unique and promotes exploration I therefore suggest this; A faction split. The following should be playable options.

US
Germans
Soviets
Japanese

Axis Forces (Italians the main entity of this faction Bulgarians, Romanians, Hungarians Estonians, finish volunteers, “free Arabs”, Cossacks ect)

Allied forces (British the main entity of this faction French, polish, Dutch, common wealth, partisan forces.

The allied factions would be limited to maps only where they historically apply.

Currently this game has departed from historical accuracy if they continue with this trend then why not make generic maps IE “Nordic ruins”, Dutch village, Mediterranean coast, Italian vineyard, German forest. Etc

Or you could go Chad mode and name those maps the battle of Denmark, marketgarden, Crete/Greece, Sicily/selerno, Hertigan forest ect…

In summery, One thing that makes war thunder and world of tanks great games is an impressive number of maps and faction options. Look to those games as examples on how to prolong a games lifespan

In the war thunder model the battles span generations of development. If enlisted ever did that I’d suggest they break it into chapters however that would fracture the player base so it’s best to focus on ww2 for now. The exception would be Korea. A Chinese campaign could easily be established in keeping with ww2 expanding upon Japanese gameplay and could then grow into higher teir actions with the US and allies. Not having the Chinese and extending enlisted into Korea is a missed opportunity all around. You can even make a BR 6 and 7 or even 8 to introduce DPRK forces that you could insure will not battle tier 5 Japanese thus keeping immersion.

I feel like devs never really read my posts so it’s a hopeless cause but there are ways to satisfy everyone’s needs and to build more ways for the devs to make money by splitting factions, creating new ones, adding more gameplay and expanding the game in general. Eventually BR 5 can only get so big. I do foresee the tech tree expanding someday. We will see where this takes us. With that build more factions for diversity allowing for multiple approaches of gameplay.

1 Like
2

When unlocking squad, they should let us pick the soldier nationality

3

Apparently that’s a big no no cause according to the CCP there was no China before the CCP or some crap like that, so that’d kill DF’s entire whale market

I’d kill to have Korean War though

2 Likes
4

World of tanks, for example, has pre-communist Chinese units in the earlier tech tree and later tech tree is communist.

5

I don’t know man. Last time the Chinese were suggested that’s what other people said. Games that have China pre CCP are bad or some crap like that. I don’t know. I don’t starve under a communist dictatorship

6

Lmao that implies that life under the soviets, imperial Japanese or the nazis wasn’t that bad? Good lord…the logic gives me cancer.

7

Do what?

8

Oh you ment the games themselves were bad?

9

Something about the CCP doesn’t like portrayal of the ROC and the other warring factions within China during the most recent Chinese Civil War, and it’d be hard and disingenuous to add the Chinese to Enlisted without having those other warring factions. Or some crap like that. I’m just trying to remember what others were saying. As I said, I don’t know I don’t understand the inner workings of communists

1 Like
10

My first wife was born in the mid sixties and grew up in the Soviet Union, so I used to hear stories of her life there. I have been to Russia twice, in 2003 and 2005.I spent a week in Moscow both times, and a week in her home city of Ufa, which was a 26 hour train ride east toward the Ural Mountains. I got a tour inside the Kremlin, and walked right outside their Capital. Being American, I doubt I could do that today. :rofl: This is me in 2003 I believe with far more hair then today in Red Square. :blush:
st basil moscow

1 Like
11

Dang you really are old. Lol. Good to see some of the older generations getting into modern games too

2 Likes
12

I turned 60 in May. :blush:

1 Like
13

My dad is 76 and games more than most of the people in this forum do.

He plays Elite Dangerous mostly, but recently finished RDR2 and Fallout 4.

2 Likes
14

I wish have time to play it, I have take it for free from the EGS I played it 10H max but it requires to time for be enjoyed something I don’t have

2 Likes
15

I retired at age 57 because of some handicaps, so I have had much more time to play the past few years then I did when I was having to work 9 or 10 hours a day. Part of my disability leaves my right eye vision cloudy, so it’s irritating when the enemy comes up on my right as I don’t see them as easily, but I’ve kind of got used to it now. I still play on occasion Sniper Elite, but don’t have Sniper Elite 5 as for some reason it will not work on my computer. Something about the Nvidia graphics card I believe, and I spent a lot of time playing the Call of Duty games years ago.