I find that nubs listen when my score is 5x theirs, critical moments of the game you will see me on chat saying
‘‘GO IN IN IN IN IN’’ and while on the beginning they don’t listen, once I clear the path for them, they do DIE in glory, advancing!
4 Likes
thats the problem “we” im playing only germany lvl 23 now and im on a win streak of like 17.
US players are just too bad/noob/bot
2 Likes
if point 4 is in the bunker then it’s incredibly easy to defend, though yes point 4 village might as well be considered lost unless you have a party with you
because they’ve got shinies in tunisia to get
1 Like
Yeah i started just leveling Tunisa as Axis and this was my first game with full stock squads
I must say it was fun, even though we lost, and i dont get why Axis player in tunisa cry, thier starting gear is good enough to get the job done in 90% cases, and grant I is overrated (he cant get to most places and is slow to react)
2 Likes
Hey don’t insult the bolt actions! They are very slow but quite reliable! They can absolutely murder anyone you set your sights on no matter what the situation is, unless there are more than 2 enemies rushing you.
I’m not disagreeing with you on the fact that most of the “balance” issues are more of a skill balance issue than anything, since “higher level” equipment won’t make bad players better and good players can absolutely decimate the enemy team even with bolt actions. However creating a skill based matchmaker is not only way harder than any other type of matchmaker, but it still would have similar results in a lot of cases since there’s no skill based matchmaking system around that’s accurate enough to put people who are always exactly at/around your skill level, because not only can you have matches where you perform way better than your average skill level, you can also have a bad day and have way worse results aswell. Plus with the game’s current playerbase we would have quite a looong waiting time I think.
Also, how would people who play with their friends in a squad be handled? That’s also really important. So overall there are many issues with skill based matchmaking. Even if they decided to work on one it would take AT LEAST a few months if not a year. But I still think if they did decide to add one, it’d have to be in it’s own “ranked” playlist so we can have the current “quick match” type of gamemodes aswell.
2 Likes
Anything they try to mitigate player skill will be better versus what we currently have 
Yeah man gotta lead by example.
Get that carry backpack on. I will sometimes try to win tough games as it can be an exciting challenge
When they see spawns available on the flank out of LOS they’re like ohhh. This is what we are suposed to do.
Then go into a p47 to soften ground defences with 10x HVARs and take out a tank and crash plane and lead the assault in on foot.
1 Like
Thank you for proving my point,
Good battle too, hope we end up on the same team one day and tear them ‘op side’ a new hole with bolt actions
1 Like
Dice roll on left click? 6 is a headshot 1 is a miss. Noone can complain about skill if the dice decides their “skill” 
Why you hate Allies so much? I have played today and won all games.
1 Like
I find Ver sur mer invasion most difficult atm. Capturing first and second points takes too muck respawn tickets so I and my team don’t always have rnough gas to capture last ones.
But it’s still winnable.
And D-day is pretty easy fir americans, I agree.
i was so annoying too, they must fix this as soon as possible !!!
Even if they couldn’t (arguable), the grind up to lvl 7 is reasonably short. From there, semiautos vs anything else is acceptable.
so you give to the new players, the orders for the weapons otherwise I don’t see how some lv7 with still springfield who don’t know the maps,tactics for counter, veichle weak spot ecc. can do anything
At level 7 you unlock Garands, and even just by basic game achievements (even though I highly recommend premium battlepass) you should have enough between silver and bronze weapon orders to upgrade most or all of your riflemen.
Unless you couldn’t help yourself and wasted them all on barely-above-starter weapons, instead of saving them for later when they would be more useful.
I’m not denying that late campaign weapons make life easier, I’m just stating that Garand vs FG42 and MG34, or G43 vs Thompson and BAR for what matters, it’s a reasonably fair fight. Been there, done that.
do you think new players know this? they spend them because the basic weapon is weak and use them for the new bolts and even the game force them to do this, then in the end they realize it but very much in the end.
As pedantic as it sounds, planning and resources management are abilities that should be learned for every possible application in life, aside of gaming.
If a player is grown up enough to know the basics, he’ll know better than spending all its game currency into upgrading every soldier from Springfield to Ross, or such.
If he’s not, well, better for him to learn the lesson the hard way in a harmless context like a videogame, rather than in a real world situation.
???
I guess you are left behind, today’s gamers don’t use their brains, they go on in the game like zombies and don’t inquire about the game itself, to think that most of them have such attitudes is ridiculous, and this is also true for real life application, who don’t even know how to put the goods in order on a shelf (i see this)
then they learned it away from me, without ruining the little time I have to play
practically the game is made in a way to entice you to spend the orders, look at the logistics all the weapons placed by level, screaming “I am stronger buy me” and new players fall for it
however it is I just want a working matchmaking, I want fair play as far as possible, it is a game I want to have fun not to get angry
practically the game is made in a way to entice you to spend the orders, look at the logistics all the weapons placed by level, screaming “I am stronger buy me” and new players fall for it
This is more the players fault though? Every time you unlock something you get a copy of that gun you can try in practice range or use it in battle to see if you want more of them. Like in Tunisia the M1 baretta is a gun you do want and should pull 3-4 copies of, but later the MP40 is just a sidegrade.
Between pulling for a gun you do want you always get some bolt actions unless you get extremely lucky. So it makes sense to wait with spending. Well at least in my opinion. 