Never played those games listed.
If the game was important, they would address all bugs, and not keep releasing patch after patch, that just breaks something else.
I play to grind cards and to have fun.
Sometimes I find funny places to hide, build machine gun nests or OP rally points. Trying to understand foes movements etc. etc. The list is longer but nonetheless: Never boring, each match is somekind unique. And if a certain campaign or factions gets boring, I change it.
If I am tired of getting kicked, when I play underdog factions: I play as a sniper or as a pilot.
All I want to say: I think the game has so many different possibilities to be played, that if you just enjoy the game for the games sake, you’ll be good.
1 Like
I hope to find more vehicles and their unique uses here, like the infantry version of War Thunder, and CRSED of World War II, other games still can’t do this. I want to enjoy some strategy and strategic choices, and win each unique and rich battle through communication and cooperation between players.
Some players claim this game is BF’s more WWII immersive FPS alternative; some claim his squad mode brings some kind of RTS element to the game; but it looks fake, I’ve been waiting and didn’t find these.
Maybe until one day, I won’t have the feeling that I don’t want to click to start the game, every time it’s a monotonously repeated battle without any change. I have been ENJOY THESE BATTLE for several years. He doesn’t have any variety and strategy.
These things may or may not exist, and may exist.
Please tell me how can I find him? Or should I leave now?
But overall I’d like to see a WWII game that’s this competitive. My future WW2 game doesn’t have to be Enlisted.
3 Likes
Oh I forgot, a game called Medal of Honor in 2008 also had a squad mode, and it told a battle story in the Pacific War, in the first scene, the player landed on the beach in a landing craft under a hail of bullets, in general Saying that I don’t find these immersive atmospheres here.
I originally thought that with gaijin’s rich technical and model resources, they could do this easily.
BUT NOT YET.
Actually, all the stuff we collected are valued far cheaper than what we spend. No one outside the game thinks those collectables worth the OG price.
1 Like
It’s just some kind of psychological trap. After most players reach a certain threshold, they just switch to another game quietly.
2 Likes
I’m already trying to 
Actually something else besides game.
1 Like
Undoubtedly, game ACU has steadily declined after the event, now only be at about 7k.
3 Likes
Personally I’d like to see events that have pre-made squads and different game mechanics than normal. Let it be a testing ground of sorts with extra rewards afterwards.
Like I’ve suggested multiple times:
- remove ability to deconstruct from non-engineer soldiers, UNLESS they use a toolkit consumable
- have some members of the premade squads (such as riflemen) with backpacks and a couple toolkits, while assaulters get grenade pouches, and MGs get ammo bags.
- Test to see how it would play out!
2 Likes
I’m already burned out with the game with this marathon of events since February. Even made worse with all the anxiety on the future of the game with the new progression system with the lack of trust and faith on the execution of it.
2 Likes
I am happy that we dont have event now. Im tired of sweating and using op things to reach event points all the time. I can use my mortar squads as i want again
2 Likes
What is your definition of events then? According my and many others’ definition, Victory Day and Normandy Paras are events.
I agree with this. I really enjoy the game, but I also have a life, with a job, and, you know, can’t play a game every day. I know, my priorities are totally off.
1 Like
yeah, df should focus on regular progression and improving the game instead of events
We brought that up, as I felt tired of this marathon as well.