Lol… do you ever get tired of using your logic to pick and choose when you get to invalidate suggestions?
By that logic literally no more new content should be added to the game as very few things (or atleast we already have) that appeared in all theatres for the respective factions.
Also by your logic the only weapons we should have are the M1 garand, MG 42, 1 thompson variant, mosin and a ppsh and absolutely NO tanks.
It’s ridiculous dude… it has to get old at some point.
huh tf are you talking about?
It’s bad enough that we already see Pz 38t and Puma in North Africa, but seeing RUSSIAN tanks there?
If you struggle to see the logic conflict there, I’m sorry for you.
Wait, I thought the B wqs the one with thebgerman gun. Now I’m all confused
Okay, i can use my captured PPS in tunisia… literally that renders your wild logic irrelevant.
And even then it’s already irrelevant because we have cross theatre weaponry… just because it’s a worse example doesn’t make it any worse because you dislike it all around.
I’m not surprised you respond in such a way when told how it is… someone eventually had to say something.
It’s borderline trolling “hahahahhaa i have a dead image of pre merge in my head so your suggestion no no”… i think i would know.
However i have disagreed with things with worse reasoning… but your consistent usage of this BS excuse is ridiculous… i deleted my last comment along this line last time you did it but i cannot help myself this time.
Did I say this was good? No.
Did I say one BS magically opens the gate for more BS? No.
My preference has always been consistent, and potentially seeing Russian tanks in North Africa would be insane as well to me – why do you act all SurprisedPikachu.jpg about it?
I’m more so surprised at how stuck in the past you are.
Regardless of what you say think should be done it’s standard to follow by example in which case them having captured pps DOES open the door to “bs” But really… everything to you is BS.
Like i said if we had it your way we’d be all infantry fighting with only the weapons i listed earlier.
Go make your own game instead of trying to prevent the people that play and enjoy ours to get new, fun stuff.
No matter what it is by your logic you should be against it… like i said then we’d have no new content.
You’re right though however… this is like pointing to a big politician and being like “he’s a piece of crap”… well everybody knows that.
If that’s BR3 then a T-34-85 is also BR3
It’s funny how I’ve been in this game since May 2020, I know what I like and what I dislike, I am consistent with my preferences, yet you arrive and tell me what to do? lol
This is a suggestion with ‘yes’ and ‘no’ options.
As a member of the community, I am free to vote ‘no’.
Then I respectfully explained my reasoning without attacking anyone personally.
And now here you are, telling me apparently I can’t do that? lol
With how inconsistent explosive packs are, making them take “skill” is only going to piss people off.
Not necessarily… i’m only asking if you ever get sick of it… i would never tell someone what to do with their opinion regardless of my thoughts.
I digress… you are free to use your irrational reasoning to invalidate every single suggestion… and i’m not doing some service to the community by making these comments either like you and i said it’s like pointing out the obvious.
If that’s your question, you could have asked it without all the extra blabber.
The answer is: No.
I guess all that extra blabber was to try and show how pointless that logic is which by virtue is trying to change your opinion so you make a valid point… fair enough.
very funny
Considering that this KV is equipped with additional frontal armor)
To hell with the gun, the armor))))
Tower 105mm in a circle)))
There’s a well-deserved br-4 here.
because we all understand why the KV-1 ZIS-5 flew to 4 br)
Overall, I like the idea of seeing captured vehicles and weapons used by other armies. It’s an historical reality, and it can also add more flavor to the game.
Before the campaigns were removed, I would have been 100% okay with this idea.
But now…for example, we’re going to end up with Russian tanks under German banners in Tunisia or Normandy… and it’s not what I want.
Actually we already see captured PPShs (which is fine for Normandy, but I highly doubt they were used in Tunisia) for ex.
To conclude, I think the developers should first allow us to have a campaign-based preset system (with certain weapons being allowed or not) for each campaigns, as was planned and discussed during the campaign merge a lot of times ago.
Then, captured véhicules/guns should be add as event/premium.
If this is a BR 3 tank, then the soviet one armed with ZIS-5 should be at BR 2.
Tiger 712
This seems to be the second request I’ve seen to add the captured German T34 to the game. This vehicle has all its parts from different tanks, and it also has the tracks added by the Germans. The additional armor and the turret show that it has completely transformed from an ordinary T34. However, considering that the Soviet Union didn’t have the 1942 model T34 yet, I think these two will only appear simultaneously when df remembers that the Soviet T34 doesn’t have the official version with the combined commander’s tower and gunner. Honestly, I quite like this vehicle. It’s really powerful. With the additional armor on the front added later, it’s even stronger than the T34E (STZ) with additional armor in Stalingrad.I think he will be a very good advanced team. And in this way, the Churchill, Sherman and KB2 that were captured (and even the smoke launcher model later on) can all be added to the game as advanced teams. The key point is that they are all very interesting.