no the AI can ignores stuff like that and shoots through it if we get a pacific camping I believe it should be less jungle aka Okinawa or the Battle of Manilla 1945
Problem there is balancing Japan late game. Can it be done? Yes. Can this company pull it off successfully? I doubt it
Japan is the only way to.
Actually, there’s enough players. Especially lots of console players.
But Tunis is so lacking attraction to others, causing serious lack of players.
Thing is, I dont want Stalingrad to be another Moscow. It has to have something at gameplay level to be new. Newer map design. Especially buildings.
Yes same. It would have to be incredibly unique to separate it from the other campaigns or else it would be another Tunisia
I think, possible city combat environment. With lots of historical buildings. Like RO2.
um it would be more easer than mid war stuff also they actually had a experimental semi automatic rifle and better tanks and Aircraft that would make it more balanced and interesting
If they wanted to attract new players they would’ve added a Pacific campaign which is what the current competition doesn’t have (HLL, post scription), but their line of thought is to advertise what we already have, a city setting
Guess engie is gonna be level 10+ again.
And how should they balance the Pacfic campaign?
The only ways i could see pacific being balanced would be either early war or mid-late war filled with rarely/never used prototypes
edit: seeing the direction of the current enlisted campaigns option B is probably more likely
Or no tanks.
Then our biggest issue would be SA rifles.
But then… why USA vs Japs again?
Make Japs vs Commonwealth or even better Sino-Japanese War.
3 Likes
In terma of endgame tanks i could see m4a1 vs chi ha kai being the most realistic and viable combo for a mid-late war campaign
It would be fair if if the japanese would have other advantages-like potentially better planes, maybe better smgs
Guess that will be obsolete when they deploy Jumbo.