I am in Asia as well. I have 500 ping regardless of server. The fire rate helps with bullet delay.
1 Like
Oh, okay. It’s my mistake in wording. Sorry. It’s not Thompson. It’s the Chinese special SMG. Um, did you not swallow bullets when using it? What about the reloading speed? From this data, it seems to be about the same as the PPT-27. The best advantage is in the rate of fire. There’s nothing else. I still care about the fact that it only has a five-person configuration. Even the gold coin machine gun team has four machine guns.
1 Like
This is why soviet players get worse and worse
8 Likes
When I was using the Sichuan SMG, I did not swallow bullets while using it at long range or close range. If you tap fire it at long range it is still very good.
Despite having a very high rate of fire, if you invest into full recoil perks there is 0 visual recoil at all. Horizontal or Vertical.
5 people with the gun is already generous in my opinion, when you consider legacy squads whos engineers or classes whom are not of the main focus lack the same gun as the main soldiers. Good example being the MG-30 squad.
I do hope that we can add 1 soldier to it though, for an extra engineer, radioman or etc. Then again, I am content with what we have been provided with.
Buck up little camper, so the Germans get a 0.3% advantage in damage, meanwhile you get a two to one advantage in rate of fire, AND…You can still get body armor and get that sweet additional 10% protection. 
3 Likes
How dare you come and mock me? How long has it been since the Soviet BR5 gave any good stuff? Why don’t you mention the player drain caused by everyone getting tired of BR3-1? Is it because you don’t have any points to explain why it’s getting worse and worse? Huh? Say something! Respond! In this increasingly pay-to-win game environment, isn’t a five-person SMG squad not weak? The machine gun team is also five plus one. What’s wrong? Did the Chinese spend your money? Why does the Chinese SMG have to lose one person? All three Chinese teams are five people. Are you taking kickbacks?
I see you say a good gun is weak without even looking at the stats
It is plenty of reason to laugh at you
4 Likes
Poothy gorrilion buffs to soviets and give Mig 15 to soviets in BRII when?
1 Like
The Soviet clothes were directly copied and a hat of the Expeditionary Force with a different color was added. They are so uncoordinated and ugly. Maybe I would give up this for the sake of beauty, or to put it another way, it’s impossible for the Chinese team to have been equipped with this in history - it’s so ugly.
Forest shadows? so like 2 majors? or silenced PPSH if you count that one which was even later.
Edit: it was 3 majors but still
Tsk, are you still defending Germany? I’m going to calculate the ttk now.
。。。。。。。 What do you think? Isn’t that thing just a Frankenstein’s monster? It was supposed to be a tech tree item but ended up in the hands of the Chinese. It’s extremely abnormal. From a historical perspective, I don’t like it. In terms of strength, this damage is no good. It’s a bit less than that of a regular PPS. It was supposed to be a more powerful bullet, but the damage is even lower. Isn’t that just not working?
Bulletproof vests are only useful in low-br. In high-br, you’ll die in two shots whether you have a bulletproof vest or not.
Well, I forgot to mention that he only has five people. It’s as if Chinese teams are supposed to have five members. This seems like a curse. I’d rather have an equal setup with a 4+1+1 configuration than trade a submachine gun for two semi-automatics. This is BR3, where the number of people is needed to fill the lines.
Your attitude is clearly biased compared to that of the Russian forum. What’s your opinion on the MG45? Anyway, if I’m going to buy it, I’ll wait until it’s half price. If you have the ability, take it off the shelf quickly and tell us that there are many players begging to buy it. If you can’t sell it, it’s your loss. Don’t complain about my post later. I’ll change the title to be more tactful. Players have their own judgment in their hearts.
English?
Oh oh! Can I interview you about your feelings after using this gun? How was it actually? How about in intense situations? Can it perform as well as the PPSh in general?
I forgot to mention that the sight of this gun is just a piece of junk, it’s like looking from a crouching angle.
1 Like
That was a mistake. I just pulled the wrong thing when editing the interview about whether the PPSh from the West could defeat the SMG with no network delay.
1 Like
I’m not against pinhole imaging, but many scopes in games don’t accurately represent the human eye. For instance, this one and the one in NAT, etc., have issues like being too small and having blurry edges.