The most important thing we should never see

Work is still in progress il grant that I dont have high expectations to what they will manage to make and that scenario with current info bout MM is plausible concern.
They might add levels to formula as well so no lvl 41 vs lvl 1 regardless of equipment ?
Who knows.

Well the meta most likely will remain unchanged. To put it this way I did prefer bolt in cod2 for example and could compete against smg’s etc due to OHK.
But since 90% of time my enemies are bots I just rather get rid of them fast as possible which is where the automatics excel.

And as this game kinda revolves around the fact you just need to murder countless of bots it pretty much forces you to choose the most effective tools for that.

AND as last edit, id point out the AI is quite horrible so getting rid of them asap is kinda way to go.

2 Likes

Joe with all the respect if i have play bad or make favoritism to new player i quit

As you said you can wreck newbie even with starter gun, so wy is bad? Is your skill better than them not your equipment how many meta player you defeated because even if they was spamming meta their ability to play stop to “press to start battle”

Idk, what you want prove here please use a more decent example because the one you used here is terribile

Ok, to be clear.

  • The REASON a mm is needed is: help newcomers NOT get slaughtered right away.

  • What REALLY slaugers newcomers, is NOT equipment. It’s the guy who knows the game, the map and how to use things.

  • therefore, a mm ONLY based on equipment… will not solve the REASON. Vets will still destroy newcomers, they just have to keep using bolties like me, or use starter smgs.

Conclusion: mm based on equipment tier will not work. It will not make newcomers complain less. Instead of saying “uuuh tiger camp!” They will say things like “uuuh hacks!” Meaning they will keep complaining.

A mm IS NEEDED, make no mistake, everyone agrees here. Just that what devs propose, WT like BR mm, won’t be effective in Enlisted.

1 Like

In this case no MM is good because each one penalize someone, so, better pick one and move on because i dont see the dev build from nothing a ultra hyper complexed MM algorithm for make everyone happy

Exactly, no mm truly is perfect.

But some are less worse than others.

What devs hinted, is a mm based of weapon tier. Meaning a guy using JUST ONE a stg44 and rest starter bolties, will fight only vs ppl using stg44 tier weapons.

So ppl can farm noobs if they equip lower tier, but they can, and will still spam smgs.

What I propose, is instead to take the TOTAL SUM of your entire equipment loadouts, and place you vs ppl with a similar total sum.

There would still be variety at the very least, so this mm would suck less. And one could not use 3 smgs squads vs newcomers with none, because smgs squads would be worth more points for this total sum ratio.

Edit: I think ppl call this “weight” mm.

Its skill issue not g2w. And skill based mm doesn’t work cause of smurfs.

It is skill issue, in it’s purest form. It’s because of those that such mm will come to be.

But those same ppl, will cry nonetheless even against equivalent equipment.

So we will just lose variety in match, for no gain whatsoever.

Personally I’d like to see some way of economy ballancing

BUT

  1. it uses some kind of match specyfic points
    So you have points in the match that you use to spawn and those points are COLPLETELY SEPARATE from the currency you use to buy guns etc.
    Make vehicles cost to spawn (no, I don't mean maintenance)

  2. in a separate gamemode so players can chose if they want to play with this
    Yet another historical accuracy topic

1 Like

Know what? At this point I think a point to spawn system would be more fun than br restricted matchs only costing variety.

I’m just afraid a bigger tank spawned first would ruin the life of those trying to spawn bit smaller vehicles as their points will be wasted in an instant.

Perhaps they should separate vehicles and equipment for their br thing…

You can always use cheap to spawn infantry AT weapons.
If the enemy team is competent, they won’t allow you to use it but it’s not fault of the economy.

Also spawning a vehicle would block the income of the points so loosing a big tank is a major blow.

Sure, it’s not perfect but imo it’s at least decent enough.

Well if you want my opinion i dont care about what MM they use in the end so my opinion is less than 0 on this matter but there is something i want precise, people wo want exploit the game for stomp they find a way in the end, there is no way for avoid this so is not true we need matchmaking we need some gamemaster wo punish those people

  • You see a guy spam 20 WP granade? Punished
  • Another one wo is clogging the veichle slot? Punished
  • Another one wo is using 3 assaulter squad and kamikaze aganaist the enemy? Punished

In brief we need discord moderator

Careful now. Look what kind of discord mod came here in forums… :stuck_out_tongue:

The kind we dont need but we get

1 Like

Another stupid ideas.

Keo confirmed that none of these would be implemented.

It’s even better than the repair fee) It is also necessary to introduce a fee for the treatment and maintenance of soldiers, a fee for fuel for tanks and aircraft. Well, and insurance, which frees you from all this. Insurance, of course, costs real money) The payment is made on a daily basis. Well, or you can save your money by buying insurance for three, six or twelve months.

ПыСы Нда, Liah_Kim, предложил еще худший, чем у улиток, вариант: из Хероев унд Хенералов.

To suggest system from HnG you need to play HnG

Когда-то играл. И именно эта повадка брать денежку за каждый чих меня отвадила от этой игры задолго до того, как оттуда стали по признаку национальности выпинывать.

We are on English section, my friend.
Anyway, fox said, that there will be no ammo/repair cost and kriegsmodell with mp3008 will be starter guns.

We all know perfectly well what the fox say. As well as the fact that the DF will try to squeeze more money out of the players in the most idiotic way. So, let’s wait for deeds, not words: what the fox says doesn’t mean that, in the end, we won’t all be yiffed.

1 Like