thanks for showing you have 0 actual knowledge of WW2 tanks.
Fair enough.
I looked up the shells and I stand corrected on the HE specifically.
I was unaware that they used a weaker HE shell on the 76mm gun.
Except this isnt real life. This is Dagor Engine’s armor penetration simulator at play here.
I do love your freeabu enthusiasm but it has no place in a game like this.
Meanwhile @_31420124242011 suggests adding the tiger and panther to balance the 76mm Sherman, and how is the Stuart gonna combat those?
Like I absolutely love how you guys try to zoom in and make me out for wehraboo idiot or something, but did you guys actually stop for even a second to think about this?
Yeah you can still shit into it through the turret or behind the drive wheel. At 500m with M61.
Stuart already sucks complete shit so I actually couldn’t give a shit about it
Canister would allow it to be a great threat against infantry, outperforming the HE on the Puma.
Depending on the terrain, the Stuart can still be on par in terms of mobility,
And neither have any armor so 
One second of aiming can be the difference between getting shot or not.
My point is that you want to implement a strictly better tank than the best tank for one nation. Which is quite frankly not a good idea regardless of what nation or campaign it is.
So just because you haven’t progressed to the big guns you’ll have to put in massive ammounts of effort to get a kill. Got it.
Memeing on MBTs is just that. Memeing. Planet of low tier tanks do it for giggles.
WHY CAN NOBODY JUST READ
…
Nah I’ve been shilling them for awhile, least to friends.
It was also the other way around since i want the shermans to balance out the Panther
I want my Berlin experience again 
Produce it then you dutch goober
That’s why they would load the shell after sighting the enemy through it.
Which is most likely never going to be added to Normandy.
Then we wait for Berlin, where those tanks are balanced.
I have produced documents on pretty much everything else, but this one was harder to find at the time already, let alone now, so sorry that I don’t want to spend multiple hours just to please you.
Pumas are janky, they’re hard to balance. They can ambush well but have to take their time to set up against a target or they can’t do much.
1 Like
Nah I know the T-34 sights were literally bottom of Coca Cola bottle tier
He’s probably seeing my tracers and a lot of them are revenge bombers (lol)
But I wouldn’t surprised if you were right either.
I have no doubt the detpacks would cripple/kill the KV either.
It would also be brought down if they reduced track health too so you’re more likely to blow them off with near misses. ALL tanks need that, just like Puma wheels should break in Normandy.
Some posts have been cleaned up and warnings have been issued.
Behavior shown here towards other users with whom you disagree with is simply unacceptable. We have rules here for communicating, and at all times they are to be followed if you wish to use these forums to communicate.
If you cannot limit yourself to discussing the topic and in the end resort to insulting those who you disagree with, then action will clearly be taken.
Keep this discussion civil please. Please take a moment to fully review the forum rules as well, as there are multiple rule violations in this thread alone. Please consider this a warning to all thread participants. Thank you
(@8383908 @_31420124242011 @5762269)
I wasn’t there to read the whole argument but can anyone of you tell my why is forum moderator saying someone broke multiple rules
Anyways, If players didn’t want something, they can show it through poll instead of being offensive and rude
Now I closed the poll and will be making a conclusion post today, please don’t summon forum moderators on that topic too
Already in game, lol
2 Likes
I had no idea Panzer 1 was already modelled in enlisted
Its all just port from war thunder
Panzer 1 is not from war thunder
Maybe devs really plan to introduce all those tanks
I would like to see thicc Panzer 1 in Enlisted
The second vehicle, the Ausf. F, was as different from the Ausf. C as it was from the Ausf. A and B.[27] Intended as an infantry support tank, the Panzer I Ausf. F had a maximum armour thickness of 80 millimeters (3.15 in) and weighed between 18 and 21 tonnes
From wikipedia
1 Like
Well according to what mr.schyrikami shared, all of tanks should be ready to introduced to us all…it’s just a matter of time when we can get our hands on those tanks
Yes, it did - the 76mm shell walls weer thicker to deal with the stress of higher velocity, so it carried less HE.
By the end of 44 they figured it carried ENOUGH tho’, and the AP performance was superior so 75’s pretty much disappeared from then on.
1 Like