You can at least pen the crusader.
If you can catch it
Remember, desert is mostly flat so Crusader will have a lot of terrain to run across the battlefield
Don’t get me wrong, I love the Matilda (but I’m more scared from Churchill mk.1)
Crusaders aren’t particularly fast, they’re just british fast.
Update:
I will be probably making a conclusion post tomorrow morning (just like I did with my MG poll)
So vote before I close the poll
Cheers
Sherman 76 (W) is also confirmed in the launcher’s wallpaper.
As for T-34 and KV-1, I would only add them in a later scenario of the eastern front. The only advantage the germans have over the russians right now is the Ju-87’s loadout and so far everything points to being able to choose payloads in the future.
that’s not confirming anything at all. It’s really easy to just borrow it for the cinematic screenshot, and does not indicate that the sights for it are being made.
I would somewhat agree with you on the KV-1 but I just think t-34 is too iconic to be left
Far from true
MP-41 is still the best SMG and unlike other SMG’s it can be used on long range and get more kills than bolt action rifles
Pz-2 and Pz-3E are better than BT-7 in main battle tank role
G33 is better than M1907
If we count the disappearing-bullets bug PPD-38 has, we could say MP-40 is more reliable than the PPD
The only real advantage soviets have are semi automatic snipers and shotgun (which is a very situational weapon)
The biggest reason why SU wins is just like @5762269 once said it: ‘‘With Normandy campaign, German mains are divided in two factions’’
They were pretty good for their time - being a late pre-war design
I feel like people wanting ALL these tanks to be added are just wanting this to be like WT but with infantry.
Honestly, I think the tanks we have so far are more than adequate.
The main fear I have is, with heavier tanks and the clunkiness of the current Engineer AT guns, these could steamroll capture points before suitable defences are built, just like well coordinated tanks can now, We’d desperately need some better Anti tank infantry or mounted weapons.
Obviously for Normandy, Bazookas and Panzerfausts are more than adequate, but in Moscow, the PzB and PTRD are already kinda weak (Like they historically always where) but sometimes can take multiple shots to kill.
As I tried to answer on the poll, we’d definitely need more open maps for any good counter tank combat.
Really, I just want the option of “don’t add any of these”
If anything, I’d rather see weaker support vehicles added, like the M3 scout car, Sdkfz 222, 251 and other half tracks/ armoured recon cars than the heavy armour.
Precisely. If people are already complaining about a T-60 getting 80+ kills per game, imagine a KV-1 with 30mm on its thinnest areas, firing 76mm HE every 8 seconds while shrugging off anything short of a 250kg bomb.
Good thing Jus can return every thirty seconds to rectify their miss))
Lol who?
All 3 of the competent stuka pilots you’ll see per 12 hours of playtime.
All these xbox randoms complaining in some thread about it.
I see shitloads of them while playing on the US server.
It’s to the point I consider swapping my tank out for my Yak
so are the panther and tiger in normandy but we arent asking for those.
now only has 20mm frontal armor and gets shit on by everything.
People in the discord have including me
Panther and Tiger vs 76 Shermans is kino
Not if you take into account there will be pumas and stuarts in the same match.