this is not about them, exactly why i didnt mention them, this is about end level assaulter weapon
so does german, if you isnt counting bren then breda isnt gonna get counted too but again this isnt about them
hey but at least it still has exact copy of PPSh the PPD it’s like getting mkb 42 instead of stg44 not to mention russian get an actual PPSh in other campaign while german doesnt get any Stg44 or mkb42 in anywhere
grease gun is also iconic, thompson is iconic, MP40 is iconic, stg44 is also iconic but at least thompson obtainable unlike stg44 🤷
Which one? The (W) would be an ideal gold ticket weapon for an Eastern Front campaign I think - only 200 made and tested there
The (H) had 8-12,000 apparently - so should be of limited availability IMO.
There isn’t one for the USA - historically there was no such thing as “balance” like games seem to make gamers want to achieve. Alternatively - the M-16!
For the USSR it’s a little different - they were also developing an intermediate cartridge and had made a few designs by the end of WW2 so you have the SKS which some reports say was tested at het front in 1945 - other says it was not.
You also get the RPD machinegun built before the end of WW2
you say MG34 because it was in service? so in this case US is better because US first MG is bren and bren was mass produced and widely used
if you dont like M1918A1 why dont make suggestion to switch it with regular M1918?
funny guy
What is M2 carbine to you?
yeah, it cannot be equiped with assaulter but you can simply replace your assaulter with Trooper and it works pretty much the same and if you dont like using trooper make suggestion post to switch M2 carbine weapon type
Devs revealed that we’d be getting the MKb.42 (H) in this blog update. We’re still missing a number of these weapons, which should’ve replaced the Tunisia placeholders a long time ago…
i wont consider that news to be relevant anymore, it was just a plan but the plan was changed without reinforming and already been released exactly why we 30 mag thompson and some of them are missing
It’s weird to me because they seem like weapons which could’ve been balanced if Darkflow put the effort in. Not really a fan of having Tunisia campaign weapons in Normandy when we don’t even have Canadian, Free French, or British squads. That’s just me though.
They’re probably trying to finish the bulk of the work required for Tunisia’s release. It’s understandable but there needs to be a little more communication.
like english speaking mediator that translating suggestion, bug report, and communicating with the people in the post then forwarding it to dev to be fixed or considered
You should ask @Keofox about it. Because german players have been asking for it for infinite times but they just keep holding out what’s already finished.
Just some few examples. On forum:
Maybe because… troops in Normandy actually had italian weapons ??? Obviously not as many as you would see in this game but they had. Italians smg had the same caliber as the MP40 therefore easy to get ammo. Germany took over Italy. Boom, free stock of weapons.
Until Rommel decided to bring strong units in Normandy, you had a lot of poor stationnary units equiped with “crap”. You even had OST troops with russian weapons.
Who’s whinning with this post ? Not adding a few more wont hurt anything
You see, I would want to agree with the statement of adding the MkB-42 to Moscow (even though it was a 1942 weapon, not 1941).
For the Battle of Berlin, of course, with one caveat. The Soviets will get the AS-44. The Germans get the impossible to get future MkB-42 in a 1941 campaign, while the Soviets get a 1944/1945 prototype Assault Rifle.
