AVT40 this bad attribute, my goodness.This may be the worst-balanced matchup in this update 
Itās not a 1 for 1 match - the Soviets have other advantages that offset this particular situation.
The whole game is supposed to be a series of asymmetric balances - the weapons or equipment that look to be equivalents are not actually exactly equal, often nowhere near equal.
But what one side loses in 1 weapon it gains somewhere else.
Sadly it has been done very badly.
However, in the Battle of Berlin, it was obvious that the Soviet aircraft was relatively weaker. Although the newly added IL-10 could carry 250kg bombs, it belonged to the same team as the IL 2M III, and the IL 2M III because of its carrying Rockets, so it is the best aircraft of the Soviet army. In addition, the real problem with the Soviet army is that it lacks a weapon that can effectively fight against the Germans at the middle distance. The FG42 performs much better than the AVS at the middle distance, and AVT estimates the same. As for the Soviet submachine gun, although it is very strong, but the submachine gun is a weapon used at close range. In the environment where many maps of Berlin are open and require mid-range shooting, the submachine gun is actually quite embarrassing, not to mention. Under the influence of network delays, the bullets of the Soviet high-rate submachine guns may disappear.By the way, I used to think that the Normandy American Army or the Moscow German Army is the worst infantry equipment in the game, but now the Normandy American Army has received the enhanced M2 carbine, and after I actually played the Moscow German Army, I felt that the two battles were balanced. Each has its own strengths. But Berlin is an overwhelmingly powerful FG42. It can even be said that the Germans in Berlin only need to carry FG42 infantry to deal with all situations.
But where?
LMG? Plane? After the nerf (fix) of turret of T-34, tank is not advantage either.
SMG?
SMG is a joke compared to MG42. Why use SMG when you get decent LMG?
Because you canāt give a LMG to every soldier - nor a SMG for that matter of course.
Calling SMGs a ājokeā because they are not LMGās makes you look like a fool - the Soviet SMGās are very good - arguably much more superior to the German SMGās than the German LMGās are to the Soviet LMGās.
And the P-4 in Berlin is a dead weight for the Axis!
Tbh most things allies got isnt even good or worth grinding.
But this isnt even worst comparison in update. Go check moscow.
Allied got scoped avs and axis scoped stgš
Those are sniper 3 squafs so people can just run with 3 stg squads and destroy opposing players who mainly use bolt actions.
DT is good?
Also I can equipped LMG to most of my present in match soldiers, Because I primarily use LMG squads
Also do you know SMG is a pain for 100ms PING players? Lots of bullets are missing even if I am at 0 Packet Loss! It takes PPSH 10 bullets to kill one.
I guess this is because it means the snipers can be sniper, AND assaulter, AND gunner all in the 1 soldier - vey versatile! Give the squad an engineer and thereās pretty much nothing else you ever need.
Wow. You complain smgs arenāt very good, but then admit the real reason: your internet or potato cpu. Seriously I have no troubles countering mg42 even with the BOX mag ppsh.
100ms PING 0 PL isnt poor at all! And are you kidding with my ZEN3 CPU?
This game has serious net coding issue. And I believe at least a quarter of players has poorer internet than me. What about the balance for them?
Also, if a MG42 can be killed by a box PPSH, that soldier mostly should be a BOT. I hardly get killed from my viewing angle by infantry excluding grenades if my MG42 has ammo.
There is people living outside eu and america you know?
literally just like comparison between german SMG vs PPSh/PPD ?
No heās right
Germains love the bitch and moan about the PPD/PPSh, but it is nothing compared to some dickhead with an MG-34.
SMGs donāt OHK entire squads in half a second
The amount of damage Iāve done just with a single MG-34 in my rifle team is insane. The ānerfā gutted moving fire with the soviet LMGs but made the MG even better in CQC in most engagements
Thatās quitter talk right there
Iāve seen plenty of people dominate with it provided they donāt position like an animal
Iāve felt the high RPM smgs have hitreg issues for awhile too
PPD should kill in 2-3 shots just looking at the damage alone, but you have to hit someone 5+ time to actually down/kill them
The sfx doesnāt help the feeling either
I know what you mean:
I sadly believe it isnāt due to hitreg, all shots do register well, I tested a theory in Moscow with box ppd. Bullets simply donāt deal as much damage with ppd ppsh line of smgs. Even though they have listed stats showing the same damage values as other regular smgs.
I can see the soldier flinch each times hit, and he can take 4-5 hits before going down (at close range). Should take 2 based on statsā¦
Secret balance adjustment from devs?
Thats really intrestingā¦ have to test it myselfā¦
