Wow… I don’t think I’ve ever seen a build score as high as this.
Kudos to that player!
13 Likes
God I wish I had teammates like that. I try to build when I can, but I feel like sometimes the map is hostile to rallies.
4 Likes
Aye, it seemed like most of the team knew what to do. Quite refreshing for BRII Allies!
It just goes to prove that kill count isn’t everything. Teamwork and tactics are key to this game.
2 Likes
Although, to be fair, I have good teammates that build most of the time. Its just the times they dont that I tend to lose hard
1 Like
What bro was doing:
5 Likes
He must have hired Bob the Builder. 
9 Likes
According to your theory, this main character is the hero.
His engineering score is 350% of the damage he deals to enemies. According to your concept, this player is extremely great. Rather than that, the engineering score was 173% of the kills he had achieved. Also, why do more players in your team engage in passive fighting and waste manpower and time, and then eventually quit?
Because they were not your opponents, only one player who was fighting passively withdrew from the game.
This can also be interpreted as the opposing team having some players deliberately causing failures in order to give your team an advantage and a chance for victory.
Moreover, this is not “Born To Build!” That player was forced to do all the work in order to achieve the victory he was expecting. Because from his perspective, most of the other players were doing nothing.
As for the 132-point engineering score, it’s not a very high number. I myself have achieved it over dozens of times. My personal maximum engineering score in a single match was 301 points (killing 100+). This was in a match with no use of the Christmas tree, ammunition box, or repair bugs.
The highest engineering score that I have encountered from other players in a single match of a match was over 1000+(with little kills), but I can’t remember the exact number.
1 Like
yeah, i got 97 yesterday after we lost the first 2 points in a few minutes, and then we won bc of my building
its also really satidfying seeing building assists racking up too
1 Like
I’ve had 184 building uses in the past.
Well, the game is based only on anti-aircraft guns)
What theory? The scoreboard shows that the team worked well together.
Clearly he wasn’t. Many of the team built rallies and resources.
Congratulations. However, I’ll refer you to the first line of my post… I don’t think I’ve ever seen a build score as high… This isn’t an e-peen measuring contest. Just a subjective observation. I’m not sure why you’re so moody about it. Relax and go have a nice hot cuppa tea. You’ll feel better, I promise.
2 Likes
I think u can achieve that impressive score by building wires around enemy rallies
I would suspect that you get such score board from your team mates resuppling their mortars or at launchers at your ammo crates constantly, definitely gets you good points.
Or he was the only to build rallies.
i have seen lots of people that had high engineer stuff built, but it was mostly useless and sometimes downright detrimental(e.g. blocking entrance from where our team comes in cap). high number usually indicates that he build lots of sandbags/barbed wires. btw trolling enemy rally points with barbed wire can be funny and get you same or higher score.
1 Like
Yes, in most cases, some players pretend to be experienced players just to gain more engineering points. Some even do this to avoid being blamed for building respawn points when the battle is about to fail.
Those players who actively establish respawn points can also obtain a large number of points by killing enemies.
Due to the changes in the battle situation, these players failed to establish/recover respawn points at the frontline and on the flanks in time. They are not all-round players or experienced players. They wasted a lot of time and even did not engage in much killing. Even though they were using the highest BR weapons in the battle, they repeatedly used planes and tanks, built a large number of useless buildings, or constructed buildings that hindered their teammates, and even they deliberately used vehicles to crush their teammates’ respawn points.
Their battle statistics have those small scores, but they do not represent their contribution to the victory.
For example, in the Great Patriotic War, the Soviet Union sacrificed a huge number of people. Some of them were not soldiers, but most of these civilians provided/ participated in the production of food, textiles, steel, industrial products and weapons, or fulfilled their responsibilities and obligations for social order. They are all worthy of respect and remembrance.
But was there also a group of such pests among this large number of sacrificed people? During the Nazi German occupation, how many pests who persecuted their fellow citizens were not accepted by the Germans, but were executed or sent to concentration camps? These pests should not be respected.
“Born to build”? ！
Everyone is equal!
No one is obligated to bear all the responsibilities and obligations.
Even experienced players, they are not required to contribute to all the positions within the team.
But often, players who are striving for victory are forced to work hard in all kinds of jobs. They merely want to achieve victory and the benefits it brings.
However, a large number of other players are more selfish. They do not strive for victory; instead, they enjoy the victory brought about by others. They only fulfill part of their responsibilities and obligations, and forcefully hand over the tasks they dislike or are not good at to “players who pursue victory”. They claim that the game is a virtual world, not a real one, and they do not need to follow the rules. They are absolutely free and can pursue any kind of happiness.
Even some extremely selfish players will mock those who pursue victory.
Then these selfish players began to revel in the victories and k/d ratios that the burdened players bestowed upon them.
However, upon a comprehensive comparison of all the data, it is quite obvious that the high k/d ratios and high winning rates boasted by these selfish players are extremely dubious. (This does not refer to the all-round experienced players. Rather, it refers to those who deliberately engage in camping, sniping, are good at fleeing, and refuse single-player matches unless they form a 4-player veteran player team.)
And they firmly refused to adopt something like “War Thunder”, because they were afraid that their personal data could be viewed by others.
We were defending, and there was a lot of sandbag structures in and around the points, and quite a lot of tactical barbed wire too. So I expect he was the one deploying it all. Some of it was really well designed and very useful when we were pushed on the point.
Nah, I was building them when I could, and definitely saw several going up at times too. The scoreboard reflects that. It was a decent team overall who knew how to play. It was a lot of fun! 
It’s a reference to the in-game PFP I use that depicts the soldier with “Born to Build” written on his helmet. I’m sorry if you didn’t realise that, I presume not everyone has that PFP.
1 Like
I didn’t directly criticize you, Buddy.
Although I don’t know about this meme.
But your battle data is there, its let everyone knows you are also completing all the battle tasks.
The data and the replay make it very easy to understand.
However, some extreme individuals tend to overinterpret things. Their extreme viewpoints have existed since 2021, for instance: “New players must build respawn points for old players”; “New players need to constantly charge towards strategic points and stay inside them.” ； “Players with low skills need to provide battlefield intelligence to players of higher levels.” “Infantry must mark the paths for aircraft and tank players”; “High-level players engage in killing, while low-level players provide support”; “Single-player players need to serve the squad players（3~4 player）” ；“He came here to play games, so he can do whatever he wants to have fun.” “It’s his freedom that he wasted 12 troops in 30 minutes to kill 5 people.” “Using the weapon with the highest weight in the room, BR, but contributing very little to the victory, it’s not his fault, but it’s others’ problem.” “You’ve scored too much, my teammate. You must hand over this position/vehicle/weapon setup to me, or else you can die.”；“Whenever I’m driving, I always want to make turns whenever I want, and change lanes whenever I want. Everyone must give way to me. Otherwise, I will definitely target you, especially since you are playing the role of my teammate.”，Of course, there is also another extreme type of player. Their viewpoint: “Why do you insist that we build additional stations?” “The resurrection points you built are more than enough for us to use!” ； “Why do you insist on seizing the strategic point to end the battle? I’ve only killed 10 enemies! Stop it, or I’ll cause some damage!” ； “？ “Why didn’t you build the ammunition boxes for me? I’ve already killed five people (10 minutes have passed).” “The strategic point is the one with the shortest straight-line distance. So why should I care about the two flanks?” ； “The rooftop construction respawn points and sandbags are so great! The suggestions from the lone wolf players will definitely be more useful in the army mode!” ； “Any facilities set up on the map are shared and automatically updated on the map. This is what Dday’s machine guns and other games have told me.” ；“Why should I launch an attack? I’m crouched at the initial fixed respawn point, using a pistol for sniper shots. How safe is that? And it’s also not easy to be detected.”，and so on.
Only some of these viewpoints are correct, but the other mixed-up contents are their evil intentions (forming class hierarchies, dividing player groups, oppressing and enslaving, and obtaining more profits).
No worries, I didn’t take it as criticism. I suddenly realised that not everyone might be aware of the PFP I mentioned, as it might have been acquired via an event or something.
The following screenie shows just how the turntables switch so quickly, and proves just how important teamwork is key. This time we had the kills, but they had the build points.
This was the very next game from my OP. We were attacking this time, and we eventually went to the very last point… Almost had it too! Notice the build point difference between the teams.
As a match, it was probably my best run yet. 170 kills, 8 vehicle kills. 105 kills on an objective. One of my highest scores. Yet we failed to win.
All because the enemy built better.
This is what I try to teach the newbies. Kill count doesn’t matter, especially if you can’t take an enemy point. I think I spent most of the match shouting that we needed more rally points. The user “Burlock” was the only guy to oblige.
Interesting observation, is that MakkaraMake was the guy I went against in the previous match. So kudos to him. (still needs to build more, lol) .
Still, win or lose, that’s the kinda match I want to play. It was a sweatfest, at BRII too! 40 minutes for a match is insane at that level!
1 Like