What we have right now for solid is realistic what? It’s just tanks irl have a lot more failure points than in enlisted and a successful penetrations almost always means the crew abandons the tank.
If devs actually cared about japan half of their vehicles would not be 1 BR to high (or stated at that and had to be corrected after a long fight).
It is prety clear that japan isnt the favorite child for DF.
1 Like
Another Germany vs Russia map you say?
Same thing - the outcome should be realistic - the way to this outcome can be rainbow deadly fog inside the tank or what ever ridiculous nonsense, as long as a tank that hits a target, and said target would be done in reality- so it should in the game.
A good start would be giving all ally tanks (save for grant and lee 75 for now as I think that’s up for debate) apcbc. Would help effectiveness across the board
1 Like
Would help especially premium M8A1 scott.
As of now, the vehicle is straight up downgrade to normal M8 Scott. So there’s no reason for people to buy it at all.
Chaffee at least isn’t open topped.
2 Likes
Yes it would- however my problem with this is that there are some tanks that were famous with their anti tank power but in game suck because they never had any APHE rounds ( Sherman Firefly for example)
Would you rather finally fix post pen damage and fix this issue for all vehicles, or do you think inventing fake rounds that never existed to be an adequate solution?
1 Like
APCBC would be more than sufficient to solve the problem of all the ally tanks damage, save for the churchill VII. 17 pounder is great with apcbc. Very good damage actually. Have no clue why in game it uses uncapped solid shot. Probably cuz the devs do not play war thunder qand just pick the default shells
1 Like
Also when i say apcbc that does not have explosive filler save for the chaffee m8a1 lee and grant. and its a real life round and is seen in war thunder. For 17 pounder it is at least more historically accurate than basic ap, tho apc is the most realistic for it.
That’s incorrect. It does have explosive filler. It is the same round the 75mm Shermans have - M61.
did you read what i said? Do me a favor and check the 37mm, 2 pounder, 6 pounder, and 17 pounder
There’s no APCBC round without explosive filler that was ever used by Chaffee, M3 Lee, M8A1 Scott and so. War thunder doesn’t have such option.
AGAIN. read what I said. Literally takes 2 seconds.
I said apcbc would NOT mean explosive filler for the solid shot tansk SAVE for m24, m8a1, grant, lee
Idk what you meant by the word “save”. Maybe I just misunderstood.
If yes, I apologize.
save here means except
1 Like
Who thought it is necessary to increase BR of de Lisle carbine? The weapon still looks pretty weak even after the buff. Especially for BR2. I think its BR should stay as it is of now.
2 Likes
100% - it doesn’t belong on BR V no matter how massive Gaijin would buff it
1 Like
Well its worse then the rifleman squad US variant and this is assaulter weapon so yeah hardly is BR V material but I still dont get why its even the game I mean who asked for it xD
2 Likes
Ai improvements are too hard for them
1 Like