Tank Destroyers should be available sooner in the unlock tree instead of being so high up

Suggestions
1

Tank destroyers, at the moment, are both mostly inaccessible and impractical to field.

In the very least, making them available sooner in a campaign gives lower-level players the ability to counter vehicles unlocked very late into the campaigns, preventing them from dominating a match.

In exchange, they won’t have as much infantry-support capabilities, but it at least means that matches won’t devolve into a match where whoever has the highest campaign level vehicles will dominate a match until they get bombed.

This would mean that a lapse in attention from a higher-level player will incapacitate or completely destroy their vehicle. In exchange, they enjoy a competitive weapons platform that can do both AT and AP.

10 Likes
2

Preferably as a second tank, but not the first.

4 Likes
3

I disagree, the Semovente is a prime example of being too low down. It is catastrophically overpowered against Daimler and A13s while being adequate against Grants, but almost useless vs Infantry. Denying the Axis from having a capable higher tiered tank.

Moscow could do with a TD because the armor there ramps us really quickly, while berlin, they seem pretty obsolete due to the fausts.

Normandy, I don’t have enough interest in to see what goes on there to be honest.

4

in berlin they are especially bad because of all the map clutter

5

It’s almost as if the semovente and grant are introduced too early into the campaign.
It’s almost as if we needed other tanks to fill the gaps first.

3 Likes
6

I would definitely love to see a Stug III in the Moscow campaign! I feel that in Berlin the TDs are kind of wasted anyway due to the clutter.

1 Like