What nonsense are you talking about?
Ho-Ri is the biggest OP tank.
Also, Kikka is currently the only aircraft among all Jets with a perfect attack and defense.
Although the Attacker has a subtitle, considering Kikka and the Pacific’s distinctive aircraft carrier AA, it’s not as bad as one might think.
Even if the T-44-100 is added, Ho-Ri still remains the best OP.
That’s because Ho-Ri’s performance is that much better.
Yeah good luck against nations that can rotate 5 aircrafts… xD How Kikka is better then Meteor or F-80A-5 by what magic exactly ? and you can put two at the same time…
So I keep trying to spawn kill on the opponent’s plane with Kikka on 4Squad.
Honestly, this is actually very valid.
Even if they are caught from behind, the aircraft’s performance is so good that it is also easy to escape by aircraft carrier.
Meteor’s attack performance has been heavily nerfed by the bomb nerf, so it is now used only for AA, and in the case of the F-80, its AA is weaker than Kikka’s.
Each has one problem in terms of attack and defense.
But Kikka is perfect at both.
Since the Pacific aircraft carrier AA is a problem anyway, Meteor isn’t an issue either.
Kikka can be shot by most aircrafts even Yak -3 can deal with you since you have no much ammo. Most of the times in two vs two battles you are useless with kikka since you cant help your ground attacker every time when you are in 2 vs 2 match you know the Kikka is a solo player literally the worst pilots are kikka players that requires zero skill to learn and its just spam aircraft with little trigger control that is easily destroyed against a competent ally player or soviet player at BR V since they can equip more aircrafts then you can.
The game is pure P2W when it comes to air battles.
I don’t think U following a strategy that fits Kikka.
But I seem to remember saying this before,
Because the Kikka has extraordinarily superior engine power and vertical lift, it must claim the ultra-high altitude advantage. (2000~3000)
It is an altitude that no other airplane can ever reach.
You should make the most of this advantage.
This is only possible with Kikka; other Jets are either too difficult to climb up there or impossible.
Kikka is a solo player plane that is literally go to the spawn point spam go back resupply go again since it has very short ammo and a big bomb it requires no skill to use at all. Its the easiest Jet to learn all you need is trigger control.
It’s definitely good.
But as I said, only Kikka can employ that kind of strategy that other airplanes cannot.
Maximizing this advantage makes it easier to outmaneuver the opposing aircraft or counterattack.
But this is off-topic.
That’s BS the Kikka and the Meteor require very little skill to learn and use and the average Kikka pilot and the average meteor pilot can learn their aircraft much easier then the rest of the 3 jets that actually require some minimal brain activity. Most of the kikka players are solo players that god forbids you have one as a wingman in a 2 vs 2 battle you know you are doomed.
I’m sorry but who in right mind, climbs in Enlisted purposefully like that?
What, just for trying to kill their aircraft? Your team would really appreciate that ig when they badly needed CAS. 
Also come on now. Kikka has really bad turn ratio compared to any of the US jets(Which, the turn ratio is like ten times more important than the pure climb rate in Enlisted environment)and a single 800 kg <<<<< 2x 1000 lbs. Simple as that.
It is true that it is easy to use.
However, the only difference is that, due to the superior performance gap between the units, there is a strategy that only Kikka can use.
Just as the Meteor counterattacks before turning with superior maneuverability, Kikka can counterattack with superior altitude—that’s the difference.
Did anti-fascist German citizens look ridiculous when Germany was constantly plummeting into madness in the 1930-40s?
Just because we already have fake BS in-game doesn’t mean we need to open the BS floodgates and all be happy.
And later he will spawn his other plane and shoot you at the back. Really what you are explaining its a waste of time specially if you are against something with good roll rate that can go just on a trade off with you.
Because even if do it like this, team will already be pushing the ground on their own anyway.
Because Ho-Ri is an OP and the infantry’s longsword movement speed has an advantage, JP is a bit more advantageous in ground combat.
If can’t even do this, that means team is incompetent, not the airplane’s problem.
Should set aside the fact that the team is incompetent.
It’s because the problem is with the person.
But when facing the US, this is the right answer.
Because JP is a bit more advantageous on the ground side
So the US tries to deal with it somehow by plane, so just eliminating that can make the game easier.
Well with USSR is the same they are a bit worse then US but they have a lot of pilot squads. Not to mention their ground attacker has a lot of guns at the back so I dont see how you can claim that USSR have worse aircrafts then Japan at BR V since they dont.
Lots of wishful thinking right there. 
Ho-Ri is only “OP”(Sort of? but not really since it lacks the utility) in the pacific maps because some pacific maps have lots of areas that could either grey zone camping or just able to hurling HE at long range. This is the same reason that Sherman 105mm is so pain in the arse to deal with on those pacific maps. Sure, sword thing is a valid argument ig.
Again, lots of wishful thinking. Also, if we are really going to compare it with supposedly equally skilled team, then i think stacked Japan team has zero chance against stacked US team. Provided ofc, that both side is equally skilled and fully utilizes what’s available to them.
Both were used in Enlisted before (modern warfare event experiment).
So they are usable and therefore, should get added.
( 
)
its a tank that can be killed by a flamethrower and has no top armor. Its a tank destroyer. Tiger II is much better tank.
Arguably, if the vehicles are being less involved then Japan has even less chance against Soviet than US because Hei-automatic just can’t one shot soldiers with body armor which all stacked team deploys on all of their soldiers and difference between one shot down and two shot down is huuuge in because split seconds outcome matters in such stacked games.
Honestly, the USSR is a little more horrifying.
In my opinion, among the four factions, the USSR has the weakest air power.
Of course, JP only has one Kikka, but considering how outstanding Kikka’s performance is, and that the Su-9’s performance is the lowest among all the Jets.
And as for the Tu-2s, honestly, I don’t think I like it,
In BR5, the attack aircraft also depends heavily on the performance of the planes, but the Tu-2s are somewhat heavy and also a little slow.
The only reason why the plane issue doesn’t appear in USSR vs JP is that the map itself is the biggest problem.
Because infantry combat is mostly valid on its own.
In fact, that map isn’t very easy to use properly even with tanks, except in certain areas