T 34 instead of t 28

Suggestions
30

Apart from being outside the battle timeline - with what logic??

1 Like
31

Enough with asking for that thing

1. Adding Pz-3L is much better than asking for F2 because 3L has better armour and more balanced gun.
And most importantly it was developed in 1941 unlike the Pz 4F2 that was developed in 1942

2. How many times do I have to say that Enlisted ain’t warthunder. All braindead warthunder players think about the F2 and completely ignore the fact that Pz-3L is much more suited for anti-infantry protection.
In Enlisted, Panzer 4F2 will work only as a tank destroyer while Panzer 3L is more of a main battle Tank

Anyways, stop asking for that thing
This game is not Warthunder

1 Like
32

One could say the same thing about repeated requests for the T-34, when there is absolutely nothing in the current German arsenal to counter it.

1 Like
33

No,thanks .
I hope never to see the battle of Kursk in Enlisted

1 Like
34

That’s just worng, idk why you think so man but both the Pz 3 J and the Pz 4 F1 can Destroy the T-34 at any range that we have right now in the game.

(I’ll explain where) Pz 4f1- turret frontal sides, lower frontal plate and higher frontal plate.

PZ 3 J (and every thing that comes after it)- turret frontal sides and higher frontal plate

1 Like
35

There are players who want t-34 removed
But majority wants t-34 to stay
Look here:

36

It cannot penetrate the hull without HEAT.

Cannot pen the hull either, as long as its slightly angled.

1 Like
37

Yes the Pz f1 with HEAT ammunition can pen the front of T-34 EVERY WHERE.

and Pz 3 J1 can pen the lower side of the frontal plate, the neck and the turret frontal sides. May I ask you what rank are you in the soviet side bias chack

1 Like
38

but it does not get any HEAT in Enlisted, lol. Only HE and APHE.

And we have the Pz3E, not J1.

39

So when we get the T-34 give it HEAT it isn’t hard.
And add the better Pz 3s…

1 Like
40

The pz4 is ment to be infantry support. Adding HEAT to it would make it the best tank in the campaign for Germany and make the other tanks obselete. Realistically speaking, the HEAT round was more rare than the APCR for the 37/50mm guns.

And if the devs really wanted to add T-34 they would have added the better Pz3 by now. But we still got a Pz3B soooooooo

41

We already have better panzers in game smh and HEAT isn’t very effective ammunition against infantry…
Chack what tanks we have in game…

1 Like
42

No they are not in game lmao. That’s alpha.
They got removed for a reason.
And the HEAT round would in fact work pretty well against infantry, as it still is partially an HE round. The blast is smaller because it’s focussed into one side, aka the AT part, but there is still an HE effect.

43

No they didn’t, they got removed because we are in CBT they said that they gonna add more levels (what means more tanks) when we go OBT and even more at full release SMH

44

it is not officially confirmed we are getting any of these tanks back.

45

It isn’t confirmed that we won’t. And in fact there’s bigger chance that we’ll get them because they already started adding them (panzer 4 F-1 and T-28) smh

46

You know sometimes you should leave bais a side the T-34 won’t be OP and you’ll be able of killing it frontly.

47

these have been suggested for a while now and are actually pretty balanced, due to having less armor penetration but better HE.

Or maybe we should nerf it from war thunder level stuff to historical level stuff:
Make the sight extremely narrow, as on early models they would often rush production and not actually install a sight and only drill a hole.
Make the reload very long (15-30 seconds), as the early models had very cramped turrets, with an average fire rate of 2 rounds a minute in the field, despite being capable of 6-7 rounds per minutes in a test with the gun outside of the turret.

48

I don’t think they added those tanks because they been suggested. They added those tanks because we are getting close to OBT and like they said they need to add more levels. Why it’s so hard for people here to say that they are worng…

49

Why is it so hard for you to actually use factually correct arguments?
literally all I have been doing here is debunking your arguments because they are wrong lmao.

  • The pz3e and pz4f1 cannot pen the T-34 hull
  • We got no HEAT for Pz4
  • We got no Pz3J
  • We got none of those “better tanks”
  • They have not confirmed these tanks will return

Instead of using arguments that are pure bullshit and saying “devs will do X”, use the stuff we actually have in game right now. You can not control the actions of the devs.

And the funny thing is I am not even against the addition of the T-34. I just don’t want people to just spout lies just to get their way.

I am fine with adding the T-34 as long as it’s stats are nerfed towards historical values instead of the more arcade-like values from war thunder.

1 Like