Since there already is stuff like that it hardly makes any differency to add more.
True, other way to work around is to alter stats of the weapons.
I doubt theres too many people intrested of having a ppsh for example that aproximately shoots to same direction as barrel points.
Since after all the game is 99% of time shooting bots, I doubt people would be intrested to learn recoil patterns similar to csgo to balance certain rifle caliber automatics.
And the campaigns are going to get removed so while waiting merge why not ?
by that logic we could add t32 or t34 cause it doesnt matter. we could also add maus etc.
difference is that it doesnt really bring anything beneficial for campaign. you will have more than half campaign equipment ineffective against it (doesnt matter if we talk about KT or tiger h1). you will only bring new toys to veterans that will use it and abuse it against anyone who is not on end game content.
overall not beneficial update to do pre merge. but post merge will be different situation cause those new toys will see players that can actually counter them.
Yeah, game totally doesnt disgrace entire ww2 by adding AI thats top5 in worst AI ever.
Dont really mind, as long as it has something to counter it
No one knows when the merge is coming, now ppl is stacking campaigns where the bestestest equipment is.
So why not, add some of those toys to other campaigns to have atleast some reason to play currently not so populated campaigns.
The current “ass-ymmetrical” balance is so blown out of ass, that I dont really think it makes any differency lets say in moscow, will you die to t34 which u cant destroy with pz3 or will you die to t-90.
Result pretty much is the same your dead.
That’s literally so obvious and the biggest gripe I have with the devs/campaign systen/the idea of “add new better stuff”.
Like it was obvious that T-34 in Moscow would be insane against early German tanks. So if your only solution is to add a fictional Pz 4 F2, then just don’t add T-34 to Moscow.
What story? Jumbo, m2 in Normandy, rd 44 in Berlin, mkb and f2 in the battle for Moscow. There is no historicity, so you need to add more weapons that will be in the development branches
for the moscow…bren seems too weak for a late unlock
dont think mp41(r) was in production at that time but zk sounds good
for stalingrad…sten sounds weak and stupid we will be getting kv1 with zis5 cannon apparently
tunisia seems ok aside from mas 38 if it was sooner and had free french forces squad it would be nice… dont think they used johnson lmg there tho
normandy sure… but ovp seems to weak and mp40/1 is basically the gold order erma emp since theres stg 44 it wont be used that much
berlin… why give russkies bren or bar when they have RD44? again beltfed mg34/42 sounds good:+1:
pacific .idk but i think its too soon for shermans but would be nice to see smth before shermans, british tanks mby or the m13 with 75mm,idk how japanese would get access to berretas tho
No but the British (and russians for some reason) issued 100 round mags so they were indeed issued that way in WW2, and M2 Carbine is a WW2 gun. The 120 round thing is a post war thing, not issued lile that during WW2. Devs have a few strange standards, but they are relatively consistent to them. From those standards, best you can hope for is 250/0 some day.
M2 Carbine is a WW2 gun, and the other weapons are prototypes during their respective period of the war. If you can prove that there was even a prototype 100 round belt for the MG 42, then maybe. If not, wait for 250/0, if the devs decide to add that
But it was never issued that way. Also, 250/0 would be fine because the Americans can also get a 1919 like that since they issued belts in sets of 100 or 250, so give the Germans a 250/0 MG 42 and then give the Americans a 250/0 M1919A6 and boom, problem solved.
