Of coarse the game has issues that need to be worked on, but in my opinion those aren’t even that big of a deal that it impacts the state of the game
I already explained why we need the new levels
2 Likes
While yes during the war everyone captured anything if the situation arose, but I do not support a blanket captured weapon addition because I find it takes away from the gear that makes each country unique. Of coarse I do not mind if there are captured weapons here and there, but there should be some standards and thought process. For example, the MP 717 is a PPSh rechambered for German ammo, so therefore we have an excuse to have a German PPSh besides capturing them in battle.
German captured tons of stuff but I don’t think we can just have a whole line of captured weapons in the Progression. Captured SVT → Captured Mosin → Captured This ->Captured that. Would it be cool, yeah of coarse. But would it be ideal, no
Imagine we end up with a match where the entire German team is using the same exact weapons as the enemy team. It would take away the experience of playing a unique faction
Now with the Soviet Union I’d argue Lend Lease is a completely different situation than captured weapons. I’d love to have more Lend Lease stuff
2 Likes
Tunisia is a lost cause the bots don’t work half of the time we need to bring a stack in there to win
1 Like
Tell that to the Berlin campaign where they just stole a Panzerfausts
1 Like
See this is one of those complicated situations. On one hand the Soviet Union did capture stores of Panzerfausts as they moved West, but at the same time what I said about captured weapons above.
I’ve thought maybe instead AT weapons can drop from dead soldiers so if you want to have a Panzerfaust as a Russian you have to go out and hunt it.
1 Like
Yes, it’s necessary to fight the best tanks in the game, not to introduce salvaged weapons for the sake of salvaged weapons. Can bring in enough weapons without creating trophies
I went around poking and found this they could have this instead of stealing a Panzerfausts
1 Like
And here’s an idea if the Soviets won a panzerfaust how about they go to find a supply cache in the battlefield where panzerfaust lying around.
And the German secondary objective is to blow up those supply caches
a good idea for multi-staged battles, I cant see it happen though.
lets face it, DF is biased thats why USSR got the good stuff.
2 Likes
That’s true but it can be done in the bunker on Normandy the main bunker at the very bottom there’s a sword you can pick up This game can work with random weapons lying around the battlefield Pacific campaign is a great example as well you can pick up Lunge mines lying around
1 Like
Playerbase is dwindling bcs of lack of content ?
I havent seen this much of a wrong prognosis.
Playerbase is dwindling because devs adding uneccesary content while ignoring tons of core problems and bugs of the game. Non existent balance and matchmaking is not event need to be mentioned
2 Likes
after ppsh41 drum and fedorov you want a downgrade?
trash
ffs we dont need more unbalanced end game content.
perfect normandy tank. we could also add abrams while we are at it.
yes… bring more unbalanced end game stuff in normandy…
I’m already aware of all your concerns thank you.
A nice way to contradict yourself
If you don’t want new levels than say that.
Also I believe you did fail to see the bigger picture, all the content added now would better prepare the game for the merge update.
1 Like
what is contradiction. sten is trash and tigers are unbalanced end game content. so either you put shit weapons for end game content, or you put overly OP stuff for end game content. both are bad.
you fail to see imbalance you would introduce with OP content.
1 Like
I understand balance arguments but I think people have to understand this is a WW2 sandbox. To make a point, I want the King Tiger in Normandy because it was there, and I want the Tiger I in Tunisia because it was there.
In addition to just being setting appropriate, everything has its pros, cons, roles, etc. I love facing the mighty Kv-1 in Stalingrad, and I can’t wait til they add the Kv-2 one day. Will I get blown up, yeah, but that’s just part and parcel of the game
Otherwise we might as well not any more content at all if it’s like a never ending seesaw
“Y U kill me!?! U no kill me! I kill U! gAmE bRoKeN!”
3 Likes
That’s the allies in a nutshell they dislike anything that can kill them and that’s why we still don’t have a 100 round belt fed MG yet.
Oh and I can’t forget tanisha is a hellscape and Why did the allies in Tunisia Need a motorcycle with 250 rounds while the Germans only have 50
2 Likes
I think this was hinted at for after merge.
I like me some 90mm guns.
1 Like
they are removing levels entirely so thank god
and there is nothink i would hate more then seeing americans run around with drum mags in tommy guns, 
and that should come post merge when you could have some balance.
also is the solution to KT in normandy pershing? shall we trade one historically accurate thing for inaccurate one?
- my first maxed campaign was axis normandy, second was ally normandy and third will be ally moscow. then i will max axis pacific. i am not ally main
- you are tiresome with the 100 rounds MG. axis normandy have perfectly ok MG.
1 Like