And one question. Would you be happy if they changed the SDKFZ 251 9 to a BR1-2 tank?
2 Likes
not ideal, but its much preferable.
removing all HE shells would also do IMO since its 52mm pen is useless in BR3 so it would be only used as an APC (thus this change would be less toxic to players that already own it).
btw: stummel was only added because devs ported it straight out of WT, not because it was such a great idea to begin with.
1 Like
I fail to see how is that revelant for the game’s needs. Every APC in the game has totally unrealistic capacity. Yet somehow it’s problem with only these two.
This is total BS, a deliberate lie. All vehicles were used for troop transportation to some extent.
2 Likes
So you want to make everything useless?
useless?
How is a mobile rally point useless?
thats the only job an APC should have to function as mobile rally point, but instead you want a tank that takes up an APC slot.
Well, its main purpose is lost. What’s the point of putting a cannon in there when it can’t deal with tanks or infantry? And it’s only going to get worse than that premium team, they have 6 specialists, and a MG with decent vision, while you’re stuck with two medics.
all vehicles are used for carrying something, not necessarily soldiers, there were numerous ammo carrier vehicles, armoured recovery vehicles, fuel trucks ect…
1 Like
stummel had a crew of 5 (but only has 4 in game) and could probably fit a 6th personnel as well if devs werent lazy…
Stop twisting the reality.
The Stummel has a much slower reload time than its tank counterparts with “same” cannon, the crew doesn’t have a tank related perks, using its cannon is extremely situational because you just don’t want to draw attention to it.
It doesn’t even come close to being comparable to tanks. And not even if it had stayed on BR2.
You are just against anything that’s unique. And everything needs to be just 1:1 with its dedicated role.
1 Like
I took the trouble to find that event page. I laughed out loud when I compared his(or her?) messages on that page and in this suggestion. The double standards on this forum are so funny.
Comrade Commissar doing background research for finding some dirt on someone, how accurate XD.
clearly not the case since that event was a year or more ago while I have been on the opinion that APCs and rider class vehicles shouldnt have a cannon larger than 20mm since mid 2024.
Just take a look at my APC suggestion from about a month ago, I wanted suggest many different unique vehicles without the ability to spam HE, but most ended up being cut out, you can see them in the sneak peek of cut ideas.
1 Like
Hmmm. Even with the HE shells its still probably my least favourite to use.
My least favorite to use is probably LVT. Too big and clunky. And its MGs are extremely underwhelming.
1 Like
I actually love this thing. Very well protected and my mg gunners tend to clean up.
Just had a 220 kill game with the LVT and churchill leading the way
I like to get in close with APCs to make use of the rally part of it. Having a cannon and small crew makes you want to sit back…not really what i want
1 Like
Well, it’s true I have played it only in BR5.
1 Like
I imagine that would make most apcs feel crappy (except bren carrier…i have mine at BR 5…it rocks)
I have my LVT geared out for BR 2…but i use in both BR 2 and 3. Pretty fun (gear doesnt matter as much as the AI use mgs anyway)
2 Likes
For the same reason the 3N retained its AP rounds even on its pure HEAT loadouts… just to limit the actually usefull rounds.
1 Like
Guess who was suggesting to replace its APCBCs for HEs
2 Likes
I also did. So what?
Well tbf this time, it may be allied gear, but the soviets were the only ones to really use it as intended.
1 Like