Yup, for instance the sniper Lee Enfield in BR3 has mag reload in-game rather than being loaded by clips (though given the scope getting in the way, the gun could realistically be loaded by clips…)
The gun could, the configuration couldnt (scope)…As far as I know 
(Mine certainly didnt have the right scope mounts to pull it off, but thats a more modern mount):. Choices being single feed (like the PT 14) or detach.
Not sure if the SVT-38 Sniper had room for stripper or not (looks like it does)
2 Likes
cough M2 carbine (the better weapon) has been in the game since the old Normandy campaign, so the T20 was not needed
2 Likes
yeah the m2 is a great assault rifle a shitty select fire rifle
the m2 is not as good as the fg42 1 or 2
its more comparable to the stg 44
sure if you want to nerf is accuracy and buff its damage to rifle levels it be a perfect rifle
wait you mean like the current tank/attacker gr/us meta is perfectly balanced
and there is no need to nerf us rockets or give gr rockets
sure if you mean the m2 is balanced against the fg 42 1 and 2 in that way agree
1 Like
Except where they choose to make it relevant - as in this case it is a point of difference
And you know THAT at least as well.
No, because I don’t want a weapon to be artificially handicapped. Just give Germany BR3 better tt semi or drop zh-29 to BR3.
Stripper clip reload just sucks. G41 and type 4 are just terrible weapons and shouldn’t be buffed to unreasonable state. Just release better weapons as alternatives.
1 Like
But then you have to remove the g41, type 4 and garand
Because without buffs the g41 type 4 and garand
Are not good enough to be at the same br as the zh 29 or g43
That is they would be too weak for the new br3 and to strong for br2
There is the Johnson r a ten round magazine fed rifle
And the zh 29 could go to Japan
But we would loose 3 guns including the iconic garand
2 Likes
Yup, they do what suits them (double standards…or at the least no consistancy). Not gonna stop calling it out
2 Likes
garand is good so I don’t know what to complain about. The thing is, g41/type4/johnson just can’t compete with mag reload semi and this is perfectly fine. Dev can give them better accuracy even more damage but ppl will always choose mag reload.There are so many filler weapons anyway, like devs won’t make all those German BR2 filler smg suddenly better than pps43.
How so, literally every faction have better semi than Germany. Who even use tt semi these days. The first priority is always event/bp semis that vastly outperform any tt semi. Also, I don’t think many would consider a good 10 round mag semi to be op.
correct the garand is perfectly balanced against the g41,
ok the g41 with a buf to reload from 4.5 to 3.75 seconds
but the g43 has 2 more rounds and reload 50% fasterg43 2 seconds garand 3 secondsthe us does not even have a br 4 rifle
its not the magazine its the reload
the g43 has a 2 second reload
i dont care about the garands greater damage
both the g41 and garand kill or down a soldier in one hit any damage difference is irrelevant
the g43 is not op at br4 at br3 it would be
just like the garand would be op at br2
br2 5/6 shot sa
br3 8 shot or 2 x 5 strtipper clip
br4 10 shot magazine
ibkt the sv38 breaks this rule so no the garand and the g43 do not belong it the same br unless
--------g43------------garand
a 2 second 1.5 second
b 3 second 2.25 seconds
c 4 second 3 second
not acceptable
damage buffs or nerfs as long as both down or kill in one shot any damage number differences are meaningless
dispersion/accuracy as long as they both have semi auto accuracy there its again meaningless, and no one would allow the g43 to drop to full auto accuracy
no the bayonet is meaningless, there are a few prototype garands with a ten round magazine but again that means moving the garand to br2 which no one want or removing it.
so unless you can think of a way to buff the garand or nerf the g43 other than reload the g43 needs to stay at br4
the johnson and the garand are literally the only tech tree br3 us rifles, most people dont have enough other br3 rifles to arm their soldiers sorry if you can just buy an arsenal but a lot of people cant.
how about this we make a 13 round garand then move the g43 to br3 and see how you feel about having a 25 percent smaller magazine
1 Like
Reality is BR3 10-15 round mag reload tt/event/bp semi
BR4 20 round mag semi
I don’t understand why you focus on the balance of tt semi so much. It just doesn’t matter as much as smg, lmg, vehicle balance. 10 round mag reload semis just don’t perform that differently. Do you run multiple 9 men semi squads? Otherwise, you would have good event/bp semi for main squads and tt for secondary squads. Or do you think g43 is better than m1907?
If you don’t have event/bp weapons, bad for you but everybody else (I mean the players who actually still play the game) has them, and those event/bp weapons should be taken into consideration when we talk about balance. Its like excluding tommy .30 and xa38 when discussing US BR3 balance. They are in every match. If you don’t have those fancy weapons, you may be better off playing other faction/BR and waiting for rerun and lootboxes.
You make no sense if you don’t care about the tech tree then hands off it. You can’t say tech tree does not matter then demand the zh 29 and g43 are lowered to br3. Rifles arm riflemen, radio, engineers, mortarmen ECT there the filler in just about every squad including but not limited to
Rifleman
Mortar
Radio
At
Machine gun
Apc
Or you could remove the g43 and zh29 from the tech tree
Make it an event or premium weapon then lower it to br3, after you confiscate everyone’s g43 and zh29 rifle
Sure as soon as the m1907!is made a tech tree br3 weapon you can lower the g43 to br3
Oh wait it’s br4 so at the very least compare it to an event br3 allied gun
You compare tech tree to tech tree
Event to event
And premium to premium
2 Likes
Or how about this we
A have a ten round garand with both the garand and g43 having a 2 second reload
B both have 8 rounds with a 3 second reload
But calling a 10 round 2 second reload g43 and
A 8 round 3!second reload garand the same br is a sign of mental illness
Or we could lower the bar to br2 and the g43 to br3 because nothing matters
1 Like
Well, you can always argue they are different but they are still in the same match. It’s DF fault for their fomo event bs but you also need to be realistic about it. Tommy. 30 and xa38 don’t magically disappear from the match if you think tt to tt event to event. Funny thing is, US BR3 gets matched with German BR4 quite often but still wins most of the time unless facing stacks. Nobody complains about g43 but tiger/panther/kiraly/event mg. You are literally complaining about the least impactful aspect.
Again, why shouldn’t m1907 matter? How many semis in total do you have in your US BR3 lineup? 6,7,10,20? 4 out of those numbers is a sizeable percentage, let along m1907 is always your first choice, which means you are playing more with m1907 than with garand. The whole tt/event divide is flawed. Can I say US BR3 has the worst smg and attacker just because their tt version sucks?
Because br4 can only fight br 3 4 and 5
While br 3 can only see br 2 3 and 4
That means the g43 would be able to see 10 round bolt actions and the 15 round m1 carbine
A 15:round semi auto that takes two rounds to kill
The br3 us smg tt does not suck
Us has one of the best tt br2 smg
An average br3 smg
And the worst br4 smg
And stop ignoring me
I am sure if the garand had a 13 round magazine that reloaded in 1 second
You would find it to be a fair match for the g43 with it’s 10 round magazine and 2 second reload
And yes math it out that would be the same advantage the g43 would currently enjoy over the present garand
The g43 has a 25 percent larger magazine
The g43 reloads 50 percent faster than the garand
Actually I ,Iike it 13 rounds and 1 second reload at br3 we could call it the mezo garande
I get it br5 sucks the gulf between br4 and 5 rifles is bigger then between br3 and 4
You don’t get to save br4 by partially destroying br3
One issue the us and japan does not have a br4 tech tree rifle and the garand is not a br4:rifle
Br5 rifles need to just be removed from the game or moved to br6
You could then have a sa 20 round rifle class at br5
Second the g43 belongs in br3 as much as the garand belongs in br2
Or as much as the amaguerra 39 belongs in br3
Also the fact that the sv38 is broken should be taken as an exception and not the rule
We all know how broken the user faction is
Also no gr is not the weakest faction
It goes ussr number 1, gr number 2 us number 3 and I think Japan is somewhere
So what? Is it fair for pz4f1 against kv1/Sherman/xa38? Mp40 against ppsh41/tommy . 30? Uptier is uptier, it is unfair by design. I don’t know how it suddenly become fair to give m1907 free license to farm armaguerra, or demanding garand to BR 2 because BR1 is magically taken out of the equation. Can ppl actually be honest and stop bringing about uptier/downtier before sorting out first the internal balance of the BR in question?
Oh yes, such a big difference that allow you to kill one more soldier in theory. Tell me, how many soldiers do you actually kill with a whole mag. You are making semi look like sf rifles. I am sure you get 5 kills with g43 and 10 with fg42 per mag on average.By your logic, Bren at BR 2 is game-breakingly op compared with mg13/zb26/breda because of mag size and reload and type otsu is impossible to play against because of reload? How about you actually think twice about in-game performance and combat effectiveness?
Arguing against g43/zh29 downtier for having something at BR4 is different from actually believing there is a huge difference between g43/svt38/svt40/garand. No matter what you wish for BR balance, the simple fact is that currently BR 3 semi department is dominated by 10-15 round mag reload semi and BR 4 by 20 round mag semi. You simply can’t complain about g43/svt40 being op when m1907 is literally BR3.
Bro, if you seriously think for a sec that the difference between g43 and garand is comparable to armaguerra at BR3, you are totally lost
best tt for sure but hardly as an exception when all the event/go/bp semis exist.
Fedorov did get reloaded with spare mags, you are delusional, what you are trying to do is bringing up unrelated shit to say that a gun with detachable magazine should be reloaded with stripper clips because other guns with non detachable magazines are, that is wrong
1 Like
Touched a nerv with the federov aye
See “turner and enfield have detach mags”
6 Likes
“tee hee touched a nerve”
Just stop, really, youre making no sense
1 Like