Looks like Karelia


Not bad but Manchuria would be much more interesting
Looks like Karelia


Not bad but Manchuria would be much more interesting
Couple of updates ago you guys added an option to continue shooting bolt action rifles WITHOUT cancelling aiming down sights (it was added only for a handful of rifles).
Are you still planning of adding this feature to the rest of the bolt action rifles?
No, that feature is only for specific rifles on purpose
I’m glad that you finally made some additions to the rewards for single-player kills. I’ve seen it too many times. Because teammates would be shooting from behind or vehicles would be scavenging infantry in the no-man’s land. There was simply no situation like the one where we were attacking the objective but lost the game due to poor performance. But when it came to the final tally, it was often those who relied on vehicles and shooting from behind. They got higher scores than us who worked hard and did the actual tasks. I want to know more about this. Is it that the score for close-range kills can be multiplied by a factor or is it only in specific circumstances like defending the objective where the score doubles? This really boosts the enthusiasm of the troops to attack. Maybe there will be fewer players using vehicles and shooting from behind in the future. I hope this announcement can be properly implemented. After all, the score for vehicles has already been reduced by 150 points. Any further cuts would make it as humorous as the planes in the Market Garden game.
And why is that if you don’t mind me asking? I’m pretty sure it was said in that devblog that this option would be added for the rest of the weapons later on.
I think as long as it doesn’t simply reuse the terrain of Arden and Berlin again, it can be considered an innovation. Don’t have too high expectations for DF. Maybe it’s necessary to consider one’s self-esteem when expecting to copy the terrain of WOT and WT.
I think your thinking about the hull mgs, I don’t think the bolt actions were mentioned in a dev blog, instead they were only mentioned in the patch notes.
This statement was still valid before the campaign merger. But now it has become “Warzone 5” in the online game. Saying this now is merely to prevent the final “cover-up” from being torn off by oneself. Even though the players are well aware of this.
What about for other curved bolt handle bolt actions?
But that’s not all - we’ll also be doubling the bonus for kills when attacking and defending the same objectives.
Please also reconsider the “objective defend” condition.
Right now it only counts if the enemy you kill is within the objective area or very close to it, while the opposite side gets “objective attack” bonus with the same conditions, which is significantly easy, and makes picking a tank on attack an obvious choice for earning points.
I suggest make it so the “objective defend” bonus is also applied when you are within your objective area and kill someone no matter their proximity. Which would greatly motivate people to stay in the objective area, instead of leaving it to avoid tank spam.
No
This feature is only for the bolties that could do it irl, because as fun as it is if it’s implemented for all then every bolt will feel the same
I think the plan was made according to the boss’s instructions. The boss makes decisions based on money. When the money runs out, they will naturally have to do something to make up for it. Now, just looking at this, it’s only about making up. They haven’t modified the double-point offensive pattern diagram yet, which indicates that their efficiency has dropped.
Preferred map system … its not working. 10 matches and 5 times bomb modus … delete it thx!
Also one more thing, will this big december update feature return of silver chests?
Because those rifles that have it, are straight pull bolt actions, which makes things different
I just want to say
Remove the 1000-pound bomb from the only high-level aircraft on the US technology tree
How will the US deal with Germany in the future
The Tiger King will be out of control in the future
No one can kill the Tiger King
Previously, it was only expected that the US Air Force’s 1000-pound bomb could kill the Tiger King
If the 1000-pound bomb of the Meteor is too powerful
Could it be changed to 1 one 1000-pound bomb and 2 five hundred-pound bombs
Or just 1 one 1000-pound bomb
At least it can restrain the Tiger King
Or say, give the technology tree a high-quality bomber or attack aircraft
Japan also lacks high-quality high-level bombers and attack aircraft
The Soviet Union is already quite comfortable
Germany at least has the 500-kilogram Stuka which can serve as a fallback option
And why should Enlisted players care what some WT players want?
WT players obviously want to play M1 Abrams in Stalingrad and fight against the Japanese there alongside Israel and China with waifu pillows and fortnite skins on their tanks, does that mean Enlisted players should suffer the fate of WT as well?
Yeah can’t wait to see the classic “we analyzed data from multiple platforms (including secret elitist discord groups) and decided to add all decals to all factions, enjoy!” – just like it happened with low BR for Berlin, when at least a sizable portion (if not half or majority) did not like the ahistorical maps test, yet y’all still pushed through with those biplanes over Reichstag, didn’t you?
Watch out for “we check all the platforms, not just the forum” card they gonna pull, mate.
They return for the first days of every major update I’m pretty sure.
Can we expect vehicle customization Gold refunds if we will be receiving major expanded vehicle customization? This way players who made due with the limited decals can have a fresh start.
AS-44, T-20, Type Hei-auto, Ho-Ri, Ci-Ri, Chi-To, Chi-Nu, Ap-Chi, Kikka, jap rocket launchers and PPS, bunch of mid/late war panzers and volksturm garbage near Moscow.
Oh, and IS-2, FG, StG and king tigers in Stalingrad.
This is bullshit.
This line can only be explained by the fact that the developers try to give museum exhibits, which have never seen real combat, characteristics as close as possible to what they would have in real combat.
It would be more correct to say - Enlisted prides itself on ALTERNATIVE historical authenticity.