well, at this point, maybe you should try to play in a group or something.
we can’t always relay on randoms even if we do our best but we are alone against a 10 actual experienced players.
which… you can’t do much about that.
every multiplayer game has this issue.
what would it be your solutions?
seems like bait
Even if you’re a sniper, you usually have problems if enemies finally cap the point. But sniper gameplay is boring, and active gameplay happens in a small battle zone near a single point… So if your team sucks, you notice that by having no fun.
That’s a regular advice, but if I wanted to, I’d already be doing that.
I just don’t like playing with someone else, unironically.
well, that’s where i snipe.
there’s always something to do in this game.
let it be, challenges, or rank up your units, or even rank up your squad.
if the things aren’t going like we want them to, there is no reason to point fingers.
it is what it is.
totally understand that.
i do that as well.
but. in your situation, what else would you do for this issue.
again, usually, it’s a bit “useless” to rant without a conclusion or solution.
Well, ranking up assaulters-3 in absolutely ruined match wasn’t so fun.
well, at this point.
you’ll either have to wait for a PVE, other competitive stuff, or custom games with at least more than 4 dudes to gain xps.
as it seems there isn’t much for you in this occasion.
That’s why I finally ask for matchmaker.
As I said, rank system only made it worse. Much worse actually.
Played used to play interesting side for a week, now they will play the most populated side for 4 weeks.
well…
problem is:
resulting to these ^
i still think there should be at least some sort of matchmaker to prevent m5s going against tigers and stuff.
but… is this really a solution?
will you enjoy playing every match to try hard just to win and keep your rank? with other people that will mainly play like us full of automatic weapons and meta squads everywhere.
i don’t know., maybe i got a bit burned out of pvp. but doesn’t look appealing to me…
Ranks made it only worse, since you often meet squads who play the most-populated side in the most cancerous way.
They should make it so that an extra rating point is given for being top 3 in the team, that way even if you lose you can still gain by having battle hero and high place on the score board.
They should just give points for losing instead of winning, so people will try to find the least winning side.
Are you playing Moscow Axis or something?
Tunisia axis comrade)))))000000
But it never was THAT bad and painful.
I love Tunisia axis, if you love it too and don’t mind paying ridiculous money for a premium tank (PZIII N) you will dominate with it. The only thing it can’t pen from the front is Sherman, other than that it easily one shots everything even Lee
2 real players in team dude
Then slaughter AI
Well, haven’t answered on that.
I play this game because I like it. I mostly like maps, mechanics, content, etc. But I hate players. Same thing I had with WT, and you know, I don’t play WT for more than a year. Sometimes I want to return, but then I remembering WHY I left it.
Again, most fps games allow you to just run around not caring about what’s happening globally (losing/taking points, etc.). This game concentrates huge amount of people in a small battle zone, so losing a point almost always means that you (personally you) lose too, dying or not getting on point in time.
So losing usually means not having fun, since you’re always near cap zone, and if you lose it, that means that you’re not near it anymore.
I don’t really get what kind of fun are having those guys who play JuSt a gAmE with 13 kills and 10 deaths (I mean players, not bots, yeah).
Indeed, it is only necessary to write about marks and rallys once, and sometimes they begin to appear.