Should BR6 be added?

Do you guys think adding BR6 will make sense? We need the famous M16s, AK-47s, G3s and guns from the near past. Since there are already, jet fighters, it shouldn’t be far away right guys?

Do you think this is more/less important than another faction/campaign? Comment what you think please.

3 Likes

Most of the community wants Enlisted to stay WW2 and expand by adding subfactions.
Devs themselves stated that they have no plans for progressing beyond WW2 either.

17 Likes

Thats pretty much what BR 5 is already. They just have different skins :stuck_out_tongue:

15 Likes

Play active matter or the new upcoming war thunder infantry if you want to play in the modern era.

5 Likes

Definitely not, we don’t even have ±0 MM yet.

5 Likes

Well yes I’m waiting for IS -3 and T -44-100 so I can play SU tanker finally :smiley:

No

1 Like

See ya in 2030 and then we could add them.

1 Like

No need for a BR6 as BR5 is as close to fantasy land as it is. :blush:

5 Likes

No need, because the BR5 is even close to the firepower of the ‘Cold War’. You can see that soldiers from Japan, the United States, the Soviet Union, and Germany all have ‘fully automatic’ rifles in their hands. :joy:

enlisted doesnt even have enough players to let everyone pick the map he wants to play.
adding BRs = stretching the few players the game has even thinner

the best indicator for whether the game actually grows and can afford steps like these is the implementation of a direct map picking method. with how gaijin messes up on a weekly basis i wouldnt expect something like that to happen before mid 2026

4 Likes

Enlisted dont have enough equipment even for 5 BRs xD

1 Like

Yes.

No.


We need to throw all the fake trash like T20 and AS-44 to BR6 and lock it at BR6 so that it never mixes with normal WW2 (BR1-5).

4 Likes

Yes please

We need BR VI desperately, it’s way too compressed now and that only leads to much of stuff in game are surplus, A BR VI with the stuff like Super Pershing, Ho-Ri, Jets etc would only make sense. add to more varied setups being played and just simply more fun.
It’s probably on the way but devs dragging their asses behind them as usual, and also since they scared to separate queues further cause of playerbase not at BF or CoD lvls… unfortunately that ain’t happening in any foreseeable future…

When we get BR VII and VIII and Cold War Maps like Korea and Vietnam, with their own Squads, much like the campaigns had.

But let’s just focus at making the current game better before explanding it shall we.

I’m waiting for Camo changing according to Map as my Nr 1…
can’t believe we don’t have it
pure laziness and incompetence with devs

Dont really even understand for what we need new BR’s when ±0 BR solves 98% of issues.

4 Likes

If they add BR6 they will probably need to include original/fictional things created by the developers themselves like Battlefield or COD do. In case they decide to do that, the ideal would be to include a “realistic mode” where they limit historically correct squads, or to include WHAT IF type maps that are specific to BR5 and a theoretical BR6.

The best implementation for BR6 wouldn’t be Cold War stuff, it would be to fix the current balancing issue going on in BR5. Since the merge we’ve gotten so many new toys to BR5 that half the tier is doesn’t really serve a purpose anymore. The devs can keep trying to rework the AVS and FG-42 1s all they want but they aren’t going to be viable when their replacement is 100k research points away.

The addition of jets only widened this gap.

±0 BR doesn’t solve the issue of daring to take iconic WW2 stuff like PPSh-41, Browning M1919 or StG-44 and having to go to fantasy land of Su-9 (1946), T-20, Ho-Ri and AS-44.

No, but customs with proper tools will solve that.

The game itself most likely will never go for historical aproach.

2 Likes