Yep… because decreasing ammo in a mag is definitely a buff… you are literally rationalizing it by being like “ohh well, they decreased the cooldown so it’s better now”
Which… is on you for not being able to control the cooldown.
And then to invalidate my suggestion with this… excuse me? That’s something they actually should have changed instead of this. Go on with that.
Maybe instead of listening to literally one dude who mentioned this they should have listened to the tens of people complaining about stinger.
I also mentioned that when i complained in the update post… so don’t try to pull that on me lmao i damn well know.
Same argument as:
Its on you for not being able to not burn through your ammo.
Dont misquote me, I said that lowering of the overheat is more a buff than lowering capacity is a nerf - now if you persist on disagreeing, then go ahead you are free to do so, but I think the mobility increase alone is much more important than both those attributes combined.
In the end a APC is supposed to move into position as soon as possible to function as a spawn point. Sure the selling point of this specific APC is its MG, but APCs really dont need a MG to have purpose to begin with.
How is saying what they did… which you refer to as a buff misquoting you?
Again, I never said that.
Just because you don’t want to acknowledge it when you call it a buff doesn’t mean that you didn’t say it . You are painting out an ammo cap nerf to be a buff because they reduced overheating… you can ignore it all you want.
Do you speak english?
I never said a capacity reduction is a buff.
Do you want me to continue with this ridiculous nonsense of a conversation forever?
Sure, and by my understanding you were actually done with this conversation anyway… you even acknowledged it here lol.
You can pick out what i’m saying it’s fine and like you mentioned earlier is kind of childish… you are saying despite the reduction its been buffed because of the overheat, regardless you are defending their decisions with the excuse that its been “buffed”
Them reducing the ammo capacity is still a nerf… like i said earlier you are rationalizing it with the fact they reduced the overheating.
I wont even say its bad because it is fine where it is although i think reload could be lessened a bit… just the fact you want to defend it.
I paid for a sd kfz 251/1 with an mg with 150 rds… they have changed that.
ok, but is the actual overheating buffed or is it placebo? Becase if not, the overall volume of fire is lower, ya?
i’m pretty sure it was and like i said i don’t think it performs bad… i just find it a slap in the face… especially when ive been told that they can’t give premium rifleman engis because thats what they paid for is 9 rifleman… well i paid for 150 rds.
Listen, I claim that
Ammo reduction (small nerf) + overheat reduction (big buff) = overall the vehic has been buffed. (Not to mention the mobility buff, which is much bigger than both things combined.)
Now I can understand when you believe that capacity is more important than overheat, but you have been basically calling me a retard for the past days by misquoting me, claiming that I believe:
Capacity reduction on its own = buff
Which again and again I have never said.
Which would be as stupid of a believe as claiming the sky is green.
In other words learn to read before you misquote other people.