Russian bias on stalingrad

Hello, soviet light tank can pen pz 4 g even when angled on stalingrad, this is wrong and clearly biased towards the soviets, please fix.

2 Likes

The 45mm 20-K was a fairly high performance gun
And German tanks below the Tiger have dogshit armor protection for tanking actual hits
Just use the PzIIIN and its HEAT

2 Likes

It get nerfed as some user reported

4 Likes

:person_shrugging:
Its still able to slug it out with 45mm armed Soviets better than the PzIVs since the spaced armor will eat quite a few hits

1 Like

sounds like a skill issue. I killed a jumbo with my puma… from its side

4 Likes

Was it nerfed or is this the same “lower post pen ammo detonation chance” which some have also reported?

3 Likes

No it’s not wrong - the Pz-IVG has 50mm armour on the turret front and also small parts of the front upper glacis, and only 30mm on hte sides - easily penetrated by the 45mm even angled.

Your knowledge is clearly biased towards the nazis - please fix.

1 Like

It’s understandable jk

1 Like

Didn’t the F2 have 50 and the G 80 on turret front?

The G has additional 30mm plates on the top-front hull section -the bit that has the driver visor and bow machinegun mounted in it - otherwise the armour is identical.

The F2 and G are the same tank - “G” was a name given to F2’s after a 175 had been produced, and late in production the additional armour was added. There were some other modifications as production continued, but both had the Sd. Kfz 161/1 number.

A good player will never show you his side, this argument makes no sense.

ofc not, i basically went inside the enemy grey zone and flank his rear, and then retreat back when the tank is finally destroyed. maybe run over a couple of guys on my way out