Can you guess why Scotti is much better than StG? Can you guess why people are choosing Scotti over MkB 42(W)? Or why people prefer AVT40(20) over RD-44? For someone who talks about ‘skill issues’ its really not that hard to understand why 1 shot is extremely important in Enlisted
???
To do what? 2 shot them but with an MG? The hell are you talking about
‘Body armor doesnt matter’ but ‘I bought body armor for all my soldiers and I dont want those orders to go to waste’
Anecdotal evidence
Thats just ignorance
The plot thickens:
‘I dont want it removed because it doesnt affect the gameplay’
‘It doesnt matter for the high tier’
‘I have my soldier equipped with it’
‘I dont care about the body armor’
‘I am showing my disagreement because there has been a spam of it’
‘Just switch to another soldier’ (???)
All due respect but you have brought NOTHING to this conversation. All you did was say ‘oh it doesnt matter THAT much’ and everyone else just said that ‘THAT much’ is still TOO MUCH because that just unfair advanatage on a nation that has one of the best infantry weaponry in the game
Your entire input could’ve ended on a single sentance that got refuted by multiple people the moment it appeared
Cosmetics should be cosmetic only, no effect on gameplay
Body armor should not be available for Moscow/Stalingrad/Rzhev, only for Berlin and Manchuria, because it got any sort of widespread use only from late 1943.
Isn’t it covenient how one out of four factions gets
damage reduction cosmetic
flexible weapons paratroopers
completely made up BR5 equipment with a legal 1946 jet
True, which is why i said it should be reworked into an actual item like in alpha
it was widespread in stalingrad but almost didn’t exist in manchuria because there was no need for it in the theatre so it should only be present on berlin/stalingrad
completely made up BR5 equipment
you mean ho ri prototype, t20 rifle or type hei or silenced stg or what?
Pity me for wanting to respond to someone just responding “we do not care” which is exactly what i thought would happen when showing disagreement to such topic.
I’m well aware… this is factually an imbalance and should be removed, i just don’t want it as i have comes to terms with it
If you’ve thought the comments i’ve made have served nothing which ultimately boil down to me saying skill issue and get over it then you could have stopped responding awhile ago.
Also this is another argument I’ve seen thrown around so much and it never makes sense
Yes - most gunfights in enlisted are decided by who shoots first
Yes - there are factors like ping, hit reg etc that can influence TTKs heavily
Thing is the game isn’t programmed to have 30% chance to not register a hit when playing the Germany - as it would be totally ridicolous… just like the body armor affecting ‘3/10 gunfights’
This argument is pure whataboutism that only shows ones inability to comprehend the core issue of the topic at hand, being ‘why do only Soviets get such an advantage at consistent rate’
and again body armor wasnt even useful irl it couldnt stop even the smallest bullets
so it would have been better to jsut keep it as a cosmetic and thats it
The only person that has ever said anything about ‘not caring’ is you. Everyone else just said that despite it being ‘not as significant’ (30% OF THE GUNFIGHTS BTW, YOUR WORDS, WHICH IS ASTONISHING AMOUNT) its still happening and its not fair either way
Thats not a matter of ‘we dont care’ but a matter of ‘Its still a problem no matter how little the problem is’
No, no, in another thread I immaturly responded with ‘We do not care’ to him saying that he equipped 3 riflemen squads with them, which I am sorry about @uducn-live .
